"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:KqZoh.13496$ZT3.11062@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> paul wrote:
>
>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution and
>> the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights that it
>> conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i also
>> believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as is
>> sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in reducing
>> the anger component between various factions of the political spectrum.
>
> Of course you want to reduce the anger component. Six or seven years of
> Americans putting up with y'alls hate-based, faithless faith has justly
> earned you a great deal of anger.
>
> You hated the American people and our system of government so much that
> you took a stand against those who would defend us from Bush and the
> NeoChristians.
>
> Well boi, think of it like rape. There's nothing you can do about it, so
> you might as well just kick back and enjoy it.

you are a racist liar and a coward. your opinion doesn't count. people of
all political opinions despise you. you are ridiculed by children on their
way to school. you are as useful to society as a 200 pound lump of rancid
fat.

no one cares what you think.

paul

 
"T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>> news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>
>>>On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he took
>>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>>down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so fast.
>>>>>>>>It
>>>>>>>>was great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other - especially
>>>>>>>over
>>>>>>>matters of character.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>>sam.
>>>>>>you
>>>>>>two deserve each other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>>file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he would
>>>>>not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>>winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would be
>>>>>because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>
>>>>i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with you
>>>>on
>>>>things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and dignity.
>>>>you
>>>>have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who defends
>>>>himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of being
>>>>racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>
>>>>paul
>>>>
>>>
>>>I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>yourself?
>>
>>
>> the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>> complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution and
>> the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights that it
>> conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i also
>> believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as is
>> sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in reducing
>> the anger component between various factions of the political spectrum.
>
> Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>
> http://www.radicalcenter.org/

20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect now
that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i must say,
i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least unreasonable.

i will check out your site when i get a chance and give you a more
difinitive answer.

paul
>
>
> --
> http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
> A true Conservative isn't about to let
> the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.
>

 
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:xrZoh.13497$ZT3.751@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> paul wrote:
>
>> i really get a kick out of it when an outright racist like you accuses
>> someone ELSE of being a bigot. you are the lowest form of life, bucky.
>> pure scum of the earth racist bigot asshole liar and coward. you seem to
>> hit the bottom in every notably low and disgusting catagory. as always.
>
> It's the even-tempered rationality of you border-bigots that wins you
> soooo much support.
>

you sanders are nobodies fool. don't worry though, maybe you will be
adopted. try coming up with a new insult. this one is old and worn out.

paul wrote:
> "T Jr Hardman" <blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote in message
> news:45A46503.3090104@thomashardman.com...
>
>>paul wrote:
>>
>>>"Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>news:2kl8q2p1hm4ndukdk8c6g96k5gpa8lt777@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Graphic Queen" <pagan@pagan.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:kvc8q29u0sjfpube58k9bjbuki5ab9nnbi@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:27 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:jXUoh.14578$yC5.10356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Graphic Queen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Like the blog that Tom DeLay started? That was so funny how he took
>>>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>>>down and deleted all of the comments that were against him so fast.
>>>>>>>>>It
>>>>>>>>>was great.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's funny to see you right-wingers trashing each other - especially
>>>>>>>>over
>>>>>>>>matters of character.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"character" = a subject that you have no clue about. go fight with
>>>>>>>sam.
>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>two deserve each other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sanders is replying to me? How funny since the asswipe is in my kill
>>>>>>file.You are right though. Character is definitely something he would
>>>>>>not understand at all, not to mention the fact that I am not a right
>>>>>>winger but he calls anyone who disagrees with him that. That would be
>>>>>>because he can't and won't think for himself and only knows what to
>>>>>>post by reading or hearing what the liberal leaders tell him to say.
>>>>>
>>>>>i can attest that you are not a right winger. i have disagreed with you
>>>>>on
>>>>>things in the past. it has always had a degree of civility and dignity.
>>>>>you
>>>>>have a good read on bucky though. he's a racist little pig who defends
>>>>>himself by accusing those who caught him with his racist rant of being
>>>>>racists themselves. in my mind that is the definition of cowardice.
>>>>>
>>>>>paul
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I am not a right winger but I am also not a liberal. I would call
>>>>myself a Constitutionalist. How about you? hat do you consider
>>>>yourself?
>>>
>>>
>>>the easy answer would be that i am a conservative. it's a little more
>>>complex than that though. i am a strong believer in the constitution and
>>>the limits on government that it provides, as well as the rights that it
>>>conveys. i am also fairly libertarian in most of my beliefs. i also
>>>believe that most of those who disagree with me are not evil, as is
>>>sometimes portrayed by a few extreme conservatives. i believe in reducing
>>>the anger component between various factions of the political spectrum.
>>
>>Could you consider yourself to be Radical Middle or Radical Center?
>>
>>http://www.radicalcenter.org/
>
>
> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect now
> that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i must say,
> i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least unreasonable.
>
> i will check out your site when i get a chance and give you a more
> difinitive answer.

Thanks.

You may discover that I can hold extremely strong opinion, especially as
regards national security and border defense. However, while those
opinions may be strong I believe that I can defend them ably and
articulate them in a rational manner which should sway reasonable people
toward my own positions.

There's a spectrum between "open borders" and "shoot anyone trying to
cross". I'm somewhere in the middle, but much farther from the "open
borders" position than from the other side.


--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

Tim Crowley wrote:
> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>
>>Tim Crowley wrote:
>>
>>>T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
>>>>abet, the Invasion.
>>>
>>>
>>>You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
>>>
>>>you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
>>>
>>>I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.
>>
>>Prove I lie.
>
>
> You already have.

Where, exactly? And about what, exactly?

If you're going to make accusations, try to be prepared to back them up.

>>Or STFU.
>
>
> scum like you will never shut me up.

Don't you know enough to quit when it's evident to most everyone that
you're just plain wrong?

> I will continue to speak the truth and you will continue to fail in all
> you do. Get used to it. hint: you're lying scum and that's how you
> will always be treted.

Prove I'm lying. References, quotes, cites?


--
http://thomashardman.com/ Centrist, Moderate, Republican in Maryland
A true Conservative isn't about to let
the enemies of America ruin his streams for Trout.

tommie softman lied:
> Tim Crowley wrote:
>> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Crowley wrote:
>>>
>>>> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
>>>>> abet, the Invasion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
>>>>
>>>> you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
>>>>
>>>> I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.
>>>
>>> Prove I lie.
>>
>>
>> You already have.
>
> Where, exactly? And about what, exactly?

Among other things, softman, in your characterization
of the movement of undocumented immigrants across the
border as an "invasion". It is not.

Also, in your less than forthright pretensions as to
what the real problems are that result from illegal
immigration. None of what you pretend are problems
really are problems that justify the hyperbolic
responses you give to them, including the
mischaracterization of the flow of people as an "invasion".

Also, in your flimsy grasp of economics and your sham
concern about the "cost" of the undocumented immigrants.

The list of your implicit lies could go on at some
length, I believe.

As viewed from alt.california, paul wrote:

>you sanders are nobodies fool. don't worry though, maybe you will be
>adopted.

:-)

--
Jafo

As viewed from alt.california, Tim Crowley wrote:

>I will continue to speak the truth

No, you'll continue to make up your "facts" and claim them to be
true. But how many times can you run away when asked to support
those alleged "facts" before enough people see you for the lightweight
you are?

--
Jafo

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> tommie softman lied:

> Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>

rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who was
above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong. you are
no better than sam on this count, today. T Jr Hardman did not start the name
calling. you did. in my book, this makes you the loser. whoever has to
resort to unreasoned hateful name calling first is the one who cannot back
up their arguments with reason and logic. you need to get a grip. if you
believe that your opinions have merit, then present them without being the
first to spew vitriol.

having said all this, thank you for demonstrating the strength of the secure
border argument with your bullshit response.

paul

T Jr Hardman wrote:

> I love my country and my fellow citizens, unless of course they're vile
> supporters of the illegal invasion of my homeland.
>
> And to reiterate, You are more the enemy than possibly could be some
> poor hick bastard driven out of the farming business back home in Mexico
> by NAFTA and US agricultural subsidies. I don't blame them, I blame you.

That's why we don't give you any of the handouts you keep
calling for.

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0700, "paul" <riever@cox.net> wrote:

>
>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> tommie softman lied:
>
>> Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>
>rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who was
>above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong. you are
>no better than sam on this count, today. T Jr Hardman did not start the name
>calling. you did. in my book, this makes you the loser. whoever has to
>resort to unreasoned hateful name calling first is the one who cannot back
>up their arguments with reason and logic. you need to get a grip. if you
>believe that your opinions have merit, then present them without being the
>first to spew vitriol.
>
>having said all this, thank you for demonstrating the strength of the secure
>border argument with your bullshit response.
>
>paul
>

But, but, but, Paul, Rudy has a Ph.D. from UCLA.

DCI

Jafo wrote:
> As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>>> Poor Sanders really has nothing to say. Offer facts and he'll assign
>>> his own bizarre meanings to them. And if he realizes that he can't
>>> do that without making a fool of himself, then he'll just snip your
>>> quotes.
>
>> What does that have to do with your hatred and fear of our guest
>> workers?
>>
>> Do you really think such misbehavior wins any converts to your
>> sociopathic cause?
>
> Well, thanks for proving my point, Sanders. BTW, I don't suppose that
> you'd have any cites to support your accusation?

What accusation?
What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
our guest workers?

Jafo wrote:

> What's sad is that people like you, Kaufman and "Fooled By Folksy
> Republicans", who don't share a set of balls between you, have to
> fall back on the race card immediately because you can't make a case
> for your position.


What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
our beloved Guest Workers?

Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration
will win converts to your cause?

paul wrote:

> you are a racist liar and a coward. your opinion doesn't count. people of
> all political opinions despise you. you are ridiculed by children on their
> way to school. you are as useful to society as a 200 pound lump of rancid
> fat.
>
> no one cares what you think.


What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
our beloved Guest Workers?

Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration
will win converts to your cause?

paul wrote:

>
> 20 years ago i used to brag about being a radical moderate. i suspect now
> that i am a bit more conservitive than that now on a few issues. i must say,
> i have found nothing that you have posted that is in the least unreasonable.


It's funny how fools like you call for MORE and BIGGER
government and then call yourself conservative.

It's no wonder you can't win any converts to your anti-mexican
cause.

paul wrote:

> you sanders are nobodies fool. don't worry though, maybe you will be
> adopted. try coming up with a new insult. this one is old and worn out.


What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
our beloved Guest Workers?

Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration
will win converts to your cause?

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d%%oh.9123$yx6.931@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> samovar wrote:
>> Fooled By Folksy Republicans wrote:
>>> "samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
>>> news:SIGoh.40849$FX1.26315@fe05.news.easynews.com...
>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can stick this "border closed" bullshit right back up your
>>>>> coalchute.
>>>> Fuck off and DIE REAL SOON Rudy/Hendrie, you exterminable piece of
>>>> SHIT!
>>>
>>> Not exterminable, laughable:
>>>
>>> http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43447455
>>>
>>> FBFR
>>>
>> Dude, you are so fucking trolled:
>>
>> http://www.laweekly.com/general/features/radio-provocateur/1615/
>>
>> For anyone who doesn’t know who Phil Hendrie is or quite grasp what he
>> does — and it’s staggering exactly how many people still don’t — he is
>> the eponymous host of radio’s The Phil Hendrie Show, now syndicated to
>> nearly 100 stations nationwide, and airing locally on KFI AM 640.
>
> And you, you clueless fat fuck, don't seem to realize he's been OFF THE
> FUCKING AIR since June.
>
> You stupid, insensate douche.

Not only is he stupid, he is not a listener as he did not realize that prior
to ending his program to go into film, Hendrie was on KLAC in LA for about a
year or so... he has not been on KFI for the longest time.

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > tommie softman lied:
>
> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>
> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who was
> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.

Thanks for your non-response.

Please learn how to use the shift key. The first letter of the first
word of every sentence should be upper case.

paul wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > tommie softman lied:
>
> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>
> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who was
> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong. you are
> no better than sam on this count, today. T Jr Hardman did not start the name
> calling. you did.

What name(s) did I call him in the post that you plainly didn't read?
I said that his characterization of the flow of people across the
border as an "invasion" is wrong, and it *is* wrong. Because softman
knows it's wrong, it's a deliberate falsehood for him to call it that.

I said as well that what he has called the "problems" resulting from
the flow of immigrants are not problems that justify his hyperbolic
speech on the issue.

So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> tommie softman lied:
>> Tim Crowley wrote:
>>> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tim Crowley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> T Jr Hardman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Clearly you are in the minority here, because you support, aid, and
>>>>>> abet, the Invasion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are nothing but a filthy, blatant lying scumbag.
>>>>>
>>>>> you're human garbage and you can expect to be treated that way.
>>>>>
>>>>> I blame your parents. They never taught you it was wrong to lie. Sad.
>>>>
>>>> Prove I lie.
>>>
>>>
>>> You already have.
>>
>> Where, exactly? And about what, exactly?
>
> Among other things, softman, in your characterization of the movement of
> undocumented immigrants across the border as an "invasion". It is not.

There's only an invasion of nitwit Usenet trolls, like you. Wanna fight?

>
> Also, in your less than forthright pretensions as to what the real
> problems are that result from illegal immigration. None of what you
> pretend are problems really are problems that justify the hyperbolic
> responses you give to them, including the mischaracterization of the flow
> of people as an "invasion".

For the first time, this troll actually makes sense...now watch the schizoid
troll come back to say the opposite.

>
> Also, in your flimsy grasp of economics and your sham concern about the
> "cost" of the undocumented immigrants.

Well, both of you have a flimsy grasp of economics, but otherwise you've
surprised me with an iota of common sense, trollvege. Now, in keeping with
proper trolling technique, say the opposite thing then add some foul
language in the space provided below:




>
> The list of your implicit lies could go on at some length, I believe.

Unlike certain parts of your anatomy, one might very well say that that
applies to the two of you.

Fooled By Folksy Republicans

As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>Jafo wrote:
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>>Jafo wrote:
>>>>Poor Sanders really has nothing to say. Offer facts and he'll assign
>>>>his own bizarre meanings to them. And if he realizes that he can't
>>>>do that without making a fool of himself, then he'll just snip your
>>>>quotes.

>>>What does that have to do with your hatred and fear of our guest
>>>workers?
>>>
>>>Do you really think such misbehavior wins any converts to your
>>>sociopathic cause?

>>Well, thanks for proving my point, Sanders. BTW, I don't suppose that
>>you'd have any cites to support your accusation?

>What accusation?

The one that you're about to repeat...

>What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
>our guest workers?

Yeah, that's the one; the accusation that I'm supposed to have some
sort of "fear and hatred" of anyone.

--
Jafo

As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>Jafo wrote:
>>What's sad is that people like you, Kaufman and "Fooled By Folksy
>>Republicans", who don't share a set of balls between you, have to
>>fall back on the race card immediately because you can't make a case
>>for your position.

>What does any of that have to do with your fear and hatred of
>our beloved Guest Workers?
>
>Do you really think changing the subject away from immigration
>will win converts to your cause?

Sanders, you need to be a good deal more intelligent to try to pull
off subject changes like this. Y'know, I followed your exchange with
Hardman about TV viewing on the PC with considerable amusement, and
likewise your recent screwing up of his explanation of Usenet, so the
bullshit you're engaging in right now really doesn't surprise me very
much. You're practically illiterate, so you have to insert your own
meaning into the words of others in order to have something to whine
about. The only thing you find "beloved" about your "guest workers"
is that they make it possible for you to sit on your fat ass in front
of the keyboard all day and still have a fresh-cut lawn.

--
Jafo

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168458822.812636.14890@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> > tommie softman lied:
>>
>> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>>
>> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who
>> was
>> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong. you
>> are
>> no better than sam on this count, today. T Jr Hardman did not start the
>> name
>> calling. you did.
>
> What name(s) did I call him in the post that you plainly didn't read?
> I said that his characterization of the flow of people across the
> border as an "invasion" is wrong, and it *is* wrong. Because softman
> knows it's wrong, it's a deliberate falsehood for him to call it that.

Good trolling technique here--are you listening, Spammy? Watch as Canoozo
pretends to be engaged in a rational debate only to slip in mild abuse and
accusations....now observe the ensuing primitive troll-primate behavior as
Caneeza moves to escalate toward full-fledged abuse.

Jane Goodall was the first to document the behavior of the Canooza-ape in
the wild, but you the viewer can, for the first time ever, catch it right
here!


>
> I said as well that what he has called the "problems" resulting from
> the flow of immigrants are not problems that justify his hyperbolic
> speech on the issue.

I found the speech to be parabolic--2x squared and all..ran it in Maple.

>
> So, where's the name calling? You snipped all that - didn't read it,
> obviously - and responded to your own fabricated version of my post.
>

Unparalleled duplicity! Well done! Accuse the target 'Paul' of what
Canooza does himself...great work!

And, the Troll of the Year Award goes to.....

Spammy!

Sorry, Canooza, you earned it, but you don't have the Halliburton political
connections that Spammy does.

Congrats, Spamuel...bribery will get you everywhere! Foley's 'Pugs might
even make you make you a page someday.

FBFR

 
"Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168458331.493543.205570@77g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> paul wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:J6aph.9441$w91.2989@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> > tommie softman lied:
>>
>> > Among other things, softman, ... <bullshit snipped>
>>
>> rudy, i really thought for a minute that you were a reasoned person who
>> was
>> above petty gratuitous name calling. it turns out that i was wrong.
>
> Thanks for your non-response.

What makes you think you deserve a rational response, trollvege?

>
> Please learn how to use the shift key. The first letter of the first
> word of every sentence should be upper case.

Thank you, Miss Netiquette, but if your advice is needed we'll ask for it.

FBFR

>

 
"Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
news:vv%oh.12622$X72.10338@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> samovar wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> paul wrote:
>>>> "samovar" <bala@laik.a> wrote in message
>>>> news:1gPoh.47186$9Q1.5040@fe04.news.easynews.com...
>>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ggHoh.12327$X72.12176@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>>> samovar wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>> samovar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <notgenxagain@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1168314537.842373.119000@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paul wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eVvoh.7857$pQ3.6538@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [re-edited to solve some line break problems]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Set up a program that legalizes it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of these things can be discussed, but not while the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baloney. That's an absurd pre-condition.
>>>>>>>>>>>> then we have nothing to talk about. i've been burned on this
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue before,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and it will not happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>> If you're setting absurd preconditions like that, then you have
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> to talk about with anyone - you have thoroughly marginalized
>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>> right out of the discussion.
>>>>>>>>>> You were so right out of the box, crawl into a corner and DIE you
>>>>>>>>>> motherfucker!
>>>>>>>>> Why don't you try to *make* me die,
>>>>>>>> Oh what a joy that would be too!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't tempt me....
>>>>>>> I'm telling you right now to put up or shut up, queer.
>>>>>> sammy is an echo from the woods. because of his hate and vitriol, he
>>>>>> really doesn't count.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> paul
>>>>> Oh paul, can't we all just get along?
>>>>
>>>> i really don't think so.
>>>
>>> No, there's really no point in trying to get along with a pure troll
>>> like spamovar. I enjoy a bit of usenet shit-slinging as well as anyone,
>>> but that's all spamovar does. It's all *any* extremist shitbag, but
>>> especially the rightwing extremist shitbags, does. "Fooled by Folksy
>>> Republicans" is an example of the same thing at the opposite extreme.
>>
>> Rudy you assbag, FBFR is a hard-line Marxist wonk.
>
> I didn't need you to tell me that, you Nazi douchebag. I've been trying to
> cram some free-market sense down his trotskyite throat with a gavotte for
> a couple of weeks.
>
> And YOU are a Nazi.
>
>
>>
>> Sheesh, as conservatives go I'm pro stem-cell, some illegal amnesty, and
>> full speed alternate energy. Hard a starboard I ain't.
>
> Yes, you are - just as far to the Jew-gassing right as that cunthair is to
> the Pol Pot killing-fields left.
>
> You're not a conservative, shitbag. You're a frenzied reactionary
> foam-at-lips Nazi.

In the interests of peace, let me settle this feud between lovers amicably:
you're both Jew-gassing Nazis!

FBFR