Waiving the right to remain silent, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net> said:

> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>> And try to understand the difference between "the blogosphere" which is
>> generally served via HTTP protocol on port 80, and UseNet which operated
>> on NNTP on port 119. One is a web-based application with generally a
>> single source, and UseNet is distributed and mostly as part of the
>
> I realized you're pretty impressed with what you know about the
> internet. But really dude - most of us here in this newsgroup
> are techies - and we know all this basic crap.
>
> You used the terms "Usenet" and "blogosphere" interchangeably.
> For this community - that's just dumb.

No, he didn't.

--
Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

"I've come here to enjoy nature. Don't talk to me
about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane'

 
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:ZOaph.13558$ZT3.135@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> paul wrote:
>
>> you are a racist liar and a coward. your opinion doesn't count. people of
>> all political opinions despise you. you are ridiculed by children on
>> their way to school. you are as useful to society as a 200 pound lump of
>> rancid fat.
>>
>> no one cares what you think.
>
>
> What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of our beloved
> Guest Workers?

all that means to you is cheap labor, and hence cheap products for you to
consume. you don't give a whistlers damn about the workers themselves, let
alone the ones who die in the desert trying to get here.

>
> Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration will win
> converts to your cause?

dude, you lost this one when you, a known racist, had to resort to race
baiting to keep your argument alive. you are just a loser of the first
stripe. if you come up with an argument that you think deserves a respectful
airing, then you need to find someone with some degree of respect to present
it. the fact that YOU are saying it means it holds no water.

there is no changing the subject with a lying racist coward. that fact is
the only one that counts. nothing else YOU say has any validity... BECAUSE
you, a racist, were the one to say it. now back under your rock with you!

 
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:4Qaph.13559$ZT3.6152@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> paul wrote:
>
>>
>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect now
>> that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i must
>> say, i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least
>> unreasonable.
>
>
> It's funny how fools like you call for MORE and BIGGER government and then
> call yourself conservative.

it never happened. you are full of shit.

>
> It's no wonder you can't win any converts to your anti-mexican cause.

YOU are the one with a racist cause, you worthless piece of human flesh!

 
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:uQaph.13560$ZT3.13388@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> paul wrote:
>
>> you sanders are nobodies fool. don't worry though, maybe you will be
>> adopted. try coming up with a new insult. this one is old and worn out.
>
>
> What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of our beloved
> Guest Workers?
>
> Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration will win
> converts to your cause?

couldn't think of anything original to say, so you just repeated yourself
over and over. this one has been answered. go look it up, loser.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168458331.493543.205570@77g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> > tommie softman lied:
>>
>> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>>
>> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who
>> was
>> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.
>
> Thanks for your non-response.

what, should i have called you a name back? you lost this argument, and the
discussion ended when you could only reply with hate and vitriol, instead of
reasoned argument. T Jr Hardman ate your lunch, and you drooled on yourself
in response. i merely recorded the fact for history.

>
> Please learn how to use the shift key.

i whisper so that i won't scare you off. if you don't like it, don't read
it.

> The first letter of the first
> word of every sentence should be upper case.

yes, rudy, i went to school too. like i said, if you don't like it, don't
click on it.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168458822.812636.14890@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> > tommie softman lied:

> So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
> obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.
>

you are clearly more stupid than i had you figured for. PHD? in what? i
would have to see that to believe it. when you refer to someone whos name is
T Jr Hardman as "softman", that is an example of name calling. around here,
the technical name for it is "bullshit name calling".

you lost.

now back under your rock with you!

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1168458331.493543.205570@77g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> > paul wrote:
> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >> > tommie softman lied:
> >>
> >> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
> >>
> >> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who
> >> was
> >> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.
> >
> > Thanks for your non-response.
>
> what, should i have called you a name back?

You shouldn't have written anything, certainly not the pack of lies
about namecalling that you did write.


> you lost this argument,

Nope.

You lied. You accused me of namecalling, and your accusation is a lie.


> > Please learn how to use the shift key.
>
> i whisper so that i won't scare you off.

You couldn't scare a mouse.


> > The first letter of the first
> > word of every sentence should be upper case.
>
> yes, rudy, i went to school too.

A complete waste of the taxpayers' money.

paul lied:
> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1168458822.812636.14890@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > paul wrote:
> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >> > tommie softman lied:
>
> > So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
> > obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.
> >
>
> you are clearly more stupid than i had you figured for.

You really didn't read it.


> PHD? in what?

Economics. I said that already, stupid.


> i would have to see that to believe it.

Suit yourself. Means nothing to me if a lying semi-literate usenet
troll believes it or not.


> when you refer to someone whos name is
> T Jr Hardman as "softman", that is an example of name calling.

No.

Here's an example of namecalling: you're a fucking stupid shitbag.

> you lost.

Nope. You didn't read the post. You can't talk about the topic.
You're just a snarky, semi-literate little Corporal NetKopp.

Fuck off, shitbag.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168470717.787046.92940@i56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1168458331.493543.205570@77g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>> > paul wrote:
>> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> >> > tommie softman lied:
>> >>
>> >> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>> >>
>> >> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person
>> >> who
>> >> was
>> >> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your non-response.
>>
>> what, should i have called you a name back?
>
> You shouldn't have written anything, certainly not the pack of lies
> about namecalling that you did write.
>
>
>> you lost this argument,
>
> Nope.
>
> You lied. You accused me of namecalling, and your accusation is a lie.

lol, you didn't even snip it all out from this post (only some refference to
it). look at the top. when you refer to someone named Hardman as "softman"
that is name calling. it would be like me calling you "rudy toody canoozler"
or some other such. name calling. you lose, you are just too stupid or
arrogant to admit it.

>
>
>> > Please learn how to use the shift key.
>>
>> i whisper so that i won't scare you off.
>
> You couldn't scare a mouse.

i don't try.

>
>
>> > The first letter of the first
>> > word of every sentence should be upper case.
>>
>> yes, rudy, i went to school too.
>
> A complete waste of the taxpayers' money.
>

lol, kind of like your OWN education? name calling is name calling. you can
deny it, but it won't make it go away.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168470893.481281.22730@p59g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> paul lied:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1168458822.812636.14890@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> > paul wrote:
>> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> >> > tommie softman lied:
>>
>> > So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
>> > obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.
>> >
>>
>> you are clearly more stupid than i had you figured for.
>
> You really didn't read it.
>
>
>> PHD? in what?
>
> Economics. I said that already, stupid.
>
>
>> i would have to see that to believe it.
>
> Suit yourself. Means nothing to me if a lying semi-literate usenet
> troll believes it or not.
>
>
>> when you refer to someone whos name is
>> T Jr Hardman as "softman", that is an example of name calling.
>
> No.
>
> Here's an example of namecalling: you're a fucking stupid shitbag.
>
>> you lost.
>
> Nope. You didn't read the post. You can't talk about the topic.
> You're just a snarky, semi-literate little Corporal NetKopp.
>
> Fuck off, shitbag.
>

lol, i should just let it go and not respond, but it is so much fun watching
you lose it over and over on command.

you really are a disapointment. i thought maybe i would have some
intelligent debate on a very important subject, but you are just a loser
name calling arrogant baby with a big temper, and nothing else going for
you.

lol, bye!

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1168470717.787046.92940@i56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > paul wrote:
> >> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1168458331.493543.205570@77g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> >> > paul wrote:
> >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >> >> > tommie softman lied:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
> >> >>
> >> >> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who
> >> >> was above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your non-response.
> >>
> >> what, should i have called you a name back?
> >
> > You shouldn't have written anything, certainly not the pack of lies
> > about namecalling that you did write.
> >
> >
> >> you lost this argument,
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > You lied. You accused me of namecalling, and your accusation is a lie.
>
> lol, you didn't even snip it all out from this post (only some refference to
> it). look at the top. when you refer to someone named Hardman as "softman"
> that is name calling.

Nope.


> it would be like me calling

It's not namecalling. You lied.

Learn to use capital letters, shitbag.



> >> > Please learn how to use the shift key.
> >>
> >> i whisper so that i won't scare you off.
> >
> > You couldn't scare a mouse.
>
> i don't try.

Good - it would be another in a long string of failure.



> >> > The first letter of the first
> >> > word of every sentence should be upper case.
> >>
> >> yes, rudy, i went to school too.
> >
> > A complete waste of the taxpayers' money.
> >
>
> lol, kind of like your OWN education? name calling is name calling.

I didn't call softman any names. You lied about that.

Meanwhile, shitbag, you're wasting time complaining about style,
undoubtedly because you lack any substance.

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1168470893.481281.22730@p59g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> > paul lied:
> >> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1168458822.812636.14890@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >> > paul wrote:
> >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >> >> > tommie softman lied:
> >>
> >> > So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
> >> > obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.
> >> >
> >>
> >> you are clearly more stupid than i had you figured for.
> >
> > You really didn't read it.
> >
> >
> >> PHD? in what?
> >
> > Economics. I said that already, stupid.
> >
> >
> >> i would have to see that to believe it.
> >
> > Suit yourself. Means nothing to me if a lying semi-literate usenet
> > troll believes it or not.
> >
> >
> >> when you refer to someone whos name is
> >> T Jr Hardman as "softman", that is an example of name calling.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Here's an example of namecalling: you're a fucking stupid shitbag.
> >
> >> you lost.
> >
> > Nope. You didn't read the post. You can't talk about the topic.
> > You're just a snarky, semi-literate little Corporal NetKopp.
> >
> > Fuck off, shitbag.
> >
>
> lol, i should just let it go and not respond, but

But you can't help yourself; no self control whatever. I count on
that, paulie.


> you really are a disapointment.

Would you like me to send you a quarter, so you can call someone who
gives a rat's ass?

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> samovar wrote:
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
>>> news:SIGoh.40849$FX1.26315@fe05.news.easynews.com...
>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can stick this "border closed" bullshit right back up your
>>>>> coalchute.
>>>> Fuck off and DIE REAL SOON Rudy/Hendrie, you exterminable piece of
>>>> SHIT!
>>>
>>> Not exterminable, laughable:
>>>
>>> http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455
>>>
>>>
>>> FBFR
>>>
>> Dude, you are so fucking trolled:
>>
>> http://www.laweekly.com/general/features/radio-provocateur/1615/
>>
>> For anyone who doesn’t know who Phil Hendrie is or quite grasp what he
>> does — and it’s staggering exactly how many people still don’t — he is
>> the eponymous host of radio’s The Phil Hendrie Show, now syndicated to
>> nearly 100 stations nationwide, and airing locally on KFI AM 640.
>
> And you, you clueless fat fuck, don't seem to realize he's been OFF THE
> FUCKING AIR

Referring to yourself in the 3rd person is not a healthy sign Phil -
SEEK HELP...

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> You impotent Nazi queer.

You unemployed old hack has been.

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> tommie softman lied:
>
>> Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>
> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who was
> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong. you are
> no better than sam on this count, today. T Jr Hardman did not start the name
> calling. you did. in my book, this makes you the loser. whoever has to
> resort to unreasoned hateful name calling first is the one who cannot back
> up their arguments with reason and logic. you need to get a grip. if you
> believe that your opinions have merit, then present them without being the
> first to spew vitriol.
>
> having said all this, thank you for demonstrating the strength of the secure
> border argument with your bullshit response.
>
> paul

Paul you really need to quit mother-henning this group:

> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/nanny.htm

samovar wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> samovar wrote:
>>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>>> "samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
>>>> news:SIGoh.40849$FX1.26315@fe05.news.easynews.com...
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can stick this "border closed" bullshit right back up your
>>>>>> coalchute.
>>>>> Fuck off and DIE REAL SOON Rudy/Hendrie, you exterminable piece of
>>>>> SHIT!
>>>>
>>>> Not exterminable, laughable:
>>>>
>>>> http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FBFR
>>>>
>>> Dude, you are so fucking trolled:
>>>
>>> http://www.laweekly.com/general/features/radio-provocateur/1615/
>>>
>>> For anyone who doesn’t know who Phil Hendrie is or quite grasp what
>>> he does — and it’s staggering exactly how many people still don’t —
>>> he is the eponymous host of radio’s The Phil Hendrie Show, now
>>> syndicated to nearly 100 stations nationwide, and airing locally on
>>> KFI AM 640.
>>
>> And you, you clueless fat fuck, don't seem to realize he's been OFF
>> THE FUCKING AIR since June
>
> Referring to me as a clueless fat fuck is accurate

Right, you clueless fat fuck - that's why I did it.

samovar wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> You impotent Nazi queer.
>
> You unemployed

Nope.

You stupid, impotent Nazi queer.

paul wrote:
> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message

> > What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of our beloved
> > Guest Workers?
>
> all that means to you is cheap labor, and hence cheap products for you to
> consume. you don't give a whistlers damn about the workers themselves, let

You're the one taking a stand against the workers.
Remember?

T Jr Hardman wrote:
> paul wrote:
>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he
>>>>>>>> took it
>>>>>>>> down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so
>>>>>>>> fast. It
>>>>>>>> was great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other - especially
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> matters of character.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>> sam.
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> two deserve each other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>> file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he would
>>>>> not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>> winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would be
>>>>> because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>> post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>
>>>> i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with
>>>> you on
>>>> things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and
>>>> dignity. you
>>>> have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who defends
>>>> himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of being
>>>> racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>
>>>> paul
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>> myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>> yourself?
>>
>>
>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution
>> and the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights
>> that it conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i
>> also believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as
>> is sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in
>> reducing the anger component between various factions of the political
>> spectrum.
>
> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?

No such thing, your link to a bullshit site
notwithstanding.


> http://www.radicalcenter.org/

Yeah, they show their true rightwing colors soon enough:

Most Americans are really rather conservative in
their core values. They want to perpetuate their way
of life. They want a strong nation with a robust
economy. They want to have savings accounts that
grow and pay interest. They want careers that will
pay them decently for their hard work. They want
good educations for their children. They want their
Constitution honored by the government.

Actually, all of those apply to virtually all
Americans, but the last one - constitutional governance
- does *not* apply to the sort of bigoted suburban
conservative these fraudsters are trying to reach.

paul wrote:
> "T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
> news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
>> paul wrote:
>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he took
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so fast.
>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>> was great.
>>>>>>>> It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other - especially
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>> matters of character.
>>>>>>> "character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>>> sam.
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> two deserve each other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>>> file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he would
>>>>>> not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>>> winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would be
>>>>>> because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>> post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>> i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with you
>>>>> on
>>>>> things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and dignity.
>>>>> you
>>>>> have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who defends
>>>>> himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of being
>>>>> racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>>
>>>>> paul
>>>>>
>>>> I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>> myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>> yourself?
>>>
>>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution and
>>> the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights that it
>>> conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i also
>>> believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as is
>>> sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in reducing
>>> the anger component between various factions of the political spectrum.
>> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>>
>> http://www.radicalcenter.org/
>
> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate.

A bullshit term, totally contradictory.


> i suspect now
> that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues.

You were always a rightwing bootlick

T Jr Hardman wrote:
> paul wrote:
>> "T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
>> news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
>>
>>> paul wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he
>>>>>>>>>> took it
>>>>>>>>>> down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so
>>>>>>>>>> fast. It
>>>>>>>>>> was great.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other -
>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> matters of character.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight
>>>>>>>> with sam.
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> two deserve each other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>>>> file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>>>> winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That
>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>> because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>>> post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed
>>>>>> with you on
>>>>>> things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and
>>>>>> dignity. you
>>>>>> have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who
>>>>>> defends
>>>>>> himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>>> myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>>> yourself?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little
>>>> more complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the
>>>> constitution and the limits on government that it provides, as well
>>>> as the rights that it conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most
>>>> of my beliefs. i also believe that most of those who disagree with
>>>> me are not evil, as is sometimes portrayed by a few extreme
>>>> conservatives. i believe in reducing the anger component between
>>>> various factions of the political spectrum.
>>>
>>> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>>>
>>> http://www.radicalcenter.org/
>>
>>
>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect
>> now that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i
>> must say, i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the
>> least unreasonable.
>>
>> i will check out your site when i get a chance and give you a more
>> difinitive answer.
>
> Thanks.
>
> You may discover that I can hold extremely strong opinion, especially as
> regards national security and border defense.

Like the good little storm trooper you always wanted to be.


> However, while those
> opinions may be strong I believe that I can defend them ably and
> articulate them in a rational manner which should sway reasonable people
> toward my own positions.

But not sway them enough to vote for you.

paul wrote:
> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
> news:4Qaph.13559$ZT3.6152@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
>> paul wrote:
>>
>>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect now
>>> that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i must
>>> say, i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least
>>> unreasonable.
>>
>> It's funny how fools like you call for MORE and BIGGER government and then
>> call yourself conservative.
>
> it never happened. you are full of shit.

Tut, tut - and you pretend to object to my
(non-existent) "namecalling".

Anyway, it *did* happen. It happened when you voted
for Bush.


>> It's no wonder you can't win any converts to your anti-mexican cause.
>
> YOU are the one with a racist cause, you worthless piece of human flesh!

Namecalling? Just wondering.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:8Wkph.8709$pQ3.6831@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> paul wrote:
>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>> news:4Qaph.13559$ZT3.6152@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
>>> paul wrote:
>>>
>>>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect
>>>> now that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i
>>>> must say, i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the
>>>> least unreasonable.
>>>
>>> It's funny how fools like you call for MORE and BIGGER government and
>>> then call yourself conservative.
>>
>> it never happened. you are full of shit.
>
> Tut, tut - and you pretend to object to my (non-existent) "namecalling".
>
> Anyway, it *did* happen. It happened when you voted for Bush.
>
>
>>> It's no wonder you can't win any converts to your anti-mexican cause.
>>
>> YOU are the one with a racist cause, you worthless piece of human flesh!
>
> Namecalling? Just wondering.

You're a ______________.

Fill in the blank above with your choice of one of the following words:
troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll...

FBFR

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:fUkph.8708$pQ3.6967@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>> paul wrote:
>>> "T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
>>> news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
>>>
>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he
>>>>>>>>>>> took it
>>>>>>>>>>> down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so
>>>>>>>>>>> fast. It
>>>>>>>>>>> was great.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other -
>>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>> matters of character.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>>>>> sam.
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> two deserve each other.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my
>>>>>>>> kill
>>>>>>>> file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a
>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>> winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>>>> post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to
>>>>>>>> say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with
>>>>>>> you on
>>>>>>> things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and
>>>>>>> dignity. you
>>>>>>> have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who
>>>>>>> defends
>>>>>>> himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> paul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>>>> myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>>>> yourself?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>>>>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution
>>>>> and the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights
>>>>> that it conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i
>>>>> also believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as
>>>>> is sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in
>>>>> reducing the anger component between various factions of the political
>>>>> spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.radicalcenter.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect
>>> now that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i
>>> must say, i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least
>>> unreasonable.
>>>
>>> i will check out your site when i get a chance and give you a more
>>> difinitive answer.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> You may discover that I can hold extremely strong opinion, especially as
>> regards national security and border defense.
>
> Like the good little storm trooper you always wanted to be.
>
>
>> However, while those opinions may be strong I believe that I can defend
>> them ably and articulate them in a rational manner which should sway
>> reasonable people toward my own positions.
>
> But not sway them enough to vote for you.

You're a ______________.

Fill in the blank above with your choice of one of the following words:
troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll...

FBFR

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:iTkph.8707$pQ3.2553@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> paul wrote:
>> "T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
>> news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
>>> paul wrote:
>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he
>>>>>>>>>> took it
>>>>>>>>>> down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so
>>>>>>>>>> fast. It
>>>>>>>>>> was great.
>>>>>>>>> It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other -
>>>>>>>>> especially
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> matters of character.
>>>>>>>> "character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>>>> sam.
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> two deserve each other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>>>> file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>>>> winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>>> post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>>> i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with
>>>>>> you on
>>>>>> things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and
>>>>>> dignity. you
>>>>>> have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who
>>>>>> defends
>>>>>> himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> paul
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>>> myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>>> yourself?
>>>>
>>>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>>>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution
>>>> and the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights
>>>> that it conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i
>>>> also believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as
>>>> is sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in
>>>> reducing the anger component between various factions of the political
>>>> spectrum.
>>> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>>>
>>> http://www.radicalcenter.org/
>>
>> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate.
>
> A bullshit term, totally contradictory.
>
>
>> i suspect now that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few
>> issues.
>
> You were always a rightwing bootlick

You're a ______________.

Fill in the blank above with your choice of one of the following words:
troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll, troll...

FBFR