In article <lIjKg.7630$q63.4807@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
"pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> news:yeah_uh-hu-CABDC8.12155702092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <LriKg.13915$%j7.11222@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
> > "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> > Awwww, can't handle a little dig?
> >>
> >> Naw. I just hate fascist enablers, thas all.
> >
> > Flowery language.
> >
> > What does it actually mean, are we supporting bin-Laden again?
>
> Maybe you are, but I'm not.

Nope, I voted for Bush, and I'm not calling for impeachment for shaking
up the status-quo in the mid-east.

You are apparently pro-impeachment. Regardless of your reasons, I can
assure you that your enemies see that as support for them, whether you
like it or not.

> >> > It's not the process of profiling, but the results you seemingly
> >> > propose, that are a bit contitutionally suspect.
> >>
> >> If you do the crime, prepare to do the time. If they were wanted, jail
> >> 'em.
> >> If they had a criminal history, segragate 'em, watch 'em like a hawk,
> >> and take advantage of the first chance to repatriate them.
> >
> > You're suggesting having a criminal history alone is a crime itself,
> > worthy of segregation and even jail? Sounds a bit fascist.
>
> A more careful approach to housing and assistance would be in order.
> And no greybar hotel, unless they had outstanding warrants or were wanted.

I could agree that sec 8-style restrictions could apply, in order to
keep the most dangerous from the regular population. It's a more
problematic thing though when dealing with a wave of refugees.

Basically, you have to wait for them to commit a criminal act on Texas
soil before you can imprison them.

> >> > Hate to break this to you, but US citizens are free to travel or
> >> > re-locate where they choose, with certain restrictions. It's a bit
> >> > difficult for Texas government to bar people at the border.
> >>
> >> But once they are here, there's nothing barring background checks PRIOR
> >> to
> >> allowing them shelter or services here. Just like HTown's policies on
> >> Section 8 assistance.
> >
> > That's a valid point, but what would you do with those who subject to
> > section 8 restrictions who were caught in Katrina, jail them? For what?
>
> I really do believe we could have build a tent city IN LA. for them.

No A/C?

> >> and those
> >> whose reliance on public assistance that would suggest that they weren't
> >> here to become citizens and workers. Then, ship 'em back to La. as fast
> >> as
> >> possible to a La. camp with similar
> >> acoutrements.
> >
> > What if they choose not to go where you tell them to? Under what law
> > would you evict US citizens from a state?
>
> Not my prob. That's why we have judges and courts. And Shrub coulda just
> said so, and made it so. It worked SO well with claims of WMDs.

You mean spending a year stating the case to Congress, the UN and the
American people.

Keep in mind that he was simply stating the *majority intel* position
concerning Saddam, he didn't make it up out of thin air.

Also, keep in mind that he echoed the big shots in the dem party as
well. If you're looking for someone to blame for exaggerated claims,
there's plenty of them out there.

You also might want to consider blaming Saddam for his own demise as
well.

> >> >> IF ShrubCo hadn't used the N.G. as his muscle in his illegal
> >> >> land-snatch,
> >> >> there would have been law enforcement, material, and vehicles
> >> >> available
> >> >> to
> >> >> help in this natural disaster.
> >> >
> >> > Illegal land-snatch? Huh?
> >>
> >> See 'Iraq'.
> >
> > I see. Pre-emptive measures against a possible foreign threat are
> > verbotten,
>
> No but elective war based on lies is unconstitutional.

But there were no lies, just a position based on existing intel
estimates. You do know what the NIE is, I assume. And how do you know he
wasn't planning on resurrecting programs, and/or moved existing supplies?

If you were privy to the intel, would you just count on a sanctions-free
Saddam and a corrupt and ineffective UN?


> > but pre-emptive detentionor "deportation" of US citizens
> > with criminal pasts is ok.
>
> The Patriot Act allows it. Att. Gen Gonzo said so! Gitmo, Ho!

Yep, but you'd think it was the Sedition Act or a WW2-style mass
internment from all the panic, when in fact, it really doesn't change
much. Warrentless searches and the like were a reality long before the
PA, look it up (and avoid those all-powerful Game Wardens)

> > After all, Saddam just wanted nasty weapons
> > and alliances against the country, he wasn't after your Jetta.
>
> See "containment ". It worked for 8 years prior to ShrubCo's illegal and
> immoral war.

That's not what US, UK, Australia, Ryssian, Egyptian, German, Italian
and other intel entities seemed to think.

And, what's immoral about liberating people from a barbaric regime that
kept them in a state of constant warfare and aggression, or the effects
of same?

I remember when "liberals" actually thought the reverse was immoral, I
thought they were against totalitarian police states, human rights
abuses and stuff like that.

The porridge just never seems the right temperature for the left.
Support Saddam, Bad! Take out Saddam, Bad!! Sanctions cause suffering,
Bad!!

It all distills to one position: "Free Saddam", then trust him. Sign a
treaty or something - they work! Until they don't, then of course it's
the US's fault somehow - we forced N. Korea to go nuclear, now we're
forcing Iran to do the same, while forcing Muslims to slaughter each
other in great numbers.

When will we stop forcing people into aggression, expansionism,
imperialism, fascism and secular warfare? We are SO not cool.


> >> > The US has plenty of money - that isn't what kept local officials from
> >> > issuing timely evacuation orders, -
> >>
> >> as was done...
> >
> > Not quite. It might have been more effective if the locals had taken the
> > Pres's advice at the time he offered it. He couldn't force them to -
> > that would be a fascist act.
>
> Shrub was fundraising and playin' the geetar. It was three day until he
> watched a DVD of the disater, and decided to roll up his sleaves and fly
> over the city.
> It was the local and state officials that screamed 'Get outa town! '

Days after Bush called and suggested they do so. They didn't.

So, failure of local government to act on Bush's personal reccomendation
is Bush's fault.

Then comes the porridge complaints again. He goes to NO, too hot. He
doesn't go to NO, too cold. We want our porridge JUST RIGHT!!

Uh-huh. Let's just assume that no matter what Bush does, it's wrong,
wrong, wrong!

Impeach the bastard because he's WRONG!!


> >> > as Bush had suggested early on.
> >> > Federal monies didn't keep people from evacuating,
> >>
> >> Nor did it help. NG amphibious vehicles and heavy trucks could have been
> >> useful - but they were in Iraq.
> >
> > We have plenty of vehicles stateside, that wasn't the problem.
>
> BULLSHIT. That's pure revisionist history.

You have a statistic on rescue vehicles in the NG? Hate to break it to
you, but there were plenty of vehicles available for evacuation, plenty
for rescue, locally and nationally. If local government declines the
offer until it's too late, impeach Bush!

I suppose he built the levees as well.

> >Timely
> > requests for same were the problem. The Feds made it clear early on that
> > the Governor could permit the use of these resources, which isn't a
> > function of Federal government.
>
> More BULLSHIT. Shrubco was days late

I repeat - Bush was the first to suggest emergency evacuation to Blanco.
She waited about two days to act. Sorry, you're just factually
inaccurate.

> and then tried to force the state to
> relinquish their NG to Shrubco. Blanco refused.

There you have it - Bush offers federal help, Blanco declines, blame
Bush.

> >> > but it did go to spur
> >> > the economy at Huoston titty bars and Best Buy.
> >>
> >> When I hire a new employee, I do a background check. It's not hard....
> >
> > So, in summation, you'd deny relief or aid to anyone with a criminal
> > record? Leave 'em in NO? Round 'em up?
>
> Segregate them, and proceed with care, but caution. Trust but Verify.
> Bring in the Houston City Housing Dept. ( I know, I know...) and judges, and
> the courts to hammer out a short term plan, while asking the Fed to begin
> building camps in La. to hold THEIR problem citizens.

That's reasonable. I can say that the refugees have changed my
daughter's suburban school, and not for the better.

> > Jeez, that would have probably left three or four people who qualified.
>
> You have a low opinion of evacuees. Hope you never find yourself in their
> shoes, eh?

If it's generational welfare, drug addiction, low education and high
potential for criminal activity you're referencing, the reason I'm not
in their shoes is because I don't depend on the feds for anything more
than the basics - I take care of my own.

If your referencing being a hurricane "victim" - been there, done that a
few times, I don't need the feds to force common sense down my throat,
which is why I never drowned.

--
The lawless will be given wide berth: the more lawless the wider the berth.

--Wrethcard the Cat.

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>> ______________
>>>>
>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>> By Star Parker
>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>
>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on freepin'
>>>Town
>>>Hall?
>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>
>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>
>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'

Translation: You can't refute her statements.

>>
>>>http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/060904crci_cinema
>>
>> New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>> (NYTimes?)
>
>You ARE clueless, aren't you. Wow....

Non-responsive.

>>>You really should watch 'When the Levees Broke', and perhaps learn a thing
>>>or two.
>>>Spike is fair spreading the blame for the failures of Government - both
>>>Dem.
>>>and Rep.
>>>When the levees broke, Shrubs credibility was washed away....
>>
>> Betcha got the bulk of yer edumacayshun from MTV
>
>What a witty rejoinder. Why, I can hear the spirits of the Algonquin
>Roundtable chuckling over your bon mot.

I got you pegged. Yo momma was an unwashed hippie dirtball who sat
you on her knee and regaled you with tales of the glory days: spitting
on Vietnam vets, trippin', and of course screwing the head of the
local Black Panther Party on the front steps of the courthouse during
a Black Power demonstration.

Bet she gave ya the middle name of "Moonbeam."

And, having missed all that, you're bitter.

>>>Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the truth of the
>>>message too harsh?
>>
>> You mean the very black Ms. Parker?
>
>I did not bring her race into this: you did, you rascist rascal...

Actually, you brought up the Spikester's race.

>>
>>>Let's face it: the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon.
>>
>> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051214b.html
>>
>Uhhh....and what was that in response to? I didn't mention, question, or
>speculate on race.
>But I DID say " the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon. "

Just more evidence to discredit the race-whining Spike.

>Don't you have some ShrubCo sycophant ( look it up...) to suck?
>Good luck on yer way down, loser.

Gawd but I luv crushing leftists and whiggers.

 
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/14/D8JGBLB80.html

Katrina Victims Blamed for Houston Crime
Aug 14 2:02 PM US/Eastern

By PAUL J. WEBER
Associated Press Writer
HOUSTON



A letter to inmate No. 1352951 and a cell phone bill for $76.63, both found
in a soggy New Orleans duplex ruined by Hurricane Katrina, led Louisiana
bounty hunter James Martin to Texas.
Again.

It marked the seventh time since Katrina that Martin, whose pursuit of bail
jumpers often begins with clues salvaged from abandoned New Orleans homes,
has followed a trail to Texas.

"I don't think Texas really knows what they got," Martin said.

Katrina sent a lot of bad guys to Texas, as Houston is finding out.

Houston took in 150,000 evacuees _ the most of any U.S. city _ after Katrina
struck on Aug. 29. Houston police believe the evacuees are partly
responsible for a nearly 17.5 percent increase in homicides so far this year
over the same period in 2005.

About 21 percent of Houston's 232 homicides through July 25 involved an
evacuee as either a suspect or a victim, according to police, who attribute
much of the bloodshed to fighting among rival New Orleans gang members.

"New Orleans allowed a lot of these guys to stay on the street for whatever
reason or be picked up and released after 60 days," said Capt. Dale Brown,
who oversees Houston's homicide division. "Texas law, I don't want to say
it's tougher, but we take these offenses very seriously."

Judge Robert Eckels, chief executive of Harris County, which includes
Houston, said Katrina evacuees arrested in the Houston have cost the
county's criminal justice system more than $18 million. In June, Texas Gov.
Rick Perry sent $19.5 million to Houston to help pay for additional officers
and overtime to police the city after Katrina.

The police and the Harris County sheriff's department said they have no
figures on how many Katrina evacuees have been arrested. Houston police said
misdemeanor and felony arrests overall actually dropped last fall from the
same period a year earlier. But the sheriff's department reported a 41
percent increase in felony arrests in November from the year before.

"I think some saw (Katrina) as an opportunity," Martin's bounty- hunting
partner, Michael Wright, said of evacuees who fled New Orleans with criminal
records. "No one knows who they are over here."

Katrina evacuees received fair warning when they arrived in Houston. Days
after the storm, Mayor Bill White went on television, flanked by Houston
police, and welcomed Katrina's bedraggled survivors with a stern warning
that a jail cell was waiting for anyone who crossed the line.

Evacuee Vincent Wilson, a leader of the Katrina Survivors Association, was
impressed. He said that in New Orleans before Katrina, "everyone knows that
if the jail's crowded you get a slap on the hand and get released."

Eckels predicted the county's worst guests will go home once their federal
assistance dries up. And if many choose to stick around, the county will be
ready: "We don't put up with it here. If you break the law, you're going to
be prosecuted."

___


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:04:01 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>>> When I hire a new employee, I do a background check. It's not hard....

So when you hire a new yard cutter, you phone back to Mexico to see if
"Jose Garza" has a criminal record? How quaint.
>>
>> So, in summation, you'd deny relief or aid to anyone with a criminal
>> record? Leave 'em in NO? Round 'em up?
>
>Segregate them, and proceed with care, but caution. Trust but Verify.
>Bring in the Houston City Housing Dept. ( I know, I know...) and judges, and
>the courts to hammer out a short term plan, while asking the Fed to begin
>building camps in La. to hold THEIR problem citizens.

I'll recommend that to the Austin city council. Next time Houston has
a mass evacuation, like for Rita last year, maybe we can close the
highways and direct the Houston trash to, say, Iowa.

 
"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>> ______________
>>>>>
>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>
>>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on freepin'
>>>>Town
>>>>Hall?
>>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>
>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>
>>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>
> Translation: You can't refute her statements.

I can in two sentences:
I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
She didn't see the same movie I did.

>
>>>
>>>>http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/060904crci_cinema
>>>
>>> New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>>> (NYTimes?)
>>
>>You ARE clueless, aren't you. Wow....
>
> Non-responsive.

Your Honor, I stand by my statement. He IS clueless.
"New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
(NYTimes?)" shows me ( and by extention, all readers of your
pig-squeezings )
that you haven't quite got a lock on the realationship between the two,
or even the existance of the two. Baliff, whack his pee-pee.



>
>>>>You really should watch 'When the Levees Broke', and perhaps learn a
>>>>thing
>>>>or two.
>>>>Spike is fair spreading the blame for the failures of Government - both
>>>>Dem.
>>>>and Rep.
>>>>When the levees broke, Shrubs credibility was washed away....
>>>
>>> Betcha got the bulk of yer edumacayshun from MTV
>>
>>What a witty rejoinder. Why, I can hear the spirits of the Algonquin
>>Roundtable chuckling over your bon mot.
>
> I got you pegged. Yo momma was an unwashed hippie dirtball who sat
> you on her knee and regaled you with tales of the glory days: spitting
> on Vietnam vets, trippin', and of course screwing the head of the
> local Black Panther Party on the front steps of the courthouse during
> a Black Power demonstration.

The only thing you could peg would would be a round hole....
>
> Bet she gave ya the middle name of "Moonbeam."

You lose that bet. Want to go 'Double or Nothin'? Do you have a Paypal
account?
Are you old enough to gamble on the internets and tubes and stuff?
>
> And, having missed all that, you're bitter.
>
>>>>Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the truth of the
>>>>message too harsh?
>>>
>>> You mean the very black Ms. Parker?
>>
>>I did not bring her race into this: you did, you rascist rascal...
>
> Actually, you brought up the Spikester's race.

No, I asked YOU " Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the
truth of the
message too harsh? ", and then you responded with a non-sequitur introducing
the topic of Ms parkers race. Do try to keep up.....

>>>
>>>>Let's face it: the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon.
>>>
>>> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051214b.html
>>>
>>Uhhh....and what was that in response to? I didn't mention, question, or
>>speculate on race.
>>But I DID say " the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon. "
>
> Just more evidence to discredit the race-whining Spike.

You REALLY need to work on your rhetorical skills.
See 'non-sequitor' in any dictionary without pictures, M'Kay?
>
>>Don't you have some ShrubCo sycophant ( look it up...) to suck?
>>Good luck on yer way down, loser.
>
> Gawd but I luv crushing leftists and whiggers.

The only thing you seem to be 'crushing' is your credibility,
or any claim to equality in discussions with your betters.
But, if you have nuthin' to lose.....

IMPEACH, INDICT, and IMPRISON the BushCo Junta.
( and kick their fascist enablers in the nuts, too! )

 


On 9/2/06 4:23 PM, in article fDmKg.696$MF1.80@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net,
"pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

> Baliff, whack his pee-pee.

Seriously, you should get a job or find something else to do.

"Man Overboard!!!"


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 
"Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
news:yeah_uh-hu-39330B.14282202092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <lIjKg.7630$q63.4807@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:yeah_uh-hu-CABDC8.12155702092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> > In article <LriKg.13915$%j7.11222@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
>> > "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> > Awwww, can't handle a little dig?
>> >>
>> >> Naw. I just hate fascist enablers, thas all.
>> >
>> > Flowery language.
>> >
>> > What does it actually mean, are we supporting bin-Laden again?
>>
>> Maybe you are, but I'm not.
>
> Nope, I voted for Bush, -
You actually ADMIT to voting for Shrub? Hahahahaha....Waaahahahahaha!!!!
At least we can all cease our speculation on your sanity.


>and I'm not calling for impeachment for shaking
> up the status-quo in the mid-east.

Would you consider calling for Impeachment violating federal laws against
making false statements to congress; federal laws and international treaties
prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; federal
laws concerning retaliating against witnesses and other government
employees; Executive Orders concerning leaking and other misuse of
intelligence; federal regulations and ethical requirements governing
conflicts of interest; the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act;
communications privacy laws; the National Security Act; and the Fourth
Amendment.

These are the legal grounds for Impeachment: as to your contention that
ShrubCo
was simply "shaking up the status-quo in the mid-east.", Bush was actually
spilling the blood of our National Guard troops while squandering our
treasure in his illegal invasion of a soveriegn nation. This clusterfuck is
costing US $195 million per day!!!!

And all for his cronies. Feel good about that vote, eh?

You are a fascist enabler. The lowest scum on the planet. A traitor to the
Constitution, and America.
Still feel good about that vote for armageddon, putz?

>
> You are apparently pro-impeachment. Regardless of your reasons, I can
> assure you that your enemies see that as support for them, whether you
> like it or not.

I can assure you that we see your support for the illegal BFEE putsch
as a direct assault on the very ideals this nation was founded on. That
makes you a traitor.
>
SNIP

>> Not my prob. That's why we have judges and courts. And Shrub coulda just
>> said so, and made it so. It worked SO well with claims of WMDs.
>
> You mean spending a year stating the case to Congress, the UN and the
> American people.

He LIED. He based those lies on lies. He lied to you, and you still voted
for him.
You are a traitorous fascist scumbag.
>
> Keep in mind that he was simply stating the *majority intel* position
> concerning Saddam, he didn't make it up out of thin air.

Now YOU are lying ( again). Maybe in YOUR mind it was 'the *majority intel*
position ',
but the whole world knew it was a lie with the publication of the Downing
Street memos PRIOR to the invasion. Because you chose to eat shit and smile
doesn't mean the world has to be dragged into hell with you, Fuck you very
much.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/840
>
> Also, keep in mind that he echoed the big shots in the dem party as
> well. If you're looking for someone to blame for exaggerated claims,
> there's plenty of them out there.

They were lied to, and were fed trumped up crap. They are now publicly
stating that they were lied to. Those Dems are now repudiating the lies, and
will be sponsoring the Articles of Impeachment when you ReThugs get your
traitorous and sorry nutsacks kicked to the gutter in November.
>
> You also might want to consider blaming Saddam for his own demise as
> well.

Like hell I will: I blame the entire Bush Family Evil Empire and the NeoCon
deathcult ninnies and their fascist enablers in the corporoMedia ( and YOU,
directly ) in the premeditated destruction of our once great nation.
>
>> >> >> IF ShrubCo hadn't used the N.G. as his muscle in his illegal
>> >> >> land-snatch,
>> >> >> there would have been law enforcement, material, and vehicles
>> >> >> available
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> help in this natural disaster.
>> >> >
>> >> > Illegal land-snatch? Huh?
>> >>
>> >> See 'Iraq'.
>> >
>> > I see. Pre-emptive measures against a possible foreign threat are
>> > verbotten,
>>
>> No but elective war based on lies is unconstitutional.
>
> But there were no lies, just a position based on existing intel
> estimates. You do know what the NIE is, I assume.

More lies!
http://mediamatters.org/items/200511080006


And how do you know he
> wasn't planning on resurrecting programs, and/or moved existing supplies?

You are a moran: these lies have been debunked sooo many times that it is an
isult that I must google them up for you, and rub your face in them. Try
ISG:
Here - short ( for your feeble attention span ) and sweet:
'The US chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has said inquiries into
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq have "gone as far as feasible".
Mr Duelfer also said an official transfer of WMDs to Syria ahead of the Iraq
war was not likely.

The CIA adviser reported last year that neither expected stockpiles of
chemical or biological weapons, nor evidence of recent production had been
found. '

You have proven, by your vote, that you are stupidly suicidal, and do not
possess the intellectual integrity necessary to be a part of this national
debate.
>
> If you were privy to the intel, would you just count on a sanctions-free
> Saddam and a corrupt and ineffective UN?

Fuck you! Just Fuck you! I WAS privy to the intel, and so was anyone who
read The DSM, or paid attention to the UNMOVIC, or listened to the UN.
Saddam was checkmated. But doing nothing wouldn't have allowed ShrubCo to
steal the oill from the middle east to fatten his cronies' offshore
accounts.
All they really needed was a Pearl harbor kinda event to galvanize the sheep
( YOU ) into allowing fascism to take root in America.
>
>
>> > but pre-emptive detentionor "deportation" of US citizens
>> > with criminal pasts is ok.
>>
>> The Patriot Act allows it. Att. Gen Gonzo said so! Gitmo, Ho!
>
> Yep, but you'd think it was the Sedition Act or a WW2-style mass
> internment from all the panic, when in fact, it really doesn't change
> much. Warrentless searches and the like were a reality long before the
> PA, look it up (and avoid those all-powerful Game Wardens)

Pure BULLSHIT.
http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/2041/1/239?TopicID=1
>
>> > After all, Saddam just wanted nasty weapons
>> > and alliances against the country, he wasn't after your Jetta.
>>
>> See "containment ". It worked for 8 years prior to ShrubCo's illegal and
>> immoral war.
>
> That's not what US, UK, Australia, Ryssian, Egyptian, German, Italian
> and other intel entities seemed to think.

BULLSHIT. You are pulling this shit out of your ass....
Prior to 2002, the UN Security Council had passed sixteen resolutions on
Iraq. In 2002, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1441 on Iraq
unanimously. In 2003, the US, UK, and Spanish governments proposed another
resolution on Iraq, which they called the "eighteenth resolution" and others
called the "second resolution". This proposed resolution was subsequently
withdrawn because not enough countries would have supported it, making it a
political mistake for its sponsors.

On September 16, 2004 Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United
Nations, speaking on the invasion, said, "I have indicated it was not in
conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view, from the charter
point of view, it was illegal."
>
> And, what's immoral about liberating people from a barbaric regime that
> kept them in a state of constant warfare and aggression, or the effects
> of same?

You are a lying sycophantic fascist enabler.

We INVADED IRAQ ILLEGALLY. WE ARE KILLING TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ITS CITIZENS
ILLEGALLY!
>
> I remember when "liberals" actually thought the reverse was immoral, I
> thought they were against totalitarian police states, human rights
> abuses and stuff like that.

We do. That's why we hate YOU and the ShrubCo Junta.
>
> The porridge just never seems the right temperature for the left.
> Support Saddam, Bad! Take out Saddam, Bad!! Sanctions cause suffering,
> Bad!!

The poison is always sooo tasty to the Rethuglican retards. Lap it up, you
stupid fascist enabler!
>
> It all distills to one position: "Free Saddam", then trust him. Sign a
> treaty or something - they work! Until they don't, then of course it's
> the US's fault somehow - we forced N. Korea to go nuclear, now we're
> forcing Iran to do the same, while forcing Muslims to slaughter each
> other in great numbers.

Bullshit! Patriots and Statesmen can deal with real threats to our Nation.
Bullshit MotherFuckers like you can suck Shrubs cock and call it candy, but
it doesn't diminish the fact that ShrubCo has decided to insert itself into
the middle east in search of oil to enrich their cronies in an insane policy
based on the status quo of Big Oil, and Big cars, Big Houses bought on ARMs,
and suicidal consumption based on deathcult Politics foisted on us by the
corporate media and short-sighted greedy BigBox Bidness-as-usual oligarchs.

It was a rush to worldwide, neverending war instead of LEADING us into a
sustainable future not based on hydrocarbon fuels and corporate greed. They
couldn't make the right or hard choice. They chose to run'n'grab, and ignore
the path that would have made us the world leaders in sustainable energy,
and measures to defuse the ticking timebomb that is Global Warming.


>
> When will we stop forcing people into aggression, expansionism,
> imperialism, fascism and secular warfare? We are SO not cool.



As soon as you and your ilk are thouroughly discredited ( and then hung from
steetlights ), and the ShrubCo junta is imprisoned for their treason to the
American People.


SNIP

>Then comes the porridge complaints again. He goes to NO, too hot. He
> doesn't go to NO, too cold. We want our porridge JUST RIGHT!!

I hope the noose you have placed around your own neck is neither too tight,
or too loose. I hope it is JUST RIGHT.
>
> Uh-huh. Let's just assume that no matter what Bush does, it's wrong,
> wrong, wrong!

Right! Right!Right!
>
> Impeach the bastard because he's WRONG!!

That sums it up nicely.
SNIP!


- I take care of my own.

You sure did: you voted with your selfish dick, and not your brain.

You got Shrub, and the world got fucked. Enjoy your immoral, stolen
'victory', fascist!

It's not going to last too much longer!

>
> If your referencing being a hurricane "victim" - been there, done that a
> few times, I don't need the feds to force common sense down my throat,
> which is why I never drowned.

Yet....but after we get our hands on the quislings, you could take another
shot at drowning with an Alberto Special. Waterboarding for all fascist
fuckwits.

 
"George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:C11F6595.723D%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
>
>
>
> On 9/2/06 4:23 PM, in article fDmKg.696$MF1.80@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net,
> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>> Baliff, whack his pee-pee.
>
> Seriously, you should get a job or find something else to do.

This IS my job. To neuter you until the second shift comes. They'd better
hurry cause I'm gettin' hungry...
>

 
"George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:C11F5633.6E48%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/14/D8JGBLB80.html
>
> Katrina Victims Blamed for Houston Crime
> Aug 14 2:02 PM US/Eastern
>
> By PAUL J. WEBER
> Associated Press Writer
> HOUSTON
>
>
>
> A letter to inmate No. 1352951 and a cell phone bill for $76.63, both
> found
> in a soggy New Orleans duplex ruined by Hurricane Katrina, led Louisiana
> bounty hunter James Martin to Texas.
> Again.

I wonder if your dad even called you while he was hiding here?

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>
>>>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on freepin'
>>>>>Town
>>>>>Hall?
>>>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>
>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>
>>>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>
>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>
>I can in two sentences:
>I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>She didn't see the same movie I did.

You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
glasses at the time?



>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/060904crci_cinema
>>>>
>>>> New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>>>> (NYTimes?)
>>>
>>>You ARE clueless, aren't you. Wow....
>>
>> Non-responsive.
>
>Your Honor, I stand by my statement. He IS clueless.
>"New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
> (NYTimes?)" shows me ( and by extention, all readers of your
>pig-squeezings )
> that you haven't quite got a lock on the realationship between the two,
>or even the existance of the two. Baliff, whack his pee-pee.

New Yawker .... NYTimes ... both scumbag extensions of Walter Duranty,
comrade.
>
>
>>
>>>>>You really should watch 'When the Levees Broke', and perhaps learn a
>>>>>thing
>>>>>or two.
>>>>>Spike is fair spreading the blame for the failures of Government - both
>>>>>Dem.
>>>>>and Rep.
>>>>>When the levees broke, Shrubs credibility was washed away....
>>>>
>>>> Betcha got the bulk of yer edumacayshun from MTV
>>>
>>>What a witty rejoinder. Why, I can hear the spirits of the Algonquin
>>>Roundtable chuckling over your bon mot.
>>
>> I got you pegged. Yo momma was an unwashed hippie dirtball who sat
>> you on her knee and regaled you with tales of the glory days: spitting
>> on Vietnam vets, trippin', and of course screwing the head of the
>> local Black Panther Party on the front steps of the courthouse during
>> a Black Power demonstration.
>
>The only thing you could peg would would be a round hole....

Bet yo mama still has pictures of Rap, Stoke, Huey and Bobby on her
bedroom wall.


>> Bet she gave ya the middle name of "Moonbeam."

Bet she told you to worship at the pedestal of appeasement.


>You lose that bet. Want to go 'Double or Nothin'? Do you have a Paypal
>account?
>Are you old enough to gamble on the internets and tubes and stuff?

Bet she instilled in you the doctrines of share the wealth, dumb down
the curriculum in the name of diversity, and moral relativism.

>> And, having missed all that, you're bitter.
>>
>>>>>Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the truth of the
>>>>>message too harsh?
>>>>
>>>> You mean the very black Ms. Parker?
>>>
>>>I did not bring her race into this: you did, you rascist rascal...
>>
>> Actually, you brought up the Spikester's race.
>
>No, I asked YOU " Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the
>truth of the
>message too harsh? ", and then you responded with a non-sequitur introducing
>the topic of Ms parkers race. Do try to keep up.....

Nope. You trotted out the race card first.

But got yer ass trumped upon learning the Star Parker's a sistah.

>>>>
>>>>>Let's face it: the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051214b.html
>>>>
>>>Uhhh....and what was that in response to? I didn't mention, question, or
>>>speculate on race.
>>>But I DID say " the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon. "
>>
>> Just more evidence to discredit the race-whining Spike.
>
>You REALLY need to work on your rhetorical skills.
>See 'non-sequitor' in any dictionary without pictures, M'Kay?

Sequitor? Not in any English dictionary, Senor.




>>>Don't you have some ShrubCo sycophant ( look it up...) to suck?
>>>Good luck on yer way down, loser.
>>
>> Gawd but I luv crushing leftists and whiggers.
>
>The only thing you seem to be 'crushing' is your credibility,
> or any claim to equality in discussions with your betters.
>But, if you have nuthin' to lose.....

All you can do is sling insults, senor.

That's what leftists tend to do.

>IMPEACH, INDICT, and IMPRISON the BushCo Junta.
>( and kick their fascist enablers in the nuts, too! )

Open Borders Bush is a disgrace.

Too fucking liberal for starters.

In article <C11F5633.6E48%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>,
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/14/D8JGBLB80.html
>
> Katrina Victims Blamed for Houston Crime
>

This is a shocking and unexpected, who could have seen this coming?

Probably those that believe that NO will be anything more than a swamp
in four years /flushing sound/.

It will be popular with scuba divers in HazMat suits eventually.

Every beach I lived on is now gone. That's 52 years of beach, and it's
like the cycle of a wave spread put over decades, centuries even.

We must panic. Now. The incoming wave is... incoming, and is waaaay
worse than the last wave, and we must hobble industry! Impeach someone!

--
The lawless will be given wide berth: the more lawless the wider the berth.

--Wrethcard the Cat.

In article <gaoKg.7695$q63.4447@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
"pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > Nope, I voted for Bush, -


> You actually ADMIT to voting for Shrub? Hahahahaha....Waaahahahahaha!!!!

Yeah.

I take it you vote for losers, but assume a last laugh somehow.


> >and I'm not calling for impeachment for shaking
> > up the status-quo in the mid-east.
>
> Would you consider calling for Impeachment violating federal laws against
> making false statements to congress; federal laws and international treaties
> prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; federal
> laws concerning retaliating against witnesses and other government
> employees; Executive Orders concerning leaking and other misuse of
> intelligence; federal regulations and ethical requirements governing
> conflicts of interest; the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act;
> communications privacy laws; the National Security Act; and the Fourth
> Amendment.

Were it so, yes.

> These are the legal grounds for Impeachment: as to your contention that
> ShrubCo
> was simply "shaking up the status-quo in the mid-east.", Bush was actually
> spilling the blood of our National Guard troops while squandering our
> treasure in his illegal invasion of a soveriegn nation. This clusterfuck is
> costing US $195 million per day!!!!

I suggest you compare historical cost of war as compared to GDP for
starters. Get back to me on economics after careful study.

Start at WW2, which consumed close to 50% of GDP. and work your way up.


> You are a fascist enabler. The lowest scum on the planet. A traitor to the
> Constitution, and America.
> Still feel good about that vote for armageddon, putz?

Well, I am seeking your endorsement, obviously.

> > You are apparently pro-impeachment. Regardless of your reasons, I can
> > assure you that your enemies see that as support for them, whether you
> > like it or not.
>
> I can assure you that we see your support for the illegal BFEE putsch
> as a direct assault on the very ideals this nation was founded on. That
> makes you a traitor.

Perhaps we should take poll, comrade. Are you or are you not an idiot
wandering with a stolen market cart full of discarded leftist bullshit?

I say yes.

--
The lawless will be given wide berth: the more lawless the wider the berth.

--Wrethcard the Cat.

 

pitchforks and torches wrote:
>
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message
> news:44F9BC86.F72D52D7@GrumpyvilleNOT.com...
> >
> >
> > pitchforks and torches wrote:
> >>
> >> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:C11F0567.6D9D%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 9/2/06 9:22 AM, in article 44F99443.AAD0B312@GrumpyvilleNOT.com,
> >> > "Grumpy
> >> > AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> pitchforks and torches wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:yeah_uh-hu-AC8D02.18372901092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> >>>> In article <9RXJg.297$MF1.23@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
> >> >>>> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>>>> news:C11DAC11.6A4C%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On 9/1/06 6:40 AM, in article 44f81c1c.3555953@free.teranews.com,
> >> >>>>>> "Way
> >> >>>>>> Back
> >> >>>>>> Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> First thing you noticed were the songs played over the stadium's
> >> >>>>>>> audio
> >> >>>>>>> system: "South Of The Border," "El Rancho Rock," "La Bamba," and
> >> >>>>>>> "La
> >> >>>>>>> Cucaracha." The camera panned the fans and all you could see
> >> >>>>>>> were
> >> >>>>>>> people with dark hair, brown skin, small eyes, fleshy cheeks, and
> >> >>>>>>> flabby physiques. My Gawd!! the place was lousy with Mexicans.
> >> >>>>>>> Any
> >> >>>>>>> white people still in Texas? Hello? It also makes you wonder
> >> >>>>>>> how
> >> >>>>>>> they could afford to attend a major league baseball game. Must
> >> >>>>>>> have
> >> >>>>>>> a
> >> >>>>>>> generous welfare package in the Lone Star State.
> >> >>>>>> That's the reason that we can't get rid of the New Orleans
> >> >>>>>> criminals.
> >> >>>>>> The
> >> >>>>>> dems want the votes of those good folks so they keep 'em on the
> >> >>>>>> payroll.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> That was an ignorant, racist, and Rethuglican comment to add to
> >> >>>>> that
> >> >>>>> troll
> >> >>>>> post.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> But that's our Gorge. Just one of HTown's resident fascist
> >> >>>>> enablers.
> >> >>>>> You can almost smell the fear.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Fascist enablers. Heh, good one.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Surely you aware that NO had a bad reputation as a high-crime city,
> >> >>>> based on, well, facts.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Yes, I was/am aware. I was attacked on my honeymoon there, and lost
> >> >>> my
> >> >>> wallet to a gang. It took years to deal with the ID theft and
> >> >>> subsequent
> >> >>> clones of my personhood.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Ya think the criminal element cleaned up their act when they moved?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> No. A leopard can't change its spots. HTown was victimized, but I was
> >> >>> hoping
> >> >>> that the evacuees would be vetted a lot more carefully by Fed, State,
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> local law enforcement, and the large numbers of miscreants would be
> >> >>> segregated and dealt with. To scatter them into the general
> >> >>> population
> >> >>> was
> >> >>> the real mistake. The inability of the Fed to respond by providing
> >> >>> facilities in Louisiana for their return was the biggest mistake...
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Why izzit always the "feds" responsibility to cure all our ills? Oh,
> >> >> I
> >> >> know! You were brought up to suck on the endless teat, eh?
> >> >>
> >> >> JT
> >> > Yep - this one was raised by a sheep. BAHHHH!
> >>
> >> And speaking of sheep, howz that infatuation with GWB and the Rethuglican
> >> party workin' out for ya? Are you enjoying your shearing?
> >
> >
> > I am no fan of GWB but I do respect the practice of personal
> > responsibility, a practice BTW seldom observed in the nanny based
> > liberal world.
>
> I respect personal responsibility. I object to corporations getting welfare
> and skipping on their tax obligations while they are gutting us, saddling us
> with enormous debts, outsourcing our jobs, wrecking our manufacturing base,
> robbing our children of their futures, and destroying our only home, planet
> Earth.
>

The only responsibility ANY business has is to make a profit legally.


> It is time to destroy the criminal enterprise of the
> Industrial/Media/GOVERNMENT
> complex, and demand a little corporate/government responsibilty.
>

Destroy the incentive for business, and you will have the same malaize
as the old Soviet Union...



> It IS an act of personal responsibility, and our public responsibility, to
> demand that the entire Fascist cabal be impeached, indicted, and imprisoned.
>

You had better include the anti business edicts passed by Democrats over
the years.



> > Should the Democrats produce a viable candidate, my support will be
> > forthcoming...
>
> Check out General Clark....he would make a fine candidate.
>

General Clark is held in disdain by his fellow military veterans
(including me). In fact he was fired by Clinton after nearly starting a
war with the Russians over a silly incident in the former Yugoslavia.

JT

 
"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message
news:44FA7991.D4C03B9E@GrumpyvilleNOT.com...
>
>
> pitchforks and torches wrote:
>>
>> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message
>> news:44F9BC86.F72D52D7@GrumpyvilleNOT.com...
>> >
>> >
>> > pitchforks and torches wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:C11F0567.6D9D%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 9/2/06 9:22 AM, in article 44F99443.AAD0B312@GrumpyvilleNOT.com,
>> >> > "Grumpy
>> >> > AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> pitchforks and torches wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>> news:yeah_uh-hu-AC8D02.18372901092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> >> >>>> In article <9RXJg.297$MF1.23@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
>> >> >>>> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>> news:C11DAC11.6A4C%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On 9/1/06 6:40 AM, in article
>> >> >>>>>> 44f81c1c.3555953@free.teranews.com,
>> >> >>>>>> "Way
>> >> >>>>>> Back
>> >> >>>>>> Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> First thing you noticed were the songs played over the
>> >> >>>>>>> stadium's
>> >> >>>>>>> audio
>> >> >>>>>>> system: "South Of The Border," "El Rancho Rock," "La Bamba,"
>> >> >>>>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>>> "La
>> >> >>>>>>> Cucaracha." The camera panned the fans and all you could see
>> >> >>>>>>> were
>> >> >>>>>>> people with dark hair, brown skin, small eyes, fleshy cheeks,
>> >> >>>>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>>> flabby physiques. My Gawd!! the place was lousy with
>> >> >>>>>>> Mexicans.
>> >> >>>>>>> Any
>> >> >>>>>>> white people still in Texas? Hello? It also makes you wonder
>> >> >>>>>>> how
>> >> >>>>>>> they could afford to attend a major league baseball game.
>> >> >>>>>>> Must
>> >> >>>>>>> have
>> >> >>>>>>> a
>> >> >>>>>>> generous welfare package in the Lone Star State.
>> >> >>>>>> That's the reason that we can't get rid of the New Orleans
>> >> >>>>>> criminals.
>> >> >>>>>> The
>> >> >>>>>> dems want the votes of those good folks so they keep 'em on the
>> >> >>>>>> payroll.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> That was an ignorant, racist, and Rethuglican comment to add to
>> >> >>>>> that
>> >> >>>>> troll
>> >> >>>>> post.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> But that's our Gorge. Just one of HTown's resident fascist
>> >> >>>>> enablers.
>> >> >>>>> You can almost smell the fear.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Fascist enablers. Heh, good one.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Surely you aware that NO had a bad reputation as a high-crime
>> >> >>>> city,
>> >> >>>> based on, well, facts.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Yes, I was/am aware. I was attacked on my honeymoon there, and
>> >> >>> lost
>> >> >>> my
>> >> >>> wallet to a gang. It took years to deal with the ID theft and
>> >> >>> subsequent
>> >> >>> clones of my personhood.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Ya think the criminal element cleaned up their act when they
>> >> >>>> moved?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> No. A leopard can't change its spots. HTown was victimized, but I
>> >> >>> was
>> >> >>> hoping
>> >> >>> that the evacuees would be vetted a lot more carefully by Fed,
>> >> >>> State,
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> local law enforcement, and the large numbers of miscreants would
>> >> >>> be
>> >> >>> segregated and dealt with. To scatter them into the general
>> >> >>> population
>> >> >>> was
>> >> >>> the real mistake. The inability of the Fed to respond by providing
>> >> >>> facilities in Louisiana for their return was the biggest
>> >> >>> mistake...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why izzit always the "feds" responsibility to cure all our ills?
>> >> >> Oh,
>> >> >> I
>> >> >> know! You were brought up to suck on the endless teat, eh?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> JT
>> >> > Yep - this one was raised by a sheep. BAHHHH!
>> >>
>> >> And speaking of sheep, howz that infatuation with GWB and the
>> >> Rethuglican
>> >> party workin' out for ya? Are you enjoying your shearing?
>> >
>> >
>> > I am no fan of GWB but I do respect the practice of personal
>> > responsibility, a practice BTW seldom observed in the nanny based
>> > liberal world.
>>
>> I respect personal responsibility. I object to corporations getting
>> welfare
>> and skipping on their tax obligations while they are gutting us, saddling
>> us
>> with enormous debts, outsourcing our jobs, wrecking our manufacturing
>> base,
>> robbing our children of their futures, and destroying our only home,
>> planet
>> Earth.
>>
>
> The only responsibility ANY business has is to make a profit legally.

Agreed: but Big Bidness has subverted the 'law': Offshoring to avoid taxes,
little or no re-investment in their infrastructure ( BP ) , welching on
their obligations to pensions,
etc. The 'laws' ( gutted by lobbies ) need to be re-examined.
'Legal' doesn't equal right and fair any longer.


>> It is time to destroy the criminal enterprise of the
>> Industrial/Media/GOVERNMENT
>> complex, and demand a little corporate/government responsibilty.
>>
>
> Destroy the incentive for business, and you will have the same malaize
> as the old Soviet Union...

Responsibilties, defined and enforced, will not change the fundementals of
supply and demand.
>
>
>
>> It IS an act of personal responsibility, and our public responsibility,
>> to
>> demand that the entire Fascist cabal be impeached, indicted, and
>> imprisoned.
>>
>
> You had better include the anti business edicts passed by Democrats over
> the years.

Legislating responsible and ethical business practices isn't a hallmark of
fascism.
>
>
>
>> > Should the Democrats produce a viable candidate, my support will be
>> > forthcoming...
>>
>> Check out General Clark....he would make a fine candidate.
>>
>
> General Clark is held in disdain by his fellow military veterans
> (including me). In fact he was fired by Clinton after nearly starting a
> war with the Russians over a silly incident in the former Yugoslavia.

And you will find equally supportive numbers of the Military for Gen. Clark.
Check your claim that Clinton initiated the 'firing' of Clark. Bill
remembers it differently.
"....a setup, engineered by Cohen's office and by the Chiefs. As for
Clinton, "He was hornswoggled." attr: Sandy Berger.
>
> JT

 
"Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
news:44fa27be.52247281@news.prodigy.net...
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on freepin'
>>>>>>Town
>>>>>>Hall?
>>>>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>>
>>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>>
>>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>>
>>I can in two sentences:
>>I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>>She didn't see the same movie I did.
>
> You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
> glasses at the time?

She's a RW shill who bent the truth in her 'review' ( smear ).
>
>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/060904crci_cinema
>>>>>
>>>>> New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>>>>> (NYTimes?)
>>>>
>>>>You ARE clueless, aren't you. Wow....
>>>
>>> Non-responsive.
>>
>>Your Honor, I stand by my statement. He IS clueless.
>>"New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>> (NYTimes?)" shows me ( and by extention, all readers of your
>>pig-squeezings )
>> that you haven't quite got a lock on the realationship between the two,
>>or even the existance of the two. Baliff, whack his pee-pee.
>
> New Yawker .... NYTimes ... both scumbag extensions of Walter Duranty,
> comrade.

Moran: (1) He was a reporter for the NYT in the 30s (2) he died in 1957
(3) He was not in management, nor was he owner or publisher or EITHER
the NYT of the NYr.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>>>You really should watch 'When the Levees Broke', and perhaps learn a
>>>>>>thing
>>>>>>or two.
>>>>>>Spike is fair spreading the blame for the failures of Government -
>>>>>>both
>>>>>>Dem.
>>>>>>and Rep.
>>>>>>When the levees broke, Shrubs credibility was washed away....
>>>>>
>>>>> Betcha got the bulk of yer edumacayshun from MTV
>>>>
>>>>What a witty rejoinder. Why, I can hear the spirits of the Algonquin
>>>>Roundtable chuckling over your bon mot.
>>>
>>> I got you pegged. Yo momma was an unwashed hippie dirtball who sat
>>> you on her knee and regaled you with tales of the glory days: spitting
>>> on Vietnam vets, trippin', and of course screwing the head of the
>>> local Black Panther Party on the front steps of the courthouse during
>>> a Black Power demonstration.
>>
>>The only thing you could peg would would be a round hole....
>
> Bet yo mama still has pictures of Rap, Stoke, Huey and Bobby on her
> bedroom wall.

Your debating/persuasive writing skills are on par with a illiterate
Bolivian shoemaker.
( with heartfelt apologies to all illiterate Bolivian shoemakers perusing
this post )
>
>
>>> Bet she gave ya the middle name of "Moonbeam."
>
> Bet she told you to worship at the pedestal of appeasement.

Your desperate act of Defending the indefensible IS fascist Appeasement.
Enjoy the wild ride down to ignoble irrelivance.
>
>
>>You lose that bet. Want to go 'Double or Nothin'? Do you have a Paypal
>>account?
>>Are you old enough to gamble on the internets and tubes and stuff?
>
> Bet she instilled in you the doctrines of share the wealth, dumb down
> the curriculum in the name of diversity, and moral relativism.

Quite the opposite.
>
>>> And, having missed all that, you're bitter.
>>>
>>>>>>Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the truth of the
>>>>>>message too harsh?
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean the very black Ms. Parker?
>>>>
>>>>I did not bring her race into this: you did, you rascist rascal...
>>>
>>> Actually, you brought up the Spikester's race.
>>
>>No, I asked YOU " Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the
>>truth of the
>>message too harsh? ", and then you responded with a non-sequitur
>>introducing
>>the topic of Ms parkers race. Do try to keep up.....
>
> Nope. You trotted out the race card first.
>
> But got yer ass trumped upon learning the Star Parker's a sistah.

Her race is not important: her veracity IS. Her 'opinions' are designed to
denegrate Spike's film, and have been debunked by real critics ( not
partisan attack-dogs ), and the people who have survived the ShrubCo
debacle. Those are their own words on screen, not Spike's....

>>>>>
>>>>>>Let's face it: the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051214b.html
>>>>>
>>>>Uhhh....and what was that in response to? I didn't mention, question, or
>>>>speculate on race.
>>>>But I DID say " the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon. "
>>>
>>> Just more evidence to discredit the race-whining Spike.
>>
>>You REALLY need to work on your rhetorical skills.
>>See 'non-sequitor' in any dictionary without pictures, M'Kay?
>
> Sequitor? Not in any English dictionary, Senor.

Typo. Mea Culpa, Asshole.
I guess I'll have to upgrade this ol' box to get a smell-checkor.
I do pretty well without it.....
Without spelling flames you would be hard pressed to attack your betters.
>

>>>>Don't you have some ShrubCo sycophant ( look it up...) to suck?
>>>>Good luck on yer way down, loser.
>>>
>>> Gawd but I luv crushing leftists and whiggers.
>>
>>The only thing you seem to be 'crushing' is your credibility,
>> or any claim to equality in discussions with your betters.
>>But, if you have nuthin' to lose.....
>
> All you can do is sling insults, senor.

And crush mental midget rascists. It's fun, but it leaves mung on the bottom
of my shoes.
>
> That's what leftists tend to do.

No, that's what intelligent free-thinkers do when confronted with rascist
Fascists.
>
>>IMPEACH, INDICT, and IMPRISON the BushCo Junta.
>>( and kick their fascist enablers in the nuts, too! )
>
> Open Borders Bush is a disgrace.

Agree! ShrubCo is a disgrace AND a monumental failure.
>
> Too fucking liberal for starters.

Too Fascist for me. Too liberal for moran fascists....

 
"Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
news:yeah_uh-hu-204C1C.20160802092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <gaoKg.7695$q63.4447@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > Nope, I voted for Bush, -
>
>
>> You actually ADMIT to voting for Shrub? Hahahahaha....Waaahahahahaha!!!!
>
> Yeah.
>
> I take it you vote for losers, but assume a last laugh somehow.

I voted for the REAL winner.
>
>
>> >and I'm not calling for impeachment for shaking
>> > up the status-quo in the mid-east.
>>
>> Would you consider calling for Impeachment violating federal laws against
>> making false statements to congress; federal laws and international
>> treaties
>> prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; federal
>> laws concerning retaliating against witnesses and other government
>> employees; Executive Orders concerning leaking and other misuse of
>> intelligence; federal regulations and ethical requirements governing
>> conflicts of interest; the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act;
>> communications privacy laws; the National Security Act; and the Fourth
>> Amendment.
>
> Were it so, yes.

See ' United States District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ', and
http://www.mied.uscourts.gov/eGov/taylorpdf/06%2010204.pdf
for free clues.
>
>> These are the legal grounds for Impeachment: as to your contention that
>> ShrubCo
>> was simply "shaking up the status-quo in the mid-east.", Bush was
>> actually
>> spilling the blood of our National Guard troops while squandering our
>> treasure in his illegal invasion of a soveriegn nation. This clusterfuck
>> is
>> costing US $195 million per day!!!!
>
> I suggest you compare historical cost of war as compared to GDP for
> starters. Get back to me on economics after careful study.

That doesn't change the fact that we are pissing away blood and treasure at
an astounding rate: and should the ecomony crash ( it will, soon ), GDP will
also crash making the comparison an imbarrassing false assumption.

>
> Start at WW2, which consumed close to 50% of GDP. and work your way up.

You are ignoring the cost of oil....that surely changes the equasion.
>
>
>> You are a fascist enabler. The lowest scum on the planet. A traitor to
>> the
>> Constitution, and America.
>> Still feel good about that vote for armageddon, putz?
>
> Well, I am seeking your endorsement, obviously.

You lose.
>
>> > You are apparently pro-impeachment. Regardless of your reasons, I can
>> > assure you that your enemies see that as support for them, whether you
>> > like it or not.
>>
>> I can assure you that we see your support for the illegal BFEE putsch
>> as a direct assault on the very ideals this nation was founded on. That
>> makes you a traitor.
>
> Perhaps we should take poll, comrade. Are you or are you not an idiot
> wandering with a stolen market cart full of discarded leftist bullshit?
>
> I say yes.

And your opinion is in the minority ( as is your Fascist party ).
Enjoy the joyride to irrelevance.

 

pitchforks and torches wrote:
>
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message
> news:44FA7991.D4C03B9E@GrumpyvilleNOT.com...
> >
> >
> > pitchforks and torches wrote:
> >>
> >> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message
> >> news:44F9BC86.F72D52D7@GrumpyvilleNOT.com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > pitchforks and torches wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:C11F0567.6D9D%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 9/2/06 9:22 AM, in article 44F99443.AAD0B312@GrumpyvilleNOT.com,
> >> >> > "Grumpy
> >> >> > AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> pitchforks and torches wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>> news:yeah_uh-hu-AC8D02.18372901092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> >> >>>> In article <9RXJg.297$MF1.23@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
> >> >> >>>> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>> news:C11DAC11.6A4C%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On 9/1/06 6:40 AM, in article
> >> >> >>>>>> 44f81c1c.3555953@free.teranews.com,
> >> >> >>>>>> "Way
> >> >> >>>>>> Back
> >> >> >>>>>> Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> First thing you noticed were the songs played over the
> >> >> >>>>>>> stadium's
> >> >> >>>>>>> audio
> >> >> >>>>>>> system: "South Of The Border," "El Rancho Rock," "La Bamba,"
> >> >> >>>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>> "La
> >> >> >>>>>>> Cucaracha." The camera panned the fans and all you could see
> >> >> >>>>>>> were
> >> >> >>>>>>> people with dark hair, brown skin, small eyes, fleshy cheeks,
> >> >> >>>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>> flabby physiques. My Gawd!! the place was lousy with
> >> >> >>>>>>> Mexicans.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Any
> >> >> >>>>>>> white people still in Texas? Hello? It also makes you wonder
> >> >> >>>>>>> how
> >> >> >>>>>>> they could afford to attend a major league baseball game.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Must
> >> >> >>>>>>> have
> >> >> >>>>>>> a
> >> >> >>>>>>> generous welfare package in the Lone Star State.
> >> >> >>>>>> That's the reason that we can't get rid of the New Orleans
> >> >> >>>>>> criminals.
> >> >> >>>>>> The
> >> >> >>>>>> dems want the votes of those good folks so they keep 'em on the
> >> >> >>>>>> payroll.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> That was an ignorant, racist, and Rethuglican comment to add to
> >> >> >>>>> that
> >> >> >>>>> troll
> >> >> >>>>> post.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> But that's our Gorge. Just one of HTown's resident fascist
> >> >> >>>>> enablers.
> >> >> >>>>> You can almost smell the fear.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Fascist enablers. Heh, good one.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Surely you aware that NO had a bad reputation as a high-crime
> >> >> >>>> city,
> >> >> >>>> based on, well, facts.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Yes, I was/am aware. I was attacked on my honeymoon there, and
> >> >> >>> lost
> >> >> >>> my
> >> >> >>> wallet to a gang. It took years to deal with the ID theft and
> >> >> >>> subsequent
> >> >> >>> clones of my personhood.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Ya think the criminal element cleaned up their act when they
> >> >> >>>> moved?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> No. A leopard can't change its spots. HTown was victimized, but I
> >> >> >>> was
> >> >> >>> hoping
> >> >> >>> that the evacuees would be vetted a lot more carefully by Fed,
> >> >> >>> State,
> >> >> >>> and
> >> >> >>> local law enforcement, and the large numbers of miscreants would
> >> >> >>> be
> >> >> >>> segregated and dealt with. To scatter them into the general
> >> >> >>> population
> >> >> >>> was
> >> >> >>> the real mistake. The inability of the Fed to respond by providing
> >> >> >>> facilities in Louisiana for their return was the biggest
> >> >> >>> mistake...
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Why izzit always the "feds" responsibility to cure all our ills?
> >> >> >> Oh,
> >> >> >> I
> >> >> >> know! You were brought up to suck on the endless teat, eh?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> JT
> >> >> > Yep - this one was raised by a sheep. BAHHHH!
> >> >>
> >> >> And speaking of sheep, howz that infatuation with GWB and the
> >> >> Rethuglican
> >> >> party workin' out for ya? Are you enjoying your shearing?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am no fan of GWB but I do respect the practice of personal
> >> > responsibility, a practice BTW seldom observed in the nanny based
> >> > liberal world.
> >>
> >> I respect personal responsibility. I object to corporations getting
> >> welfare
> >> and skipping on their tax obligations while they are gutting us, saddling
> >> us
> >> with enormous debts, outsourcing our jobs, wrecking our manufacturing
> >> base,
> >> robbing our children of their futures, and destroying our only home,
> >> planet
> >> Earth.
> >>
> >
> > The only responsibility ANY business has is to make a profit legally.
>
> Agreed: but Big Bidness has subverted the 'law': Offshoring to avoid taxes,
> little or no re-investment in their infrastructure ( BP ) , welching on
> their obligations to pensions,
> etc. The 'laws' ( gutted by lobbies ) need to be re-examined.
> 'Legal' doesn't equal right and fair any longer.
>
> >> It is time to destroy the criminal enterprise of the
> >> Industrial/Media/GOVERNMENT
> >> complex, and demand a little corporate/government responsibilty.
> >>
> >
> > Destroy the incentive for business, and you will have the same malaize
> > as the old Soviet Union...
>
> Responsibilties, defined and enforced, will not change the fundementals of
> supply and demand.
> >
> >
> >
> >> It IS an act of personal responsibility, and our public responsibility,
> >> to
> >> demand that the entire Fascist cabal be impeached, indicted, and
> >> imprisoned.
> >>
> >
> > You had better include the anti business edicts passed by Democrats over
> > the years.
>
> Legislating responsible and ethical business practices isn't a hallmark of
> fascism.
> >
> >
> >
> >> > Should the Democrats produce a viable candidate, my support will be
> >> > forthcoming...
> >>
> >> Check out General Clark....he would make a fine candidate.
> >>
> >
> > General Clark is held in disdain by his fellow military veterans
> > (including me). In fact he was fired by Clinton after nearly starting a
> > war with the Russians over a silly incident in the former Yugoslavia.
>
> And you will find equally supportive numbers of the Military for Gen. Clark.
> Check your claim that Clinton initiated the 'firing' of Clark. Bill
> remembers it differently.
> "....a setup, engineered by Cohen's office and by the Chiefs. As for
> Clinton, "He was hornswoggled." attr: Sandy Berger.
>


If he was "hornswoggled," he wasn't/isn't very bright.

JT

In article <%6CKg.5782$yO7.3259@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
"pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> news:yeah_uh-hu-204C1C.20160802092006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <gaoKg.7695$q63.4447@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Suburbanaristic" <yeah_uh-hu@wohoo.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> > Nope, I voted for Bush, -
> >
> >
> >> You actually ADMIT to voting for Shrub? Hahahahaha....Waaahahahahaha!!!!
> >
> > Yeah.
> >
> > I take it you vote for losers, but assume a last laugh somehow.
>
> I voted for the REAL winner.

I suspect that election has a lot to do with the current explosion of
overemotion and illogic from the left - which has never been know to be
very logical in the first place.

You had your candy taken away, and you just can't get over it.


> >> was simply "shaking up the status-quo in the mid-east.", Bush was
> >> actually
> >> spilling the blood of our National Guard troops while squandering our
> >> treasure in his illegal invasion of a soveriegn nation. This clusterfuck
> >> is
> >> costing US $195 million per day!!!!
> >
> > I suggest you compare historical cost of war as compared to GDP for
> > starters. Get back to me on economics after careful study.
>
> That doesn't change the fact that we are pissing away blood and treasure at
> an astounding rate: and should the ecomony crash ( it will, soon ), GDP will
> also crash making the comparison an imbarrassing false assumption.

Some fringe economists may see a crash, but in reality, the economy just
follows the usual cycles. Predicting in vague terms that the economy
will follow an inherent cycle is like the revalation that the sun will
rise eventually.


>
> >
> > Start at WW2, which consumed close to 50% of GDP. and work your way up.
>
> You are ignoring the cost of oil....that surely changes the equasion.

In reality, gas prices are not astronomical. Europe pays double what we
do in order to support social spending. It's not the gas prices that are
affecting their long-term economic viability, it's their socialist
policies.

You'll rarely see a lefty compare our economic outlook with that of
Europe - it's something they'd rather not discuss, because it puts
socialism in a bad light. So, they convince themselves that the sky is
falling on this side of the pond.

It may not be factual, but that isn't important. What's important is
validation of their political philosophy, and the rest of us know it
more than ever, because the dem party has gone farther left and provided
nitwits with a bigger soap box.


> >> You are a fascist enabler. The lowest scum on the planet. A traitor to
> >> the
> >> Constitution, and America.
> >> Still feel good about that vote for armageddon, putz?
> >
> > Well, I am seeking your endorsement, obviously.
>
> You lose.

Whew. Dodged a bullet.


> >> > You are apparently pro-impeachment. Regardless of your reasons, I can
> >> > assure you that your enemies see that as support for them, whether you
> >> > like it or not.
> >>
> >> I can assure you that we see your support for the illegal BFEE putsch
> >> as a direct assault on the very ideals this nation was founded on. That
> >> makes you a traitor.
> >
> > Perhaps we should take poll, comrade. Are you or are you not an idiot
> > wandering with a stolen market cart full of discarded leftist bullshit?
> >
> > I say yes.
>
> And your opinion is in the minority ( as is your Fascist party ).
> Enjoy the joyride to irrelevance.

Actually, the Republican party is much more efficient at the elimination
of threats, they have the fortitude to do what liberal dem's are too
squishy to do.

--
The lawless will be given wide berth: the more lawless the wider the berth.

--Wrethcard the Cat.

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:30:07 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
>"Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>news:44fa27be.52247281@news.prodigy.net...
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on freepin'
>>>>>>>Town
>>>>>>>Hall?
>>>>>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>>>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>>>
>>>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>>>
>>>I can in two sentences:
>>>I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>>>She didn't see the same movie I did.
>>
>> You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
>> glasses at the time?
>
>She's a RW shill who bent the truth in her 'review' ( smear ).

Be specific, what did she bend? Which of Spike' commissions and
omissions as cited by her are untrue?

>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/060904crci_cinema
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>>>>>> (NYTimes?)
>>>>>
>>>>>You ARE clueless, aren't you. Wow....
>>>>
>>>> Non-responsive.
>>>
>>>Your Honor, I stand by my statement. He IS clueless.
>>>"New Yawker? Are they associated with the Pravda Of The West
>>> (NYTimes?)" shows me ( and by extention, all readers of your
>>>pig-squeezings )
>>> that you haven't quite got a lock on the realationship between the two,
>>>or even the existance of the two. Baliff, whack his pee-pee.
>>
>> New Yawker .... NYTimes ... both scumbag extensions of Walter Duranty,
>> comrade.
>
>Moran: (1) He was a reporter for the NYT in the 30s (2) he died in 1957
>(3) He was not in management, nor was he owner or publisher or EITHER
>the NYT of the NYr.

He and the NYT had a love affair with Josie Stalin.

Much hasn't changed with the NYT.


>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>You really should watch 'When the Levees Broke', and perhaps learn a
>>>>>>>thing
>>>>>>>or two.
>>>>>>>Spike is fair spreading the blame for the failures of Government -
>>>>>>>both
>>>>>>>Dem.
>>>>>>>and Rep.
>>>>>>>When the levees broke, Shrubs credibility was washed away....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Betcha got the bulk of yer edumacayshun from MTV
>>>>>
>>>>>What a witty rejoinder. Why, I can hear the spirits of the Algonquin
>>>>>Roundtable chuckling over your bon mot.
>>>>
>>>> I got you pegged. Yo momma was an unwashed hippie dirtball who sat
>>>> you on her knee and regaled you with tales of the glory days: spitting
>>>> on Vietnam vets, trippin', and of course screwing the head of the
>>>> local Black Panther Party on the front steps of the courthouse during
>>>> a Black Power demonstration.
>>>
>>>The only thing you could peg would would be a round hole....
>>
>> Bet yo mama still has pictures of Rap, Stoke, Huey and Bobby on her
>> bedroom wall.
>
>Your debating/persuasive writing skills are on par with a illiterate
>Bolivian shoemaker.
>( with heartfelt apologies to all illiterate Bolivian shoemakers perusing
>this post )

Bet she gave sympathy fucks to the reluctant draftees.

>>
>>>> Bet she gave ya the middle name of "Moonbeam."
>>
>> Bet she told you to worship at the pedestal of appeasement.
>
>Your desperate act of Defending the indefensible IS fascist Appeasement.
>Enjoy the wild ride down to ignoble irrelivance.

But you didn't hear her whine for gender equality when the boyz were
being drafted while the coeds were marching off to job interviews.


>>
>>>You lose that bet. Want to go 'Double or Nothin'? Do you have a Paypal
>>>account?
>>>Are you old enough to gamble on the internets and tubes and stuff?
>>
>> Bet she instilled in you the doctrines of share the wealth, dumb down
>> the curriculum in the name of diversity, and moral relativism.
>
>Quite the opposite.

Not to mention appease those who are trying to kill us, else they may
get mad at us.

>>>> And, having missed all that, you're bitter.
>>>>
>>>>>>>Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the truth of the
>>>>>>>message too harsh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean the very black Ms. Parker?
>>>>>
>>>>>I did not bring her race into this: you did, you rascist rascal...
>>>>
>>>> Actually, you brought up the Spikester's race.
>>>
>>>No, I asked YOU " Did you object to the color of the film-maker, or is the
>>>truth of the
>>>message too harsh? ", and then you responded with a non-sequitur
>>>introducing
>>>the topic of Ms parkers race. Do try to keep up.....
>>
>> Nope. You trotted out the race card first.
>>
>> But got yer ass trumped upon learning the Star Parker's a sistah.
>
>Her race is not important: her veracity IS. Her 'opinions' are designed to
>denegrate Spike's film, and have been debunked by real critics ( not
>partisan attack-dogs ), and the people who have survived the ShrubCo
>debacle. Those are their own words on screen, not Spike's....

Real critics? Oh you mean Mikey Moore, the Cannes Film Festival, and
the limousine liberals who rule Tinseltown today.

You know ... the folks who want gun control but have arsenals in their
homes, tell us to integrate while living in lily-white gated
communities, and deny us our SUVs as they roll around in limos.

Not to mention rolling hunger strikes to protest our right-wing ways.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let's face it: the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051214b.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>Uhhh....and what was that in response to? I didn't mention, question, or
>>>>>speculate on race.
>>>>>But I DID say " the entire ShrubCo crime family has to go, and soon. "
>>>>
>>>> Just more evidence to discredit the race-whining Spike.
>>>
>>>You REALLY need to work on your rhetorical skills.
>>>See 'non-sequitor' in any dictionary without pictures, M'Kay?
>>
>> Sequitor? Not in any English dictionary, Senor.
>
>Typo. Mea Culpa, Asshole.
>I guess I'll have to upgrade this ol' box to get a smell-checkor.
>I do pretty well without it.....
>Without spelling flames you would be hard pressed to attack your betters.

Meanwhile, you snip substance and insult.

Not much better than the kids in de schoolyard rappin de dozens.

Whigger.

>
>>>>>Don't you have some ShrubCo sycophant ( look it up...) to suck?
>>>>>Good luck on yer way down, loser.
>>>>
>>>> Gawd but I luv crushing leftists and whiggers.
>>>
>>>The only thing you seem to be 'crushing' is your credibility,
>>> or any claim to equality in discussions with your betters.
>>>But, if you have nuthin' to lose.....
>>
>> All you can do is sling insults, senor.
>
>And crush mental midget rascists. It's fun, but it leaves mung on the bottom
>of my shoes.

You misspelled "realist." Get dat spellchecker fixed.

The only institutional bias is directed toward white hetero
non-Hispanic, non-Islamic males in the form of affirmative action
policies for damn near everyone else.


>> That's what leftists tend to do.
>
>No, that's what intelligent free-thinkers do when confronted with rascist
>Fascists.

You misspelled "realist" again.


And speaking of free thinkers: well-intentioned liberals came into
control with their lofty ideas of civil rights, gender equality,
concern for the environment, etc. but they went too far and destroyed
human motivation and a sense of personal responsibility. JFK/LBJ
wanted to give us "The Great Society" promising us cradle-to-grave
entitlement but it did nothing but create a welfare State along with
mindsets of "You owes us, " and "I beez an angry victim wif a chip on
muh shoulder." The mainstream media supported this leftism and
brainwashed most of you into believing that there is still a white
oppressor / non-white victim system in place. They do it to this very
day.

Black out of wedlock rate 1963: 25%; today 70%.

Then you wonder why the racial educational gap is widening. Pappy's
out spreading his seed all over town showing his macho instead of
staying home and ensuring that little Eboneesha and Shantavious are
going to school, and studing they's all ciphers and letters.


"
>>>IMPEACH, INDICT, and IMPRISON the BushCo Junta.
>>>( and kick their fascist enablers in the nuts, too! )
>>
>> Open Borders Bush is a disgrace.
>
>Agree! ShrubCo is a disgrace AND a monumental failure.

Yeah, like the way he supported set asides in Adarand v. Mineta, took
a soft stance against affirmative action in Gratz v. Bollinger and
Grutter v. Bollinger, and trips over his dick for the "preferred"
minority vote.

>> Too fucking liberal for starters.
>
>Too Fascist for me. Too liberal for moran fascists....

That's because you're a brainwashed liberal ... and a whigger to boot.

 
"Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
news:44fb0d75.23394203@news.prodigy.net...
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:30:07 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>news:44fa27be.52247281@news.prodigy.net...
>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on
>>>>>>>>freepin'
>>>>>>>>Town
>>>>>>>>Hall?
>>>>>>>>Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>>>>'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>>>>
>>>>I can in two sentences:
>>>>I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>>>>She didn't see the same movie I did.
>>>
>>> You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
>>> glasses at the time?
>>
>>She's a RW shill who bent the truth in her 'review' ( smear ).
>
> Be specific, what did she bend? Which of Spike' commissions and
> omissions as cited by her are untrue?

Sorry, I don't accept your invation to argue with you pigs in a rascist
mudpit.
Fuck you very much, you frightened fascists!

 


On 9/3/06 1:34 PM, in article VeFKg.925$MF1.840@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net,
"pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
> "Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
> news:44fb0d75.23394203@news.prodigy.net...
>> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:30:07 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>> news:44fa27be.52247281@news.prodigy.net...
>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on
>>>>>>>>> freepin'
>>>>>>>>> Town
>>>>>>>>> Hall?
>>>>>>>>> Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>>>>> 'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can in two sentences:
>>>>> I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>>>>> She didn't see the same movie I did.
>>>>
>>>> You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
>>>> glasses at the time?
>>>
>>> She's a RW shill who bent the truth in her 'review' ( smear ).
>>
>> Be specific, what did she bend? Which of Spike' commissions and
>> omissions as cited by her are untrue?
>
> Sorry, I don't accept your invation to argue with you pigs in a rascist
> mudpit.
> Fuck you very much, you frightened fascists!
TRANSLATION: "I don't have anything but cursing insults.
Naaa-na-na-na-naaaw!"


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

chillin'@home.net (Way Back Jack) wrotenews:44f81c1c.3555953
@free.teranews.com:

> First thing you noticed were the songs played over the stadium's audio
> system: "South Of The Border," "El Rancho Rock," "La Bamba," and "La
> Cucaracha." The camera panned the fans and all you could see were
> people with dark hair, brown skin, small eyes, fleshy cheeks, and
> flabby physiques. My Gawd!! the place was lousy with Mexicans. Any
> white people still in Texas? Hello? It also makes you wonder how
> they could afford to attend a major league baseball game. Must have a
> generous welfare package in the Lone Star State.
>

Must be some free ticket giveaways by racist american corporations trying to
curry latino favor.

--
b{-_-}d

I'm listening!

---Mapanari---

"Peter Principle" <petesfeats@SNIPMEgmail.com> wrotenews:jX%Jg.10668
$dl.9514@tornado.texas.rr.com:

> Way Back Jack wrote:
>> First thing you noticed were the songs played over the stadium's audio
>> system: "South Of The Border," "El Rancho Rock," "La Bamba," and "La
>> Cucaracha." The camera panned the fans and all you could see were
>> people with dark hair, brown skin, small eyes, fleshy cheeks, and
>> flabby physiques. My Gawd!! the place was lousy with Mexicans. Any
>> white people still in Texas? Hello? It also makes you wonder how
>> they could afford to attend a major league baseball game. Must have a
>> generous welfare package in the Lone Star State.
>
> <PLONK!>
>
> One more nasty little Nazi fucknut troll gone...
>

Ooooo! We're all impressed with your ostrich-like closed mind!

See something you don't like? You just plonk it like a good old AOl moron.

--
b{-_-}d

I'm listening!

---Mapanari---

 
"George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:C120944D.730E%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
>
>
>
> On 9/3/06 1:34 PM, in article
> VeFKg.925$MF1.840@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net,
> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>> news:44fb0d75.23394203@news.prodigy.net...
>>> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:30:07 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Way Back Jack" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:44fa27be.52247281@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:23:23 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:44f9dbff.32781468@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:15:22 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Two Evils" <chillin'@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:44f9c463.26662312@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:24:10 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Bush, A Lesser Of Evils" <nospam@home.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:44f9b69a.23132812@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:23:37 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>>>>>>>>>>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The lying left in action again. And of course the sheep that
>>>>>>>>>>> Americans have become will buy into it.
>>>>>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Katrina, lies and videotape
>>>>>>>>>>> By Star Parker
>>>>>>>>>>> Monday, August 28, 2006
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TownHall.com? You sourced your cut'n'run ...er cut'n'paste on
>>>>>>>>>> freepin'
>>>>>>>>>> Town
>>>>>>>>>> Hall?
>>>>>>>>>> Geezus...... here's a fair review
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Refute Ms. Parker, twinky.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry: I don't wrestle pigs at your urging.
>>>>>>>> 'I Know! Let's you and him have a fight!'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Translation: You can't refute her statements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can in two sentences:
>>>>>> I have read her 'review' and I have seen the movie.
>>>>>> She didn't see the same movie I did.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean that she wasn't wearing her her left-wing tunnel vision
>>>>> glasses at the time?
>>>>
>>>> She's a RW shill who bent the truth in her 'review' ( smear ).
>>>
>>> Be specific, what did she bend? Which of Spike' commissions and
>>> omissions as cited by her are untrue?
>>
>> Sorry, I don't accept your invation to argue with you pigs in a rascist
>> mudpit.
>> Fuck you very much, you frightened fascists!
> TRANSLATION: "I don't have anything but cursing insults.
> Naaa-na-na-na-naaaw!"
I stand by my opinion: I saw the movie, and then read her 'review'.
She didn't see the same movie America watched.
...
and, though I refuse to be drawn in to a wrastlin' match with rascist pigs,
I'll still make the time to kick you in your shriveled nutsack, you
frightened fascist.

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:34:29 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:


>> Be specific, what did she bend? Which of Spike' commissions and
>> omissions as cited by her are untrue?
>
>Sorry, I don't accept your invation to argue with you pigs in a rascist
>mudpit.
>Fuck you very much, you frightened fascists!

Bingo!

You cannot refute her truth.

And by the way, another poster correctly pointed out that liberals are
the true racists:

" ... To which I might add
that this "modern" phenomenon, this new minstrel show, is provided
courtesy of the liberal whiggers, their new Massas. And if anyone is
delusional enough to think it's racists laughing at these pathetic
buffoons, I have news for them. These childlike ignoramuses are
dancing for their dinner to please that liberal crowd extorting tax
money from us to keep 'em drugged, stupid, on welfare and, most
important of all, voting en masse for them in every election. This is
how it works, the new racist model, and black behavior lends credence
to stupid label they deny. You cannot be very bright if you don't
recognize just who it is that's enslaving you and promoting those
social pathologies which are destroying your own people."