"Rudy Canoza" <notgenxagain@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168306709.031569.17970@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Jafo wrote:
>> As viewed from alt.california, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>
>> >We don't have birthright citizenship as a matter of policy, we have
>> >it as a matter of fact. No administration or Congress ever set out
>> >to create birthright citizenship as we know it.
>>
>> "As we know it". That's true. The intent of that part of the 14th
>> Amendment was to ensure that citizenship could not be denied to former
>> slaves or their offspring.
>>
>> I don't think we need to worry about that liklihood any more.
>
> Right. I addressed this already, although not in the original post:
>
> We need to do away with birthright citizenship, period.
> The part of the 14th amendment dealing with freed
> slaves is obsolete. Every living freed slave is dead, and
> all their descendants are now citizens by virtue of being
> the children of citizens. It's no longer needed.
>
> Wikipedia has a decent discussion of birthright citizenship, or /jus
> soli/, at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States_of_America
> Among other things, I'm reminded by looking at it of the name of the
> recent Supreme Court decision in or about which Justice Scalia
> suggested the judicial climate is ripe for a repeal of the doctrine of
> /jus soli/: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.
>

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenxagain@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168308566.543182.51770@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> > T Jr Hardman wrote:
>> >
>> >>Jafo wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>As viewed from alt.california, gringogirl wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY RUDY THIS IS JUST 1/100 OF THE FOUL MOUTH
>> >>>>HATE CRIMES YOU HAVE POSTED -
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> <remaining petulant bullshit cheerfully shitcanned>
>> >>>
>> >>>Nothing to say about the actual topic of the thread, eh?
>> >>
>> >>Jafo, you will doubtless recall my "Amexica Improvement Corporation"
>> >>posting from Sept 6 2001?
>> >>
>> >>I agree that we need to do away with the birthright citizenship in
>> >>cases
>> >>where the parents aren't here legally.
>> >
>> >
>> > We need to do away with birthright citizenship, period. The part of
>> > the 14th amendment dealing with freed slaves is obsolete. Every living
>> > freed slave is dead, and all their descendants are now citizens by
>> > virtue of being the children of citizens. It's no longer needed.
>> >
>> > It's worth noting that anyone who gained citizenship under the
>> > birthright citizenship laws in effect at the time will not lose their
>> > citizenship. A change in the law would only apply to the future.
>>
>> That's why we need a Supreme Court decision before any such law is
>> passed. Otherwise it would violate the "no ex post facto" clause in the
>> Constitution.
>
> Any law passed by Congress would explicitly state that anyone who
> gained citizenship under the old rules would not have it revoked.
> That's as it should be. The SC would probably wish to avoid making any
> ruling at all precisely because if they overturned Wong Kim Ark and the
> subsequent decisions, it would turn millions of citizens into
> non-citizens overnight. Of course, Congress could remedy that by
> granting all of them permanent resident alien status.
>
>
>> However, such a decision by SCOTUS could pave the way to
>> retroactive stripping of citizenship of the children of illegal aliens.
>
> Congress could handle that easily.
>

 
"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:pff8q2tevvfa23bu2tprsiij52kle4qlk2@4ax.com...
> As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman made a fool of himself
> by writing:
>
>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>And try to understand the difference between "the blogosphere"
>>>which is generally served via HTTP protocol on port 80, and
>>>UseNet which operated on NNTP on port 119. One is a web-based
>>>application with generally a single source, and UseNet is
>>>distributed and mostly as part of the
>
>>I realized you're pretty impressed with what you know about the
>>internet. But really dude - most of us here in this newsgroup
>>are techies - and we know all this basic crap.
>>
>>You used the terms "Usenet" and "blogosphere" interchangeably.
>
> ROTFLMAO! Once again: No, he didn't.
>
> *Read* his fuckin' words, asshole.
>
> --
> Jafo

 
"paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote in message
news:MwFoh.38315$lD5.4109@newsfe14.phx...
>
> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
> news:BgFoh.14475$yC5.3590@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> paul wrote:
>>
>>> doesn't matter. if you are unwilling to close and secure the borders
>>> first, then there will be no further discussion. that is just the way it
>>> is.
>>
>> And yet - the discussion marches on.
>
> talk is talk. walk is walk. they are NOT the same thing. feel free to
> discuss this amongst yourselves. i am not willing to discuss amnesty or
> expanding the guest worker program and related bonuses for lawbreakers
> until i know that it will result in a secure border. fool me once...
>
> paul
>

 
"paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote in message
news:MZMoh.8123$kM1.5870@newsfe11.phx...
>
> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
> news:fhIoh.15107$sR.3773@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>> paul wrote:
>>
>>> costs of such technologies have been dropping rapidly. technology will
>>> make higher risk immaterial. we also need to put corporate big whigs in
>>> jail for hiring illegal workers. this act alone will dramatically reduce
>>> the huge numbers of border crossers.
>>
>> You keep doing this.
>> You try soooo hard to say you're not just another bigot.
>> But then you slip up like this, and reveal your *true* agenda.
>
> and you can refer to an accomplished woman as a "house nigger" and think
> you are not a racist.
>
>
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with crossing the border.
>> We *welcome* border crossers.
>> They do wonderful things for us, and we reward them for it.
>>
>
>

 
"samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
news:f6Hoh.25912$In2.6552@fe10.news.easynews.com...
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> samovar wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> [re-edited to solve some line break problems]
>>>>
>>>> Set up a program that legalizes it.
>>>
>>> One does not jump to legalize crimes regardless of their ubiquity.
>>
>> Legalize the flow of labor across the border.
>
> Seal the border, reinstitute the Bracero program.
>
>>>> 1. Repeal birthright citizenship. It never was the intent
>>>> of any law or amendment.
>>>
>>> Are you balmy?
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States_of_America
>>>
>>> Throughout the history of the United States, the fundamental legal
>>> principle governing citizenship has been that birth within the
>>> territorial limits of the United States confers United States
>>> citizenship.[1]
>>
>> I read it before you did. It's false.
>
> Content free denial - you LOSE again!
>
> Write back when you can accurately admit and address the LAW.
>
>>>
>>> Birthright citizenship has its roots in English common law.
>>
>> Stuff it.
>
> Drop dead troll.
>
>>>> 2. Make a realistic estimate of the total number of people
>>>> who would come to the US from Mexico and Central America
>>>> under a guest worker program that allowed stays of up to
>>>> 10 years. Add 25% to that, and that's the quota. By making
>>>> it generous, you eliminate the sort of bottleneck that creates
>>>> the pressure to jump the border illegally.
>>>
>>> Nope, 25% is an absurdly high fudge factor,
>>
>> Nope. It's fine.
>
> No, it's a joke.
>
>>>> 3. The federal government has to tax citizens in states with
>>>> few or no guest workers in order to offset the fiscal
>>>> burden of those states where they're concentrated.
>>>> The unfair fiscal burden of immigrant-heavy states is THE ONLY
>>>> authentic problem from illegal immigration, and it is the
>>>> responsibility of the federal government to redress it.
>>>
>>> Incorrect, the government is not chartered
>>
>> The federal government already redistributes money among the states.
>
> They have no mandate to tacitly endorse illegal immigration.
>
> Their mandate is to secure the border - period.
>
>>>> 4. Entrants must present proof of citizenship in Mexico or
>>>> a Central American country...or Canada. No one from
>>>> South America or any other part of the world is eligible
>>>> (but illegal immigration from other parts of the world
>>>> is negligible anyway.)
>>>
>>> Another lie,
>>
>> How can a proposal be a lie?
>
> Simple, your lie is stating that illegal entry form other nations is
> "negligible" as proven - and then snipped, you verminous liar.
>
>>>> 5. At the end of their 10-year stay, they must return to their
>>>> native countries for one year; then they're eligible
>>>> to return for another 10 years.
>>>
>>> Says who?
>>
>> Not who; what. My excellent proposal says it, that's what.
>
> You are a low-wattage moron, your cobbled together left wing bullshit
> collapses the minute you squat to release it.
>
>>>> 6. If they wish to immigrate permanently, they must return to
>>>> their native countries and apply through the normal process.
>>>> Assuming good behavior during their guest worker stays,
>>>> their past residence in the US under the guest worker
>>>> program will count favorably for them in their permanent
>>>> immigration application.
>>>
>>> Finally one ray of sanity - here you make a reasonable condition for
>>> citizenship.
>>>
>>>> 7. While resident in the US, they are entitled to every
>>>> Constitutional protection afforded to citizens, especially
>>>> due process. Upon conviction of a misdemeanor, their
>>>> visit is ended and they must return to their native country
>>>> for a year. Upon conviction of a felony, they are deported and
>>>> become permanently ineligible for readmission.
>>>
>>> Oh...just a year is it?
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> It's as if they finished their authorized 10-year visit.
>
> It's as if you were somehow told you had a brain....
>
> THEY LIED!
>
>>> As to the felony aspect, that already is law.
>>
>> I didn't say all of my proposal is new.
>
> You never even had the intellectual honesty to admit that what you
> "ptoposed" already EXISTED!
>
> You are a liar rudy, a lying whore.
>
>>>> This will work.
>>>
>>> From what pro-illegal immigration website did you cobble that together
>>> Rudy?
>>
>> None.
>
> Bullshit - you lying moron.

 
"samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
news:B4Poh.46837$9Q1.22566@fe04.news.easynews.com...
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>>> Bullshit
>>
>> Nope. It's original.
>
> If true even a sadder display of your rank stupidity.

 
"paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote in message
news:cXMoh.8122$kM1.7891@newsfe11.phx...
>
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:ggHoh.12327$X72.12176@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> samovar wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> samovar wrote:
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenxagain@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1168314537.842373.119000@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:eVvoh.7857$pQ3.6538@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>>>>>> [re-edited to solve some line break problems]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Set up a program that legalizes it.
>>>>>>>>> any of these things can be discussed, but not while the border is
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> open.
>>>>>>>> Baloney. That's an absurd pre-condition.
>>>>>>> then we have nothing to talk about. i've been burned on this issue
>>>>>>> before,
>>>>>>> and it will not happen again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're setting absurd preconditions like that, then you have
>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>> to talk about with anyone - you have thoroughly marginalized yourself
>>>>>> right out of the discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> You were so right out of the box, crawl into a corner and DIE you
>>>>> motherfucker!
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you try to *make* me die,
>>>
>>> Oh what a joy that would be too!
>>>
>>> Don't tempt me....
>>
>> I'm telling you right now to put up or shut up, queer.
>
> sammy is an echo from the woods. because of his hate and vitriol, he
> really doesn't count.
>
> paul
>

 
"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:fhr5q25cc3pg177gbfbuaeaqtsekb8mjh2@4ax.com...
> Continuing to think simplistically, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>I agree that we need to do away with the birthright citizenship
>>>in cases where the parents aren't here legally.
>
>>Now if only you could find a Hitler to champion your cause.
>
> Most countries don't have birthright citizenship.
> Are they therefore all Nazis?
>
> --
> Jafo

Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> grandwazoo wrote:
>
>> Some of us not techies. There are quite a few professions represented
>> here. I think as to general subject matter, it gives a broader
>> dimension of perspective and experience. Although, sometimes I wonder
>> how some of the folks on the low end of the intelligence bell curve
>> ever manage to post at all.
>
> Techies or old-timers, I guess.
> Indeed, I've been dealing with a whole pack of teenage grrls lately.
> They're all very tech-savvy, and especially as it relates to net
> communing. But not a one of em knows what Usenet is.
>
> OT - how'd you find out this "place" existed?

Left alone with my new computer in about 1996. The term 'news' was
different than what the name would suggest. I eventually found my way to
the az groups. I have to thank the alt.fans.art bell Usenet bullies,
alt.fan Frank Zappa (one of the earliest groups) and the science.skeptic
group, great fun.

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>
>
>> My patience with
>>you is almost exhausted as it is almost exhausted with almost all
>>Americans. You are more the enemy
>
>
>
> Please leave our Nation then. I mean it, get the fuck out now If you
> hate Americans so fucking much. Please get the fuck out and stay the
> fuck out. This, I guarantee, if you EVER run for office again - the
> voters will know EXACTLY the disdain you show for them. They have
> already shown you their disdain. You sicken me, you anti-american scum.

You appear to have no comprehension of English complex grammar.

As with almost all Americans, my patience with you is almost exhausted.

Feel better now?

I love my country and my fellow citizens, unless of course they're vile
supporters of the illegal invasion of my homeland.

And to reiterate, You are more the enemy than possibly could be some
poor hick bastard driven out of the farming business back home in Mexico
by NAFTA and US agricultural subsidies. I don't blame them, I blame you.



--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>HipCrime's Newsagent[1] software is a free and open source Usenet
>>>>control client. The program is written in Java and allows the user to
>>>>auto-cancel any messages on Usenet based on author, subject,
>>>>organization, message-iD, or path. It also allows the user to replace
>>>>the body of any message with text of their choosing. The software also
>>>>monitors any posts you choose and reposts them if they are removed[2].
>>>>Additionally, it allows regular users to act as Usenet Administrators
>>>>and create (or remove) entire newsgroups.
>>>
>>>
>>>Actually, it only *claims* to do that.
>>
>>It lived up to its claims quite well enough to force massive revisions
>>of policy at all major and most minor ISPs providing NNTP server facilities.
>>
>>
>>>One of your fellow White
>>>Supremists
>>
>>I am not a white supremacist, you frothing little piece of brain-damaged
>>filth.
>
>
> Oh, so you just give them financial support?

Not at all.

> Why don't you come out
> of the closet? In all ways on Usenet you attack folks that believe in
> justice

You do not believe in Justice, you believe in something inexplicable and
twisted. You'd rather spend weeks arguing for criminals and against the
law-abiding.

> and support rabid anti-american racist creeps. You told me


I told you WHAT? I never told you any such thing, freak.

> you
> were so afraid of my postings you were going to give even more money to
> the KKK inspired, MInutemen. You support racists. But you, you know
> Mexicans. You even have friends, huh?
>
> You sicken me, pig.

Now you're hallucinating.


--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Dude wrote:
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>
>>> HipCrime's Newsagent[1] software is a free and open source Usenet
>>> control client. The program is written in Java and allows the user to
>>> auto-cancel any messages on Usenet based on author, subject,
>>> organization, message-iD, or path. It also allows the user to replace
>>> the body of any message with text of their choosing. The software
>>> also monitors any posts you choose and reposts them if they are
>>> removed[2]. Additionally, it allows regular users to act as Usenet
>>> Administrators and create (or remove) entire newsgroups.
>>
>>
>> Actually, it only *claims* to do that. One of your fellow White
>> Supremists tried to use it against my posts and, as you can plainly
>> see, it didn't work. Instead of canceling my posts, his ISP canceled
>> his account.
>>
>> You really need to stop buying into marketing slogans. Especially the
>> ones from Open Sores developers. It's just puffery.
>
>
> You dream on, Jew baiter.

He's way beyond the stage of dementia.

http://www.dansdata.com/sporge.htm



--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>
>
>>I was making that suggestion because
>>otherwise he might die. Sorry I made the suggestion; I hope he does.
>>
>>Die, I mean.
>
>
>
> You are so burdened with hate. Have you tried prayer? Really, You are
> going are a very troubled and sick person. Please find some help. God
> would show you love, if you can to him with a humble heart. Just a
> thought. I will pray for you, it's clear you are hurting.

Fuck off. Quit supporting the Invasion and I'll stop hating you. Hating
this nation's enemies is not merely my right but my duty.



--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jafo wrote:
>
>> Poor Sanders really has nothing to say. Offer facts and he'll assign
>> his own bizarre meanings to them. And if he realizes that he can't
>> do that without making a fool of himself, then he'll just snip your
>> quotes.
>
>
> What does that have to do with your hatred and fear of our guest workers?
>
> Do you really think such misbehavior wins any converts to your
> sociopathic cause?

You're profiteering from trafficking in human cargo.

Die, wretch.


--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>You wouldn't know the difference between a spider and a centipede if
>>>>they were attached to your scrotum and easily viewed as you once again
>>>>prepared to put your head up your ass.
>>>
>>>
>>>It's the even-tempered rational way of speaking that really wins me over
>>>to you border-bigots.
>>
>>It's your implacable stupidity that makes people gape in wonderment,
>>asking themselves, "can anyone actually be that much of an asshole".
>>
>>It's true. You can be, in fact as all can see, you are.
>
>
>
> Hardman can't seem to get along with anyone.

I am proud to say that I cannot get along with people who openly support
criminals.


> If you disagree with him,
> you must be stupid. If you don't see that THE SKY IS FALLING - WE ARE
> BEING INVADED - to him, you must be crazy. Problem is 85% of the
> American people think he's nuts. Oh well. To Hardman it's the rest of
> the world that's nuts and him and his racist friends are the sane ones.
> Sad.

Criminal.



--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

 
T Jr Hardman wrote:

> I love my country and my fellow citizens, unless of course


You disagree with them. And they you stomp your little feet and scream
that they are an enemy of the state and they support invasion. And when
you do that, Americans look at you like a fool and feel nothing but
pity for your sad ignorance. Stomp your feet some more ---->

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>
>>I love my country and my fellow citizens, unless of course
>
>
>
> You disagree with them. And they you stomp your little feet and scream
> that they are an enemy of the state and they support invasion. And when
> you do that, Americans look at you like a fool and feel nothing but
> pity for your sad ignorance.

Most Americans -- some 80 percent of them -- oppose illegal immigration
and want the laws enforced and the borders and ports secured.

I agree with that majority of Americans.

Any who wish to disagree are free to disagree.

Any who aid and abet illegal aliens, or who employ them, should be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

My feelings are so strong on this matter than I refuse to work for
people who employ illegal aliens; I don't want to be working for Federal
felons as they actively engage in their criminal acts. I've kept my
record clean so that I have the moral high ground. One presumes from
their opposition to illegal immigration, so have the majority of Americans.

Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
abet, the Invasion.




--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

 
T Jr Hardman wrote:

> Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
> abet, the Invasion.

You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.

you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.

I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.

As viewed from alt.california, Tim Crowley wrote:

>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>>You wouldn't know the difference between a spider and a centipede
>>>>if they were attached to your scrotum and easily viewed as you
>>>>once again prepared to put your head up your ass.

>>> t's the even-tempered rational way of speaking that really wins
>>>me over to you border-bigots.

>>It's your implacable stupidity that makes people gape in
>>wonderment, asking themselves, "can anyone actually be that much of
>>an asshole".
>>
>>It's true. You can be, in fact as all can see, you are.

>Hardman can't seem to get along with anyone. If you disagree with
>him, you must be stupid. If you don't see that THE SKY IS FALLING -
>WE ARE BEING INVADED - to him, you must be crazy. Problem is 85% of
>the American people think he's nuts. Oh well. To Hardman it's the
>rest of the world that's nuts and him and his racist friends are the
>sane ones. Sad.

What's sad is that people like you, Kaufman and "Fooled By Folksy
Republicans", who don't share a set of balls between you, have to
fall back on the race card immediately because you can't make a case
for your position.

Now go ahead, guys... prove me right yet again.

<push>
<jump!>
--
Jafo

As viewed from alt.california, Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:

>"Jafo" wrote...
>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>Jafo wrote:
>>>>gringogirl wrote:
>>>>>YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY RUDY THIS IS JUST 1/100 OF THE FOUL MOUTH
>>>>>HATE CRIMES YOU HAVE POSTED -

>>>> <remaining petulant bullshit cheerfully shitcanned>

>>>>Nothing to say about the actual topic of the thread, eh?

>>>Jafo, you will doubtless recall my "Amexica Improvement Corporation"
>>>posting from Sept 6 2001?
>>
>> No, I don't believe I do.

>>>I agree that we need to do away with the birthright citizenship in cases
>>>where the parents aren't here legally.

>> Absolutely. Most countries don't even *have* "birthright citizenship".

I notice that in most of your "posts", you merely quote the previous
statements without daring to offer comments of your own. It must be
pretty tough, just standing there with warm urine trickling down your
trembling legs as you silently read the words of your betters.

--
Jafo

As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>Jafo wrote:
>>Poor Sanders really has nothing to say. Offer facts and he'll assign
>>his own bizarre meanings to them. And if he realizes that he can't
>>do that without making a fool of himself, then he'll just snip your
>>quotes.

>What does that have to do with your hatred and fear of our guest
>workers?
>
>Do you really think such misbehavior wins any converts to your
>sociopathic cause?

Well, thanks for proving my point, Sanders. BTW, I don't suppose that
you'd have any cites to support your accusation?

No, I didn't think so.

Next.

--
Jafo

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>
>>Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
>>abet, the Invasion.
>
>
> You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
>
> you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
>
> I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.

Prove I lie.

Or STFU.


--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

As viewed from alt.california, Tim Crowley wrote:

>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
>>abet, the Invasion.

>You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
>
>you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
>
>I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.

And you figure that falling back on this sort of half-assed attack
frees you from having to back up your assertions and accusations?

Not likely, Timmy. There's just not much future for cowardly snipers
like you.

--
Jafo

 
T Jr Hardman wrote:
> Tim Crowley wrote:
> > T Jr Hardman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
> >>abet, the Invasion.
> >
> >
> > You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
> >
> > you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
> >
> > I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.
>
> Prove I lie.

You already have.


>
> Or STFU.

scum like you will never shut me up.
I will continue to speak the truth and you will continue to fail in all
you do. Get used to it. hint: you're lying scum and that's how you
will always be treted.