Bjorn <was-walmart-greeter@postamerica.net> used a stick in the sand
to babble
>
>It is indeed the aim that matters. And your aim is quite obviously
>toward what is a liberal reality. I Hate (give that a capital 'H'), I
>Hate the smarmy, racist, self-loathing, anti-americanism of liberals.
>"Moderate" It is quite often the pose of scoundrels who have not the
>character to stand behind what they are really about, they want
>unearned credibility via the pretention of being something else.
>Moderate, in today's America, is another word for Unprincipled.
>Moderation is not what's needed, there is little at this time we want
>to preserve through political moderation.

*shakes head sadly*

I still don't understand how rightists can accept that there are
leftists and vice versa, but neither can accept that there can be
centrists. This is especially true since it's the center, not left or
right, which does the electing.

Swill

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:okmtp3h5a0slmuih4pgrn92vo25abkvnfs@4ax.com...
> "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> used a stick in the sand to
> babble
>>> Nothing wrong with that. It would certainly increase the supply of
>>> cash for investment.
>>We could become energy independent by riding horses to work too.
> Actually, that would cost more. Horses are more expensive to keep
> than cars.
>>> Clinton wants to exempt simple savings account
>>> interest from taxation much like tax exempt retirement funds. Too bad
>>> she'll have to pay for that by hiking cap gains taxes.
>>Sounds like an excuse to hike cap gains taxes.
> No reason to increase them. Just tax them at the same rate as regular
> wages.

An increase is an increase.

We already have very high consumer credit debt and we've recently seen late
and missed payments increase. What savings? There's very little cash in
people's savings accounts so there's no federal revenue potential there.

On Jan 23, 6:28=A0pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote ---
> > So WHO are you going to vote for, PG? =A0Hm.
> > McCain - favors immigration reform, "moderate" of the GOP candidates,
> > even though he wants to keep American troops in Iraq for another 100
> > years.
> -
> I'm NOT voting for McAmnesty. =A0Period. =A0No exceptions. =A0That ain't
> happenning.

Oh, poor, pitiful PG, McCain won the all-or-nothing GOP primary in
your home state of Florida. He gets all of your state's party
delegates!

It must suck badly to be rejected by your fellow Republicans.

> > And your vote, Patriot Games, goes to...???
> -
> If McAmnesty is the GOP candidate I'm voting for YOU. =A0I'm going to writ=
e
> your name in!

Get ready to write the name "Tom Swift Sr." come November 2008 on your
voting ballot, PG.

> You will then be IMMORTALIZED.

Already am.

> 500 years from now some historian will be looking over the actual official=

> voting register and see a write-in for "Tom Sr." and say "Who the fuck is
> that?"

That's okay. A lot of my personal papers are already stored at Brown
University in Rhode Island; they can read about me there.

I'm saving your original post to remind you coming election day later
this year, Patriot Games. You can be SURE I am NOT going to let you
forget THIS promise!

-Tom Sr.

 
"Tom Sr." <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af7be261-ef45-49de-8d23-69a053713160@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 23, 6:28 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote ---
> > So WHO are you going to vote for, PG? Hm.
> > McCain - favors immigration reform, "moderate" of the GOP candidates,
> > even though he wants to keep American troops in Iraq for another 100
> > years.
> -
> I'm NOT voting for McAmnesty. Period. No exceptions. That ain't
> happenning.

Oh, poor, pitiful PG, McCain won the all-or-nothing GOP primary in
your home state of Florida. He gets all of your state's party
delegates!

It must suck badly to be rejected by your fellow Republicans.

> > And your vote, Patriot Games, goes to...???
> -
> If McAmnesty is the GOP candidate I'm voting for YOU. I'm going to write
> your name in!

Get ready to write the name "Tom Swift Sr." come November 2008 on your
voting ballot, PG.

> You will then be IMMORTALIZED.

Already am.

> 500 years from now some historian will be looking over the actual official
> voting register and see a write-in for "Tom Sr." and say "Who the fuck is
> that?"

That's okay. A lot of my personal papers are already stored at Brown
University in Rhode Island; they can read about me there.

I'm saving your original post to remind you coming election day later
this year, Patriot Games. You can be SURE I am NOT going to let you
forget THIS promise!

-Tom Sr.

-----------------------------------------------

PG is in my killfile -- I can read Newsmax without his dumbass headlines.

But -- ol' PG must be gasping for breath -- McCain is running ahead; PG's
favorite Freddie Dalton Thompson was this year's Edsel; Rudy never had a
chance; Huckabee will be the next to go; and, Democrats are outpolling
Republicans by huge majorities.

On Jan 30, 7:23=A0am, "Joe S." <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> I'm saving your original post to remind you coming election day later
> this year, Patriot Games. =A0You can be SURE I am NOT going to let you
> forget THIS promise!
> =A0-Tom Sr.
> -----------------------------------------------
> -
> PG is in my killfile -- I can read Newsmax without his dumbass headlines.

Alas, Google Groups does not have killfiles.

However, I was honored, when after 12+ months of PG's posts to me
going to alt.stupidity, he finally learned to use a killfile and I was
the very! first! person he killfiled!

> But -- ol' PG must be gasping for breath -- McCain is running ahead; PG's
> favorite Freddie Dalton Thompson was this year's Edsel; Rudy never had a
> chance; Huckabee will be the next to go; and, Democrats are outpolling
> Republicans by huge majorities.

Oh, I am sure PG is still in some totally delusional state right now,
thinking Thompson will be McCain's VP choice or some other psychotic
belief like that -- and McCain can die in office so Freddy will be
Prez.

PG will still be like that the day after a Democratic is sworn in as
President in January 2009. At the point, he'll likely start talking
about his guns.

-Tom Sr.

"Tom Sr." <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:00a9dff7-392e-4a7a-9ee7-11b72c8dfa4a@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 30, 7:23 am, "Joe S." <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>However, I was honored, when after 12+ months of PG's posts to me
>going to alt.stupidity, he finally learned to use a killfile and I was
>the very! first! person he killfiled!

A clarification. Exactly ONE post to you went to alt-stupidity. You didn't
see any of them because there weren't any because you were kill-filed.

I recently unKill-Filed my list to see what's going on...

"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
news:47a09a76$0$29957$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> "Tom Sr." <tomswiftsr@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:00a9dff7-392e-4a7a-9ee7-11b72c8dfa4a@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 30, 7:23 am, "Joe S." <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>>However, I was honored, when after 12+ months of PG's posts to me
>>going to alt.stupidity, he finally learned to use a killfile and I was
>>the very! first! person he killfiled!
>
> A clarification. Exactly ONE post to you went to alt-stupidity. You
> didn't see any of them because there weren't any because you were
> kill-filed.
>
> I recently unKill-Filed my list to see what's going on...

Why bother shit listing him in the first place?

Jebus H. Christmas you are one dumb fucker.

"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> used a stick in the sand to
babble
>> No reason to increase them. Just tax them at the same rate as regular
>> wages.
>
>An increase is an increase.
>
>We already have very high consumer credit debt and we've recently seen late
>and missed payments increase. What savings? There's very little cash in
>people's savings accounts so there's no federal revenue potential there.

That's as lame a response as you've ever posted. People with
significant and regular cap gains income aren't cash short like a
working family with only regular income.

Why not charge the same rate for cap gains as for wages? Isn't that a
fair tax? Doesn't that simplify the tax code and make taxation
flatter? Even better, it increases revenues while ending tax
discrimination.

Swill

On Jan 30, 8:51 pm, "Nebuchadnezzar II" <nebuchadnez...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote in message
> news:47a09a76$0$29957$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> > "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote --
> >>However, I was honored, when after 12+ months of PG's posts to me
> >>going to alt.stupidity, he finally learned to use a killfile and I was
> >>the very! first! person he killfiled!
> -
> > A clarification. Exactly ONE post to you went to alt-stupidity. You
> > didn't see any of them because there weren't any because you were
> > kill-filed.

You lie, Patriot Games.

86 posts to alt.stupidity under your original Google Groups account:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=patriot+games+bomb+iraq+now&num=30&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2007&as_maxd=2&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off&

10 posts to alt.stupidity under your current Google Groups account:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=30&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=alt.stupidity&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=patriot@america.com+&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=31&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2008&safe=off

ALSO:
26 posts to alt.usenet.kooks under your original Google Groups
account:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=30&q=group%3Aalt.usenet.kooks&safe=off&enc_author=EliQPhcAAADU2Bi3GNSvjPkXz4--xXQMatZc1V3Nc280dLHqonrV6A

1 post to alt.usenet.kooks under your current Google Groups account:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=30&q=group%3Aalt.usenet.kooks+author%3Apatriot@america.com&safe=off

10 posts to alt.test under your current Google Groups account:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=patriot+games+bomb+iraq+now&num=30&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2007&as_maxd=2&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off&

* TOTAL: 133 posts *

> > I recently unKill-Filed my list to see what's going on...

And, once again, I am humiliating you when I bother to reply to your
posts, PG, this time, now, by proving once again you are a liar.

> Why bother shit listing him in the first place?
> Jebus H. Christmas you are one dumb fucker.

Because when PG started posting much more regularly in late 2006, I
was usually there to show what a bigot and a fool he was in my
posts.

Just as I showed what a liar he is in *this* post, I constantly showed
how stupid and delusional he was over and over again. Meanwhile, his
replies to me were disappearing into the Usenet newsgroup wasteland,
showing he didn't even understand *Usenet*.

PG has since taken to posting lies about my personal life, twisting,
distorting, and creating falsehoods about myself and events in my
life.

Of course, the sane readers of and posters to Usenet know far better
than to believe anything he has to say, especially when it comes to
personal attacks. His entire world-view is delusional, built on a
politics of Neo-Nazism, which he himself fails to recognize. And
after all, this is a supposedly "heterosexual" man who is obsessed
with male homosexuals and man-to-man sex as can be seen is so very
many of his posts.

But, the truth is simple, I think. Like most things in his Life, from
people of different races, to gay people, to progressives, to other
cultures and religions, Patriot Games is AFRAID. His bitter and vile
and seemingly endlessly hate shows his irrational and psychotic fear
of others and himself as well.

I was the first person Patriot Games killfiled because he wasa nd
still is afraid of me.

He will, of course, deny this, lacking the self-awareness and the
courage to see his own fears.

-Tom Sr.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qf93q31r0qmohc99ekfm0qr2vao6s5j1c8@4ax.com...
> "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> used a stick in the sand to
> babble
>>> No reason to increase them. Just tax them at the same rate as regular
>>> wages.
>>An increase is an increase.
>>We already have very high consumer credit debt and we've recently seen
>>late
>>and missed payments increase. What savings? There's very little cash in
>>people's savings accounts so there's no federal revenue potential there.
> That's as lame a response as you've ever posted. People with
> significant and regular cap gains income aren't cash short like a
> working family with only regular income.

But there are MANY FEWER of them....

> Why not charge the same rate for cap gains as for wages? Isn't that a
> fair tax?

Actually that would be a Flat Tax. X% for ALL income, regarless of source.

I have NO problem with that.

> Doesn't that simplify the tax code and make taxation
> flatter? Even better, it increases revenues while ending tax
> discrimination.

That's the Flat Tax in a nutshell!

"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> used a stick in the sand to
babble
>> That's as lame a response as you've ever posted. People with
>> significant and regular cap gains income aren't cash short like a
>> working family with only regular income.
>
>But there are MANY FEWER of them....
>
>> Why not charge the same rate for cap gains as for wages? Isn't that a
>> fair tax?
>
>Actually that would be a Flat Tax. X% for ALL income, regarless of source.
>
>I have NO problem with that.
>
>> Doesn't that simplify the tax code and make taxation
>> flatter? Even better, it increases revenues while ending tax
>> discrimination.
>
>That's the Flat Tax in a nutshell!

Works for me. X%, off the top, no exemptions or deductions for
individuals or businesses.

Swill