Portada Terra USA > Foros

Conducta

Tu Conducta en Los Foros Terra

  • 1. No publicarás Pedofilia, SPAM o Prostitución
  • 2. No postearás mensajes/fotos Pornográficas o Violentas
  • 3. Reportarás todo mensaje abusivo en "Reportar Abuso"
  • Ver más
Para hacer login haz clic aquí. Si aun no eres usuario de Terra, regístrate aquí
Foros  >  Houston  > 

 

 

Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 14, 2006, 8:20 PM


Reportar Abuso
On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
<mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Reasons already verified:
>
>1. Lying to start a War.

Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.

>
>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.

Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>
>3. Depleted Uranium

Not a problem.


Yes, folks... Liberals ARE this stupid!

Mike Smith
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 15, 2006, 6:59 AM


Reportar Abuso
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:21:41 -0500, Strabo <strabo@flashlight.net>
wrote:

>Mike Smith wrote:
>> On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>> <mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Reasons already verified:
>>>
>>> 1. Lying to start a War.
>>
>> Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
> >
>You're going to prove a negative?

Any "proof" this Mobius bozo can produce can be easily refuted.

>
>>
>>> 2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>
>> Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>> within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
> >
>
>>> 3. Depleted Uranium
>>
>> Not a problem.
>>
>>
>> Yes, folks... Liberals ARE this stupid!
>>
>> Mike Smith
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
"Billary/2008"


Nov 15, 2006, 9:18 AM


Reportar Abuso
In the meantime:

FBI Tape Reveals John Murtha's Role in Abscam Scandal
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,217305,00.html



Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Obwon


Nov 15, 2006, 2:35 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Reasons already verified:
>>
>>1. Lying to start a War.
>
>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.

Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
into the SOU???
>>
>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>
>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.

It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
was illegal.

>>3. Depleted Uranium
>
>Not a problem.

Only to you because you're here at home and not
an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
the dust.
>
>Yes, folks... Liberals ARE this stupid!
>
>Mike Smith

What are you?
O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
"You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those are the ones
you want to concentrate on".
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/george_w._bush/

O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
George W. Bush quotes
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 15, 2006, 5:37 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>
>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>
>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>
>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>into the SOU???

This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
quote where Bush lied.

>>>
>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>
>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>
> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>was illegal.

Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.

>
>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>
>>Not a problem.
>
> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>the dust.

Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
caused damage to our troops.



I know {and most of you know} this buffoon won't be posting any
"proof", based on the fact that liberals simply do not know what
"proof" means.


Mike Smith
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Obwon


Nov 16, 2006, 1:42 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>
>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>
>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>
>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>into the SOU???
>
>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>quote where Bush lied.

If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
much else you missed.

>>>>
>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>
>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.

Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
back to the congress.

>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>was illegal.
>
>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.

Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
google it for yourself? You might google a few other
subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
what else you missed and/or don't know.
>>
>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>
>>>Not a problem.
>>
>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>the dust.
>
>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>caused damage to our troops.
>
Again, you'd have to be braindead to be interested
in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
your own research and you won't look so ignorant
and/or foolish in public.
>
>I know {and most of you know} this buffoon won't be posting any
>"proof", based on the fact that liberals simply do not know what
>"proof" means.
>
>
>Mike Smith

O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
"You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those are the ones
you want to concentrate on".
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/george_w._bush/

O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
George W. Bush quotes
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 16, 2006, 2:37 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:42:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>>
>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>>
>>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>>into the SOU???
>>
>>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>>quote where Bush lied.
>
>If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
>it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
>playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
>much else you missed.

Yes, I feel your frustration with your failure to find what you
thought was there. I realize, in common liberal-speak, it is accepted
as a known "truth". Unfortunately, most "liberal-speak truths" are not
truths at all.

>
>>>>>
>>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>>
>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>
> Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
>matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
>back to the congress.

Does USSC rulings confuse you? Of course they do... you have a serious
lack of common sense and logic, inhibiting your absorption of
knowledge.

>
>>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>>was illegal.
>>
>>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.
>
>Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
>of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
>you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
>google it for yourself? You might google a few other
>subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
>what else you missed and/or don't know.

I did google it. That's why I know you are blowing the typical
liberal-speak bullshit.

>>>
>>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>>
>>>>Not a problem.
>>>
>>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>>the dust.
>>
>>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>>caused damage to our troops.
>>
>Again, you'd have to be braindead to be interested
>in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
>your own research and you won't look so ignorant
>and/or foolish in public.

As expected... you have nothing. Don't "feel" bad. You are not alone.
hundreds of thousands of liberals have the same "research" problem
that you have.

Mike Smith
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
"pitchforks and torches"


Nov 16, 2006, 8:06 PM


Reportar Abuso
 
"Mike Smith" <mws@wt.net> wrote in message
news:n1epl258u4apsbd2v9h1lovga4dvlm245p@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:42:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>>>
>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>>>
>>>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>>>into the SOU???
>>>
>>>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>>>quote where Bush lied.

Fish in a barrel:
"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability,
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

>>
>>If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
>>it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
>>playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
>>much else you missed.
>
> Yes, I feel your frustration with your failure to find what you
> thought was there. I realize, in common liberal-speak, it is accepted
> as a known "truth". Unfortunately, most "liberal-speak truths" are not
> truths at all.
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>>>
>>>>>Never happened.

You are attempting to link the two; twon't work here...
Shrub illegally spied on Americans - Fact

>>>>>There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.

And, in addition to this specific authority, ShrubCo illegally claimed the
authority to
break the laws of the land. ShrubCo illegally tapped into American's
communications without any
concerns 'bout any of the laws, like FISA.....he spied ILLEGALLY on
Americans.


>>
>> Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
>>matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
>>back to the congress.
>
> Does USSC rulings confuse you? Of course they do... you have a serious
> lack of common sense and logic, inhibiting your absorption of
> knowledge.

Dear Deadender: there is no confusion about the court ruling.
The only confusion here is yours.
>
>>
>>>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>>>was illegal.
>>>
>>>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.

Here ya go, Shitty: shake hands with it. It's all there....
On 17 August 2006, District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled that the NSA
surveillance program, specifically involving "international telephone and
internet communications of numerous persons and organizations" within the
United States of America, was unconstitutional and illegal, and ordered that
it be halted immediately.

Soooo much more here.............
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACLU_v._NSA

>>
>>Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
>>of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
>>you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
>>google it for yourself? You might google a few other
>>subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
>>what else you missed and/or don't know.
>
> I did google it. That's why I know you are blowing the typical
> liberal-speak bullshit.

Whatta complete dead-ender. Fighting utter defeat to bitter end, the boy
soldiers and old men
are rushed to the ramparts to lob smokebombs..... and Mikey is there, in
his freshly starched brownshirt, fighting reality.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>>>
>>>>>Not a problem.
>>>>
>>>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>>>the dust.
>>>
>>>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>>>caused damage to our troops.
>>>
>>Again, you'd have to be brain-dead to be interested
>>in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
>>your own research and you won't look so ignorant
>>and/or foolish in public.
>
> As expected... you have nothing.

Hell, Shitty, go ahead... embarrass yerself publicly.
You failed to do ANY research, You failed to attempt ANY rebuttal for your
specious claim,
and you have failed to even address the issue. You spouted some RushCum,
and now you look even more ignorant and foolish in public.
Mission Accomplished, eh?


>he Don't "feel" bad. You are not alone.
> hundreds of thousands of liberals have the same "research" problem
> that you have.

But only a handful of willfully ignorant Rethuglican't dead-enders share
your 'special' state of reality.
Some of 'em sit in front of microphones lying to YOU....They are enablers.
You are their tool.
They need to be gathered up, indicted, and imprisoned along with the entire
Bush regime.
You need to be bitchslapped by the truth. And I hope it hurts.....
>
> Mike Smith


Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Obwon


Nov 17, 2006, 1:18 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:37:23 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:42:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>>>
>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>>>
>>>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>>>into the SOU???
>>>
>>>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>>>quote where Bush lied.
>>
>>If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
>>it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
>>playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
>>much else you missed.
>
>Yes, I feel your frustration with your failure to find what you
>thought was there. I realize, in common liberal-speak, it is accepted
>as a known "truth". Unfortunately, most "liberal-speak truths" are not
>truths at all.
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>>>
>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>>
>> Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
>>matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
>>back to the congress.
>
>Does USSC rulings confuse you? Of course they do... you have a serious
>lack of common sense and logic, inhibiting your absorption of
>knowledge.
>
>>
>>>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>>>was illegal.
>>>
>>>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.
>>
>>Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
>>of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
>>you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
>>google it for yourself? You might google a few other
>>subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
>>what else you missed and/or don't know.
>
>I did google it. That's why I know you are blowing the typical
>liberal-speak bullshit.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>>>
>>>>>Not a problem.
>>>>
>>>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>>>the dust.
>>>
>>>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>>>caused damage to our troops.
>>>
>>Again, you'd have to be braindead to be interested
>>in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
>>your own research and you won't look so ignorant
>>and/or foolish in public.
>
>As expected... you have nothing. Don't "feel" bad. You are not alone.
>hundreds of thousands of liberals have the same "research" problem
>that you have.
>
>Mike Smith

I've been reading your postings for a while now,
enough to know that you aren't interested in open
and honest debate, okay? So, trying to inform you
of things you should already know, is an exercise
in futility. As everyone here well knows.

Obwon
O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
"You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those are the ones
you want to concentrate on".
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/george_w._bush/

O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
George W. Bush quotes
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Obwon


Nov 17, 2006, 3:00 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:06:44 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
>"Mike Smith" <mws@wt.net> wrote in message
>news:n1epl258u4apsbd2v9h1lovga4dvlm245p@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:42:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>>>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>>>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>>>>into the SOU???
>>>>
>>>>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>>>>quote where Bush lied.
>
>Fish in a barrel:
> "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of
>President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability,
>preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Pitchforks... What he's looking for is not to be found
in so many words, but if one googles "sixteen words"
and follows up that search with a search of the 2001 SOU,
and George Tenets connection to it, here's what you can
easily extract from the readings;

1. Bush said he wasn't responsible for those 16 words
getting into his SOU, he refused to tell us who was.

2. George Tenet stepped forward to take the blame
for letting those words get in, Bush then said he
considered that admission to be the end of the matter.

3. Reporters, examining the records discover that
George Tenet had warned Bush, in October of the
previous year, that the information was "questionable"
and that it should not be used because it was "unreliable".

4. Bush, finally admitted that he put that statement back in,
even though he'd been warned not to use it!

In anyone's "book" that's lying!!! Of course, the media
let the matter drop and never bothered to call Bush on it.
>>>
>>>If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
>>>it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
>>>playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
>>>much else you missed.
>>
>> Yes, I feel your frustration with your failure to find what you
>> thought was there. I realize, in common liberal-speak, it is accepted
>> as a known "truth". Unfortunately, most "liberal-speak truths" are not
>> truths at all.
>>
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Never happened.
>
>You are attempting to link the two; twon't work here...
>Shrub illegally spied on Americans - Fact
>
>>>>>>There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>
>And, in addition to this specific authority, ShrubCo illegally claimed the
>authority to
>break the laws of the land. ShrubCo illegally tapped into American's
>communications without any
>concerns 'bout any of the laws, like FISA.....he spied ILLEGALLY on
>Americans.
>
>
>>>
>>> Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
>>>matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
>>>back to the congress.
>>
>> Does USSC rulings confuse you? Of course they do... you have a serious
>> lack of common sense and logic, inhibiting your absorption of
>> knowledge.
>
>Dear Deadender: there is no confusion about the court ruling.
>The only confusion here is yours.
>>
>>>
>>>>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>>>>was illegal.
>>>>
>>>>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.
>
>Here ya go, Shitty: shake hands with it. It's all there....
>On 17 August 2006, District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled that the NSA
>surveillance program, specifically involving "international telephone and
>internet communications of numerous persons and organizations" within the
>United States of America, was unconstitutional and illegal, and ordered that
>it be halted immediately.
>
>Soooo much more here.............
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACLU_v._NSA
>
>>>
>>>Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
>>>of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
>>>you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
>>>google it for yourself? You might google a few other
>>>subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
>>>what else you missed and/or don't know.
>>
>> I did google it. That's why I know you are blowing the typical
>> liberal-speak bullshit.
>
>Whatta complete dead-ender. Fighting utter defeat to bitter end, the boy
>soldiers and old men
>are rushed to the ramparts to lob smokebombs..... and Mikey is there, in
>his freshly starched brownshirt, fighting reality.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>>>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>>>>the dust.
>>>>
>>>>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>>>>caused damage to our troops.
>>>>
>>>Again, you'd have to be brain-dead to be interested
>>>in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
>>>your own research and you won't look so ignorant
>>>and/or foolish in public.
>>
>> As expected... you have nothing.
>
>Hell, Shitty, go ahead... embarrass yerself publicly.
>You failed to do ANY research, You failed to attempt ANY rebuttal for your
>specious claim,
>and you have failed to even address the issue. You spouted some RushCum,
>and now you look even more ignorant and foolish in public.
>Mission Accomplished, eh?
>
>
>>he Don't "feel" bad. You are not alone.
>> hundreds of thousands of liberals have the same "research" problem
>> that you have.
>
>But only a handful of willfully ignorant Rethuglican't dead-enders share
>your 'special' state of reality.
>Some of 'em sit in front of microphones lying to YOU....They are enablers.
>You are their tool.
>They need to be gathered up, indicted, and imprisoned along with the entire
>Bush regime.
>You need to be bitchslapped by the truth. And I hope it hurts.....
>>
>> Mike Smith
>
In any event, even when Mike Smith is confronted
with the facts and evidence, he still fails to understand
it, and he still will continue to deny it. No one takes him
serously anymore, and they only reply to him when they
want to get something off their chests, otherwise his
posts are useless to one and all. They do not inform
those who would take his side, and if they accept any
of his premises etc., they'll soon discover they'll be
looking like fools themselves, so they too learn to
stay away from him.

Good luck.
Obwon
O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
"You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those are the ones
you want to concentrate on".
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/george_w._bush/

O][ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ][O
George W. Bush quotes
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 17, 2006, 8:29 PM


Reportar Abuso
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:18:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:37:23 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:42:03 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:37:50 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:35:06 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:26 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 14 Nov 2006 15:11:25 -0800, "Möbius Pretzel"
>>>>>><mobius_pretzel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Reasons already verified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1. Lying to start a War.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush did not lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad for you... He admitted he did, didn't you hear
>>>>>what he said about putting "The British have learned..."
>>>>>into the SOU???
>>>>
>>>>This is simple. All you have to do to prove me wrong is post the
>>>>quote where Bush lied.
>>>
>>>If you didn't hear it yourself, you are too brain dead for
>>>it to mean anything to have me post it. But thanks for
>>>playing. You just weren't listening eh? Guess how
>>>much else you missed.
>>
>>Yes, I feel your frustration with your failure to find what you
>>thought was there. I realize, in common liberal-speak, it is accepted
>>as a known "truth". Unfortunately, most "liberal-speak truths" are not
>>truths at all.
>>
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>2. Illegal Spying on Americans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Never happened. There is ironclad proof that Bush was completely
>>>>>>within his authority to listen in on KNOWN al qaeda communications.
>>>
>>> Once again you prove your own ignorance, the
>>>matter was decided by the USSC who sent the matter
>>>back to the congress.
>>
>>Does USSC rulings confuse you? Of course they do... you have a serious
>>lack of common sense and logic, inhibiting your absorption of
>>knowledge.
>>
>>>
>>>>> It's already been determined by the USSC that the spying
>>>>>was illegal.
>>>>
>>>>Again... all you have to do to prove me wrong is post the ruling.
>>>
>>>Again, if you don't already know it, aren't already aware
>>>of the truth of the matter, as interested in it as you appear to be,
>>>you have to have been brain dead, why don't you just go
>>>google it for yourself? You might google a few other
>>>subjects that you seem to be interested in, and learn
>>>what else you missed and/or don't know.
>>
>>I did google it. That's why I know you are blowing the typical
>>liberal-speak bullshit.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>3. Depleted Uranium
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only to you because you're here at home and not
>>>>>an American Soldier over there who has to breathe
>>>>>the dust.
>>>>
>>>>Again, all you have to do is post the proof that depleted uranium has
>>>>caused damage to our troops.
>>>>
>>>Again, you'd have to be braindead to be interested
>>>in this matter and not already know the answer. Do
>>>your own research and you won't look so ignorant
>>>and/or foolish in public.
>>
>>As expected... you have nothing. Don't "feel" bad. You are not alone.
>>hundreds of thousands of liberals have the same "research" problem
>>that you have.
>>
>>Mike Smith
>
> I've been reading your postings for a while now,
>enough to know that you aren't interested in open
>and honest debate, okay? So, trying to inform you
>of things you should already know, is an exercise
>in futility. As everyone here well knows.
>
>Obwon


So you got absolutely nothing... Not a single rational argument or
cite to back up your mindless bullshit.

Not to worry... You're just like hundreds of thousands of other
liberals that adhere to liberal-speak and "think" it is accurate,
until you actually attempt to look up the facts, and cannot find them.
It is expected.

I feel your pain.

Mike Smith
Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
eib10025@yahoo.com


Nov 18, 2006, 3:51 AM


Reportar Abuso
 
Billary/2008 wrote:
> In the meantime:
>
> FBI Tape Reveals John Murtha's Role in Abscam Scandal
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,217305,00.html

OMG! Murtha should step down!

Re: FAX THIS! - "Impeach Them Or We Will Impeach YOU!"
Mike Smith


Nov 18, 2006, 6:13 AM


Reportar Abuso
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:00:25 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:

>What he's looking for is not to be found
>in so many words, but if one googles "sixteen words"
>and follows up that search with a search of the 2001 SOU,
>and George Tenets connection to it, here's what you can
>easily extract from the readings;

Don't try to analyze what was said. You simply are not capable of
that. Your brain is not wired up in a manner to allow you to make
those types of connections.

>
>1. Bush said he wasn't responsible for those 16 words
>getting into his SOU, he refused to tell us who was.

Do you have these fantasies often???
Free clue: The President is responsible for EVERYTHING he states.

>
>2. George Tenet stepped forward to take the blame
>for letting those words get in, Bush then said he
>considered that admission to be the end of the matter.

Blame? Why "blame"? The words were accurate.

>
>3. Reporters, examining the records discover that
>George Tenet had warned Bush, in October of the
>previous year, that the information was "questionable"
>and that it should not be used because it was "unreliable".

Except Britain stands by those words, even today.

>
>4. Bush, finally admitted that he put that statement back in,
>even though he'd been warned not to use it!

It was back in due to the British intelligence organization insisting
that the statement was dead-on accurate.

>
>In anyone's "book" that's lying!!! Of course, the media
>let the matter drop and never bothered to call Bush on it.


You mean you wish he was lying, therefore he must be lying. Not to
worry... your illness is called "liberal-speak". You are not alone
with your affliction.

Mike Smith