So, what is new (or old)? What can you do about it? These people
were brought up in the jungles and such as have jungle mentality.


On 2=D4=C225=C8=D5, =C9=CF=CE=E76=CA=B106=B7=D6, "bjorn" <uz4n4k...@sneakem=
ail.com> wrote:
> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>
> 2007-02-24
>
> Racial differences in "average personality."
>
> by Richard Lynn
>
> For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
> societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
> pathology: crime, illegitimacy, poverty, school failure, and long-term
> unemployment. The conventional liberal explanation for this is white
> "racism," past and present, which has forced blacks into self-
> destructive choices. More clear-headed observers, however, have sought
> a partial explanation in the low average IQ of blacks.
>
> Low IQ can lead to crime because less intelligent children do poorly
> at school and fail to learn the skills needed to get well-paid jobs,
> or even any job. Unemployment is therefore two to three times higher
> among blacks than whites. People without jobs need money, and have
> relatively little to lose by robbery or burglary, and may therefore
> commit property crimes. The association between low intelligence and
> crime holds for whites as well, among whom the average IQ of criminals
> is about 84.
>
> Nevertheless, as Charles Murray and the late Richard Herrnstein showed
> in their book The Bell Curve, low IQ cannot entirely explain a black
> crime rate that is six-and-a-half times the white rate. When blacks
> and whites are matched for IQ, blacks still commit crimes at two-and-
> a-half times the white rate. This shows that blacks must have some
> other characteristic, besides low intelligence, that explains their
> high levels of criminality.
>
> Prof. Herrnstein and Dr. Murray found the same race and IQ
> relationship for social problems other than crime: unemployment,
> illegitimacy, poverty, and living on welfare. All of these are more
> frequent among blacks and are related to low IQ, and low IQ goes some
> way towards explaining them, but these social problems remain greater
> among blacks than among whites with the same IQs. Low intelligence is
> therefore not the whole explanation. Prof. Herrnstein and Dr. Murray
> did not offer any suggestions as to what the additional factors
> responsible for the greater prevalence of these social problems among
> blacks might be. They concluded only that "some ethnic differences are
> not washed away by controlling for either intelligence or for any
> other variables that we examined. We leave those remaining differences
> unexplained and look forward to learning from our colleagues where the
> explanations lie" (p. 340).
>
> Psychopathic Personality
>
> I propose that the variable that explains these differences is that
> blacks are more psychopathic than whites. Just as racial groups differ
> in average IQ, they can also differ in average levels of other
> psychological traits, and racial differences in the tendency towards
> psychopathic personality would explain virtually all the differences
> in black and white behavior left unexplained by differences in IQ.
>
> Psychopathic personality is a personality disorder of which the
> central feature is lack of a moral sense. The condition was first
> identified in the early nineteenth century by the British physician
> John Pritchard, who proposed the term "moral imbecility" for those
> deficient in moral sense but of normal intelligence. The term
> psychopathic personality was first used in 1915 by the German
> psychiatrist Emile Kraepelin and has been employed as a diagnostic
> label throughout the twentieth century. In 1941 the condition was
> described by Hervey Cleckley in what has become a classic book, The
> Mask of Sanity. He described the condition as general poverty of
> emotional feelings, lack of remorse or shame, superficial charm,
> pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of insight, absence of
> nervousness, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
> to learn from experience, reckless behavior under the influence of
> alcohol, and a lack of long-term goals.
>
> In 1984 the American Psychiatric Association dropped the term
> psychopathic personality and replaced it with "anti-social personality
> disorder." This is an expression of the increasing sentimentality of
> the second half of the twentieth century, in which terms that had
> acquired negative associations were replaced by euphemisms. There are
> other examples. Mentally retarded children are now called "slow
> learners" or even "exceptional children;" aggressive children now have
> "externalizing behaviors;" prostitutes are "sex workers;" tramps are
> now "the homeless," as if their houses were destroyed by earthquake;
> and people on welfare are "clients" of social workers. However, the
> term psychopathic personality remains useful.
>
> While psychopathic personality is a psychiatric disorder, it has long
> been regarded as the extreme expression of a personality trait that is
> continuously distributed throughout the population. In this respect it
> is like other psychiatric disorders. For instance, severe depression
> is a psychiatric disorder, but everyone feels depressed sometimes, and
> some normal people are depressed more often and more severely than
> others. It is the same with psychopathic personality. There are
> degrees of moral sense throughout the population, and psychopaths are
> the extreme group.
>
> There is a difference between blacks and whites--analogous to the
> difference in intelligence--in psychopathic personality considered as
> a
> personality trait. Both psychopathic personality and intelligence are
> bell curves with different means and distributions among blacks and
> whites. For intelligence, the mean and distribution are both lower
> among blacks. For psychopathic personality, the mean and distribution
> are higher among blacks. The effect of this is that there are more
> black psychopaths and more psychopathic behavior among blacks.
>
> Full articlehttp://www.amren.com/0207issue/0207issue.html#cover

bjorn wrote:
> Race and Psychopathic Personality


"Race' is a delusion which indicates your Psychopathic personality.



> 2007-02-24
>
> Racial differences in "average personality."

You can't measure 'racial differences' unless you can identify 'races'
and what we see here is the classic irrational racist belief that
'skin colour' (or eye colour, or hair colour) defines something called
'race'.. it doesn't;

"In the United States both scholars and the general public have
been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate
divisions within the human species based on visible physical
differences.

With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century,
however, it has become clear that human populations are not
unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups.

Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most
physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups
than between them. In neighbouring populations there is much
overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions.

Throughout history whenever different groups have come into
contact, they have interbred. "

- American Anthropological Association

>
> by Richard Lynn

Lynn's work is often misused by racists, as is the case with this
Article from the White Supremacist website 'American Renaissance'
which sports articles such as 'Raising White Children' B^p

The chief failure of racists is their failure to acknowledge
what Lynn attributes the variations in IQ to; Nutrition,
as in this example where a SINGLE ethnic group, Ashkenazi Jews
have a higher or lower IQ depending on the environment
in which they live;

"Lynn has previously argued at length that nutrition
is the best supported environmental explanation for
variation in the lower range,[10] and a number of other
environmental explanations have been advanced (see below).
Ashkenazi Jews average 107 in the U.S. and Britain, but
lower in Israel"

So, all the racists have to do is show how moving from a low
nutrition environment to a high nutrition environment alters your
'race'!? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!


> For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
> societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
> pathology:


The prime determinant of health is economic well being.

Centuries of slavery followed by social and economic deprivation
have discriminated against the very people the racists now want to
demonize further because of their disadvantage!

But the fundamental flaw in their analysis is the pretence that
'race' is defined by skin colour, where the pale skinned
Japanese and Scandinavians are the held to be the 'White race'.



> When blacks and whites are matched for IQ,

Black is a colour, not a 'race'

The idea that 'Whites' are a race has no scientific basis,
just look at the white people, Japanese and Scandinavians,
and tell us the scientific taxonomy that defines them
as the same 'race'...

The only sense in which they are is the universal truth,
all humans are descended from Africa, and they are part of ONE RACE,
the Human Race

As racists cannot define 'races' with any rational scientific
taxonomy we must ask, 'What is the reason for the persistence
of racism as a belief?" and the answer is simple, it has been
used to justify slavery, discrimination and oppression for centuries!

Racism is a cultural artefact used by low IQ, prejudiced bigots
for social control via discrimination.

The psychological profile of the racist is described below;


> Psychopathic personality is a personality disorder of which the
> central feature is lack of a moral sense.

key indicators include Slavery, Apartheid, the Ku Klux Klan,
Segregation, Lynchings, Nazi Eugenics, Cronulla riots, etc

> The condition was first
> identified in the early nineteenth century by the British physician
> John Pritchard, who proposed the term "moral imbecility" for those
> deficient in moral sense but of normal intelligence.

Pritchard's observations were based on the British subjects he
observed. (ie Europeans were the group in which moral imbeciles
were first identified and diagnosed)


> The term
> psychopathic personality was first used in 1915 by the German
> psychiatrist Emile Kraepelin and has been employed as a diagnostic
> label throughout the twentieth century.

Kraepelin's observations were similarly based on the White European
subjects he observed. (i.e. Europeans were the group in which
psychopathic personalities were first identified and diagnosed)

> In 1941 the condition was
> described by Hervey Cleckley in what has become a classic book, The
> Mask of Sanity. He described the condition as general poverty of
> emotional feelings, lack of remorse or shame, superficial charm,
> pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of insight, absence of
> nervousness, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
> to learn from experience, reckless behavior under the influence of
> alcohol, and a lack of long-term goals.

Again, Cleckly worked in the West, where case studies were abundant,
and to this day, we find numerous examples worthy of study;

bjorn - a Low IQ racist who thinks "White" is a race! B^D

Tex/Tropicus (a shizoid sociopath)

Infidel, Auntie-MoronCulture, Agora, Ned Latham, Nev Duguid,
all racists receiving psychiatric treatment for their illness.

>
> In 1984 the American Psychiatric Association dropped the term
> psychopathic personality and replaced it with "anti-social personality
> disorder." This is an expression of the increasing sentimentality of
> the second half of the twentieth century, in which terms that had
> acquired negative associations were replaced by euphemisms. There are
> other examples. Mentally retarded children are now called "slow
> learners" or even "exceptional children;" aggressive children now have
> "externalizing behaviors;" prostitutes are "sex workers;" tramps are
> now "the homeless," as if their houses were destroyed by earthquake;
> and people on welfare are "clients" of social workers. However, the
> term psychopathic personality remains useful.

Lynn makes a persuasive argument that just as White Europeans provided
most of the subjects in whom various psychiatric disorders were
identified, it also produced the plethora of theories in what became a
popular and influential, if largely ineffectual discipline (Psychiatry
is largely a Western phenomenon, with Europe and America providing most
of the disorders as well as the theories, practitioners and cultists)

The term pseudo-science has never been more useful than in
describing much of the modern replacement for priests and confession;
therapy and the Couch.

> While psychopathic personality is a psychiatric disorder, it has long
> been regarded as the extreme expression of a personality trait that is
> continuously distributed throughout the population.

None more so than among racists, immoral and irrational bigots
who have used pseudo science to justify eugenics and ethnic
cleansing.

> In this respect it
> is like other psychiatric disorders. For instance, severe depression
> is a psychiatric disorder, but everyone feels depressed sometimes, and
> some normal people are depressed more often and more severely than
> others. It is the same with psychopathic personality. There are
> degrees of moral sense throughout the population, and psychopaths are
> the extreme group.
>
> There is a difference between blacks and whites-

Wow, People who were herded onto slave ships, whipped, raped,
traduced, psychologically destroyed, oppressed, then told that
generations of environmental, including nutritional, deprivation
were not the cause of their under-performing, but that it was
something INNATE, due to their SKIN COLOUR, felt different to
white slaveowners?

About as different as poor whites, who also have poor educational and
health outcomes compared to their Rich white cousins.

In Australia, aboriginals were NOT ALLOWED To OWN LAND or OPEN
A BANK ACCOUNT, right up until living memory!

Special permission was given to Albert Namatjira, once he became
an internationally recognised artistic genius, to buy a house,
a car, and have a bank account.

Now we have racists trying to tell us the next generation of
aboriginals, raised in families who were LEGALLY prevented from
accessing the basis of entrepreneurial skills, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP,
are a bit slow in setting up businesses because their SKIN IS BLACK
rather than because, unlike the squattocracy and the bankers, they
don't have daddy to help you develop a share portfolio!?

FFS!

Take your RACIST shite and ram it up your fat white arse!






> For psychopathic personality, the mean and distribution
> are higher among blacks.

Just like it was higher among the poor and the convicts transported to
OZ. Poorly educated, poor nutrition, limited opportunities,
they turned to anti-social activities, stealing food.

Rich aristocrats are crazy behind the walled gardens of their stately
homes and clubs, they are 'eccentric' .. but poor crazies are crazy on
the streets, visible and without lawyers.

The single greatest outbreak of Psychopathic madness in the past century
occurred in 'civilized' white Europe, when the Nazis destroyed Europe
in an attempt to implement their insane, violent, racist genocide.


> The effect of this is that there are more
> black psychopaths and more psychopathic behavior among blacks.

Just as there is more heart disease and Glaucoma, among underclasses
no matter what their skin colour.

Every Aussie battler knows that their kids chance of going to uni,
and their LIFE EXPECTANCY, is lower than that of the upper class
kids whose parents buy opportunities.

Is there a poor 'race'? No, there is a poor class, and in some cases
it is most readily identified on the basis of an obvious difference,
such as Skin Colour, making it 10 times more likely the police will
pull them over than pull me over.

Expectations can become self-fulfilling.

> Full article
> http://www.amren.com/0207issue/0207issue.html#cover


Amren, the journal of White Racist Psychopaths

------------

"THE polls show John Howard is likely to be beaten
by Labor, now under its sharpest leader in a decade.
Facing defeat, the Prime Minister yesterday changed
not only his team but its tone." -Andrew Bolt 24/1/2007


Fraser accuses current PM of marginalising Muslims"

"I believe that this is divisive, dangerous and false."

"Mr Fraser said the Government was gearing up for
what he called a Muslim election next year.

- Malcolm Fraser ABC 2/11/2006

Every election, Howard creates DIVISION for a DIVERSION.



"We swear by the Southern Cross to stand truly by each other
and fight to defend our rights and liberties." - Eureka Oath

------------

The Official [Est. June 2000] aus.culture.true-blue FAQ ;

http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/faq.html


The true-blue Homestead;

http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/


The true-blue Hall Of Fame;

http://www.geocities.com/trueblue_hall_of_fame/index.html


The Tuckerbox;

http://www.geocities.com/true_blue_tucker_box/index.html


-----------

 
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45e0d5bf$0$5744$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> bjorn wrote:
>> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>
>
> "Race' is a delusion which indicates your Psychopathic personality.

Yet you use "ethnicity". When will you apologise for your racism?

BTW, still waiting for those "racist" quotes of mine. Why aren't you able to
find them, fagbags?

 
<fyfpoon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172355239.471125.129260@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
So, what is new (or old)? What can you do about it? These people
were brought up in the jungles and such as have jungle mentality.


On 2月25日, 上午6时06分, "bjorn" <uz4n4k...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>
> Racial differences in "average personality."
>
> by Richard Lynn

I think they lack those qualities mentioned in the article because African
never developed a written language.

All Africans, no matter from where they come from speak their local dialect
and the language of their colonial past, French,Belgian, Portuguese or
English...but they can only convey recent past through the colonial
language. They do not convey any long term history because nothing was
written down. They have their voodoo gods, dancing etc, all passed through
word of mouth. There is no development throughout their history. They have
never built anything other than mud huts for instance. Not even the wheel.

You just can't get away from the fact that they have limited vision. Their
imagination is solely expressed in handcraft goods and music. Without
written language there is no ABSTRACTION.

This is the difference between developed European Greek language BC and
other languages. Aristotelian Logic brought the white European mind into an
organised abstract world of thought. Without written language you don't
even know what that means.

Also, it can easily be seen from the behaviour of the British since WW2 that
you can easily and quickly lose that ability for abstraction if you follow
the behaviour of the African and forget your past and debase your written
language. The British are following African behaviour and African speech.
Their crime rate now is enormous and easily equivalent to African city
behaviour. This is not just the Blacks there but with the Anglo-Saxons.

The lesson for the rational thinking people is, do not allow Africans into
your country or you will end up like America, and Britain since the 1960s.

Tex wrote:
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> bjorn wrote:
>>
>>> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>>
>>
>> "Race' is a delusion which indicates your Psychopathic personality.
>>
>>> 2007-02-24
>>>
>>> Racial differences in "average personality."
>>
>> You can't measure 'racial differences' unless you can identify 'races'
>> and what we see here is the classic irrational racist belief that
>> 'skin colour' (or eye colour, or hair colour) defines something called
>> 'race'.. it doesn't;
>>
>> "In the United States both scholars and the general public have
>> been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate
>> divisions within the human species based on visible physical
>> differences.
>>
>> With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century,
>> however, it has become clear that human populations are not
>> unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups.
>>
>> Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most
>> physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> ...
>> This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups
>> than between them. In neighbouring populations there is much
>> overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions.
>>
>> Throughout history whenever different groups have come into
>> contact, they have interbred. "
>>
>> - American Anthropological Association
>>
>>>
>>> by Richard Lynn
>>
>> Lynn's work is often misused by racists, as is the case with this
>> Article from the White Supremacist website 'American Renaissance'
>> which sports articles such as 'Raising White Children' B^p
>>
>> The chief failure of racists is their failure to acknowledge
>> what Lynn attributes the variations in IQ to; Nutrition,
>> as in this example where a SINGLE ethnic group, Ashkenazi Jews
>> have a higher or lower IQ depending on the environment
>> in which they live;
>>
>> "Lynn has previously argued at length that nutrition
>> is the best supported environmental explanation for
>> variation in the lower range,[10] and a number of other
>> environmental explanations have been advanced (see below).
>> Ashkenazi Jews average 107 in the U.S. and Britain, but
>> lower in Israel"
>>
>> So, all the racists have to do is show how moving from a low
>> nutrition environment to a high nutrition environment alters your
>> 'race'!? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!
>>
>>
>>> For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
>>> societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
>>> pathology:
>>
>>
>> The prime determinant of health is economic well being.
>>
>> Centuries of slavery followed by social and economic deprivation
>> have discriminated against the very people the racists now want to
>> demonize further because of their disadvantage!
>>
>> But the fundamental flaw in their analysis is the pretence that
>> 'race' is defined by skin colour, where the pale skinned
>> Japanese and Scandinavians are the held to be the 'White race'.
>>
>>
>>
>> > When blacks and whites are matched for IQ,
>>
>> Black is a colour, not a 'race'
>>
>> The idea that 'Whites' are a race has no scientific basis,
>> just look at the white people, Japanese and Scandinavians,
>> and tell us the scientific taxonomy that defines them
>> as the same 'race'...
>>
>> The only sense in which they are is the universal truth,
>> all humans are descended from Africa, and they are part of ONE RACE,
>> the Human Race
>>
>> As racists cannot define 'races' with any rational scientific
>> taxonomy we must ask, 'What is the reason for the persistence
>> of racism as a belief?" and the answer is simple, it has been
>> used to justify slavery, discrimination and oppression for centuries!
>>
>> Racism is a cultural artefact used by low IQ, prejudiced bigots
>> for social control via discrimination.
>>
>> The psychological profile of the racist is described below;
>>
>>
>>> Psychopathic personality is a personality disorder of which the
>>> central feature is lack of a moral sense.
>>
>> key indicators include Slavery, Apartheid, the Ku Klux Klan,
>> Segregation, Lynchings, Nazi Eugenics, Cronulla riots, etc
>>
>> > The condition was first
>>> identified in the early nineteenth century by the British physician
>>> John Pritchard, who proposed the term "moral imbecility" for those
>>> deficient in moral sense but of normal intelligence.
>>
>> Pritchard's observations were based on the British subjects he
>> observed. (ie Europeans were the group in which moral imbeciles
>> were first identified and diagnosed)
>>
>>
>>> The term
>>> psychopathic personality was first used in 1915 by the German
>>> psychiatrist Emile Kraepelin and has been employed as a diagnostic
>>> label throughout the twentieth century.
>>
>> Kraepelin's observations were similarly based on the White European
>> subjects he observed. (i.e. Europeans were the group in which
>> psychopathic personalities were first identified and diagnosed)
>>
>> > In 1941 the condition was
>>> described by Hervey Cleckley in what has become a classic book, The
>>> Mask of Sanity. He described the condition as general poverty of
>>> emotional feelings, lack of remorse or shame, superficial charm,
>>> pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of insight, absence of
>>> nervousness, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
>>> to learn from experience, reckless behavior under the influence of
>>> alcohol, and a lack of long-term goals.
>>
>> Again, Cleckly worked in the West, where case studies were abundant,
>> and to this day, we find numerous examples worthy of study;
>>
>> bjorn - a Low IQ racist who thinks "White" is a race! B^D
>>
>> Tex/Tropicus (a shizoid sociopath)
>>
>> Infidel, Auntie-MoronCulture, Agora, Ned Latham, Nev Duguid,
>> all racists receiving psychiatric treatment for their illness.
>>

Speaking of 'moral imbeciles' and 'psychopathic personalities'. the
condition of "general poverty of emotional feelings, lack of
remorse or shame, pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of
insight, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
to learn from experience, and a lack of long-term goals", here's Tex;

> Yet you use "ethnicity".


Tex demonstrates how he exhibits the syndrome, being 'deficient
in moral sense'.

Tex has no interest in the comments of the srientific community
debunking racist superstitions, he ignores the American Association
of Anthropologists debunking of 'race', he has no interest in the
immmoral use to which racism has been put, from slavery to Nazi
Genocide.. none of these concern him because he is, as Pritchard
identified; "deficient in moral sense"

So he attempts to defend the racists, with the feeble ploy of
attempting to create semantic confusion. In a classic example of
Transference, he tries to avoid all discussion of 'race', introduce
a new topic, and demand those in the thread pursue his diversion!

He projects his own semantic confusion onto the world, just as we saw
with his inane assertion that 'only the Arabs were hitler's allies'
and then demands that sane people deal with his addle-pated confusion.

> When will you apologise for your racism?

Unlike you, I don't believe in or defend racism.
I attack it, and you attack me for doing so.

Q.E.D.

Your stupid semantic confusion is your problem,
your feeble quibbling clearly indicates you are
a lightweight incapable of addressing the substantive
issues.

No one has time to waste on psychopathic personalities like you,
take your meds and follow your shrinks advice.



>>>
>>> In 1984 the American Psychiatric Association dropped the term
>>> psychopathic personality and replaced it with "anti-social personality
>>> disorder." This is an expression of the increasing sentimentality of
>>> the second half of the twentieth century, in which terms that had
>>> acquired negative associations were replaced by euphemisms. There are
>>> other examples. Mentally retarded children are now called "slow
>>> learners" or even "exceptional children;" aggressive children now have
>>> "externalizing behaviors;" prostitutes are "sex workers;" tramps are
>>> now "the homeless," as if their houses were destroyed by earthquake;
>>> and people on welfare are "clients" of social workers. However, the
>>> term psychopathic personality remains useful.
>>
>> Lynn makes a persuasive argument that just as White Europeans provided
>> most of the subjects in whom various psychiatric disorders were
>> identified, it also produced the plethora of theories in what became a
>> popular and influential, if largely ineffectual discipline (Psychiatry
>> is largely a Western phenomenon, with Europe and America providing most
>> of the disorders as well as the theories, practitioners and cultists)
>>
>> The term pseudo-science has never been more useful than in
>> describing much of the modern replacement for priests and confession;
>> therapy and the Couch.
>>
>>> While psychopathic personality is a psychiatric disorder, it has long
>>> been regarded as the extreme expression of a personality trait that is
>>> continuously distributed throughout the population.
>>
>> None more so than among racists, immoral and irrational bigots
>> who have used pseudo science to justify eugenics and ethnic
>> cleansing.
>>
>> > In this respect it
>>> is like other psychiatric disorders. For instance, severe depression
>>> is a psychiatric disorder, but everyone feels depressed sometimes, and
>>> some normal people are depressed more often and more severely than
>>> others. It is the same with psychopathic personality. There are
>>> degrees of moral sense throughout the population, and psychopaths are
>>> the extreme group.
>>>
>>> There is a difference between blacks and whites-
>>
>> Wow, People who were herded onto slave ships, whipped, raped,
>> traduced, psychologically destroyed, oppressed, then told that
>> generations of environmental, including nutritional, deprivation
>> were not the cause of their under-performing, but that it was
>> something INNATE, due to their SKIN COLOUR, felt different to
>> white slaveowners?
>>
>> About as different as poor whites, who also have poor educational and
>> health outcomes compared to their Rich white cousins.
>>
>> In Australia, aboriginals were NOT ALLOWED To OWN LAND or OPEN
>> A BANK ACCOUNT, right up until living memory!
>>
>> Special permission was given to Albert Namatjira, once he became
>> an internationally recognised artistic genius, to buy a house,
>> a car, and have a bank account.
>>
>> Now we have racists trying to tell us the next generation of
>> aboriginals, raised in families who were LEGALLY prevented from
>> accessing the basis of entrepreneurial skills, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP,
>> are a bit slow in setting up businesses because their SKIN IS BLACK
>> rather than because, unlike the squattocracy and the bankers, they
>> don't have daddy to help you develop a share portfolio!?
>>
>> FFS!
>>
>> Take your RACIST shite and ram it up your fat white arse!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> For psychopathic personality, the mean and distribution
>>> are higher among blacks.
>>
>> Just like it was higher among the poor and the convicts transported to
>> OZ. Poorly educated, poor nutrition, limited opportunities,
>> they turned to anti-social activities, stealing food.
>>
>> Rich aristocrats are crazy behind the walled gardens of their stately
>> homes and clubs, they are 'eccentric' .. but poor crazies are crazy on
>> the streets, visible and without lawyers.
>>
>> The single greatest outbreak of Psychopathic madness in the past century
>> occurred in 'civilized' white Europe, when the Nazis destroyed Europe
>> in an attempt to implement their insane, violent, racist genocide.
>>
>>
>>> The effect of this is that there are more
>>> black psychopaths and more psychopathic behavior among blacks.
>>
>> Just as there is more heart disease and Glaucoma, among underclasses
>> no matter what their skin colour.
>>
>> Every Aussie battler knows that their kids chance of going to uni,
>> and their LIFE EXPECTANCY, is lower than that of the upper class
>> kids whose parents buy opportunities.
>>
>> Is there a poor 'race'? No, there is a poor class, and in some cases
>> it is most readily identified on the basis of an obvious difference,
>> such as Skin Colour, making it 10 times more likely the police will
>> pull them over than pull me over.
>>
>> Expectations can become self-fulfilling.
>>
>>> Full article
>>> http://www.amren.com/0207issue/0207issue.html#cover
>>
>>
>> Amren, the journal of White Racist Psychopaths
>


------------

"THE polls show John Howard is likely to be beaten
by Labor, now under its sharpest leader in a decade.
Facing defeat, the Prime Minister yesterday changed
not only his team but its tone." -Andrew Bolt 24/1/2007


Fraser accuses current PM of marginalising Muslims"

"I believe that this is divisive, dangerous and false."

"Mr Fraser said the Government was gearing up for
what he called a Muslim election next year.

- Malcolm Fraser ABC 2/11/2006

Every election, Howard creates DIVISION for a DIVERSION.



"We swear by the Southern Cross to stand truly by each other
and fight to defend our rights and liberties." - Eureka Oath

------------

The Official [Est. June 2000] aus.culture.true-blue FAQ ;

http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/faq.html


The true-blue Homestead;

http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/


The true-blue Hall Of Fame;

http://www.geocities.com/trueblue_hall_of_fame/index.html


The Tuckerbox;

http://www.geocities.com/true_blue_tucker_box/index.html


-----------

 
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45e0ddb5$0$5743$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Tex wrote:
>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>> bjorn wrote:
> >>
>>>> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>>>
>>>
>>> "Race' is a delusion which indicates your Psychopathic personality.
>>>
>>>> 2007-02-24
>>>>
>>>> Racial differences in "average personality."
>>>
>>> You can't measure 'racial differences' unless you can identify 'races'
>>> and what we see here is the classic irrational racist belief that
>>> 'skin colour' (or eye colour, or hair colour) defines something called
>>> 'race'.. it doesn't;
>>>
>>> "In the United States both scholars and the general public have
>>> been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate
>>> divisions within the human species based on visible physical
>>> differences.
>>>
>>> With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century,
>>> however, it has become clear that human populations are not
>>> unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups.
>>>
>>> Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most
>>> physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups.
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> ...
>>> This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups
>>> than between them. In neighbouring populations there is much
>>> overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions.
>>>
>>> Throughout history whenever different groups have come into
>>> contact, they have interbred. "
>>>
>>> - American Anthropological Association
>>>
>>>>
>>>> by Richard Lynn
>>>
>>> Lynn's work is often misused by racists, as is the case with this
>>> Article from the White Supremacist website 'American Renaissance'
>>> which sports articles such as 'Raising White Children' B^p
>>>
>>> The chief failure of racists is their failure to acknowledge
>>> what Lynn attributes the variations in IQ to; Nutrition,
>>> as in this example where a SINGLE ethnic group, Ashkenazi Jews
>>> have a higher or lower IQ depending on the environment
>>> in which they live;
>>>
>>> "Lynn has previously argued at length that nutrition
>>> is the best supported environmental explanation for
>>> variation in the lower range,[10] and a number of other
>>> environmental explanations have been advanced (see below).
>>> Ashkenazi Jews average 107 in the U.S. and Britain, but
>>> lower in Israel"
>>>
>>> So, all the racists have to do is show how moving from a low
>>> nutrition environment to a high nutrition environment alters your
>>> 'race'!? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!
>>>
>>>
>>>> For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
>>>> societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
>>>> pathology:
>>>
>>>
>>> The prime determinant of health is economic well being.
>>>
>>> Centuries of slavery followed by social and economic deprivation
>>> have discriminated against the very people the racists now want to
>>> demonize further because of their disadvantage!
>>>
>>> But the fundamental flaw in their analysis is the pretence that
>>> 'race' is defined by skin colour, where the pale skinned
>>> Japanese and Scandinavians are the held to be the 'White race'.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > When blacks and whites are matched for IQ,
>>>
>>> Black is a colour, not a 'race'
>>>
>>> The idea that 'Whites' are a race has no scientific basis,
>>> just look at the white people, Japanese and Scandinavians,
>>> and tell us the scientific taxonomy that defines them
>>> as the same 'race'...
>>>
>>> The only sense in which they are is the universal truth,
>>> all humans are descended from Africa, and they are part of ONE RACE,
>>> the Human Race
>>>
>>> As racists cannot define 'races' with any rational scientific
>>> taxonomy we must ask, 'What is the reason for the persistence
>>> of racism as a belief?" and the answer is simple, it has been
>>> used to justify slavery, discrimination and oppression for centuries!
>>>
>>> Racism is a cultural artefact used by low IQ, prejudiced bigots
>>> for social control via discrimination.
>>>
>>> The psychological profile of the racist is described below;
>>>
>>>
>>>> Psychopathic personality is a personality disorder of which the
>>>> central feature is lack of a moral sense.
>>>
>>> key indicators include Slavery, Apartheid, the Ku Klux Klan,
>>> Segregation, Lynchings, Nazi Eugenics, Cronulla riots, etc
>>>
>>> > The condition was first
>>>> identified in the early nineteenth century by the British physician
>>>> John Pritchard, who proposed the term "moral imbecility" for those
>>>> deficient in moral sense but of normal intelligence.
>>>
>>> Pritchard's observations were based on the British subjects he
>>> observed. (ie Europeans were the group in which moral imbeciles
>>> were first identified and diagnosed)
>>>
>>>
>>>> The term
>>>> psychopathic personality was first used in 1915 by the German
>>>> psychiatrist Emile Kraepelin and has been employed as a diagnostic
>>>> label throughout the twentieth century.
>>>
>>> Kraepelin's observations were similarly based on the White European
>>> subjects he observed. (i.e. Europeans were the group in which
>>> psychopathic personalities were first identified and diagnosed)
>>>
>>> > In 1941 the condition was
>>>> described by Hervey Cleckley in what has become a classic book, The
>>>> Mask of Sanity. He described the condition as general poverty of
>>>> emotional feelings, lack of remorse or shame, superficial charm,
>>>> pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of insight, absence of
>>>> nervousness, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
>>>> to learn from experience, reckless behavior under the influence of
>>>> alcohol, and a lack of long-term goals.
>>>
>>> Again, Cleckly worked in the West, where case studies were abundant,
>>> and to this day, we find numerous examples worthy of study;
>>>
>>> bjorn - a Low IQ racist who thinks "White" is a race! B^D
>>>
>>> Tex/Tropicus (a shizoid sociopath)
>>>
>>> Infidel, Auntie-MoronCulture, Agora, Ned Latham, Nev Duguid,
>>> all racists receiving psychiatric treatment for their illness.
>>>
>
> Speaking of 'moral imbeciles' and 'psychopathic personalities'. the
> condition of "general poverty of emotional feelings, lack of
> remorse or shame, pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of
> insight, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
> to learn from experience, and a lack of long-term goals", here's Tex;
>
> > Yet you use "ethnicity".
>
>
> Tex demonstrates how he exhibits the syndrome, being 'deficient
> in moral sense'.
>
> Tex has no interest in the comments of the srientific community
> debunking racist superstitions, he ignores the American Association
> of Anthropologists debunking of 'race', he has no interest in the
> immmoral use to which racism has been put, from slavery to Nazi
> Genocide.. none of these concern him because he is, as Pritchard
> identified; "deficient in moral sense"

Pointing out your hypocrisy isn't morally deficient

> So he attempts to defend the racists

Where have I done any such thing? Can't you go a single post without telling
lies?

>, with the feeble ploy of
> attempting to create semantic confusion.

I have attempted no such thing, merely pointing out your hypocrisy in
calling the very usage of "race" to be "racist" while you happily use the
other unscientific construct of "ethnicity"

> In a classic example of
> Transference, he tries to avoid all discussion of 'race', introduce
> a new topic, and demand those in the thread pursue his diversion!

If I'm "avoiding all discussion" of race, then why am I pointing out your
hypocrisy in talking about that very topic?

> He projects his own semantic confusion onto the world, just as we saw
> with his inane assertion that 'only the Arabs were hitler's allies'
> and then demands that sane people deal with his addle-pated confusion.

Hey, you're the only one who thinks a discussion on arabs and jews should
include italian dictators.

> > When will you apologise for your racism?
>
> Unlike you, I don't believe in or defend racism.

Where do it "believe in" or "defend" racism? I guess you still haven't found
those "racist" quotes of mine yet. No surprise there.

> I attack it, and you attack me for doing so.
>
> Q.E.D.

You call me a racist, yet you cannot find a single racist quote of mine.

Now, when will you apologise for being a liar and a racist?

> Your stupid semantic confusion is your problem,

Confusion seems to be your main problem, which is why you think a discussion
on "arabs and jews" should include an italian dictator :)

bjorn wrote:

>Race and Psychopathic Personality
>
>2007-02-24
>
>Racial differences in "average personality."
>
>by Richard Lynn
>
>For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
>societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
>pathology: crime, illegitimacy, poverty, school failure, and long-term
>unemployment. The conventional liberal explanation for this is white
>"racism," past and present, which has forced blacks into self-
>destructive choices. More clear-headed observers, however, have sought
>a partial explanation in the low average IQ of blacks.
>
>

God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
several deciles lower.


>Low IQ can lead to crime because less intelligent children do poorly
>at school and fail to learn the skills needed to get well-paid jobs,
>or even any job. Unemployment is therefore two to three times higher
>among blacks than whites. People without jobs need money, and have
>relatively little to lose by robbery or burglary, and may therefore
>commit property crimes. The association between low intelligence and
>crime holds for whites as well, among whom the average IQ of criminals
>is about 84.
>
>
Explain why Bush, Cheney and a whole swag of Ivy-league graduates are
responsible for a 4-month mission turning into 4-years plus
half-a-million dead civilians plus chaos plus more terrorism plus no
closer to an arrest of bin Laden?

Low IQ WASPs

>Nevertheless, as Charles Murray and the late Richard Herrnstein showed
>in their book The Bell Curve, low IQ cannot entirely explain a black
>crime rate that is six-and-a-half times the white rate. When blacks
>and whites are matched for IQ, blacks still commit crimes at two-and-
>a-half times the white rate. This shows that blacks must have some
>other characteristic, besides low intelligence, that explains their
>high levels of criminality.
>
>
Add up all of the crime in the US and it doesn't amount to a hill of
beans compared with the atrocity which is the Iraq war.

Get some perspective.

<snip other garbage>

 
"Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:45e0dfb9$0$23346$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:45e0ddb5$0$5743$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Tex wrote:
>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> bjorn wrote:
>> >>
>>>>> Race and Psychopathic Personality
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Race' is a delusion which indicates your Psychopathic personality.
>>>>
>>>>> 2007-02-24
>>>>>
>>>>> Racial differences in "average personality."
>>>>
>>>> You can't measure 'racial differences' unless you can identify 'races'
>>>> and what we see here is the classic irrational racist belief that
>>>> 'skin colour' (or eye colour, or hair colour) defines something called
>>>> 'race'.. it doesn't;
>>>>
>>>> "In the United States both scholars and the general public have
>>>> been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate
>>>> divisions within the human species based on visible physical
>>>> differences.
>>>>
>>>> With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century,
>>>> however, it has become clear that human populations are not
>>>> unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups.
>>>>
>>>> Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that
>>>> most
>>>> physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups.
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> ...
>>>> This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups
>>>> than between them. In neighbouring populations there is much
>>>> overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions.
>>>>
>>>> Throughout history whenever different groups have come into
>>>> contact, they have interbred. "
>>>>
>>>> - American Anthropological Association
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> by Richard Lynn
>>>>
>>>> Lynn's work is often misused by racists, as is the case with this
>>>> Article from the White Supremacist website 'American Renaissance'
>>>> which sports articles such as 'Raising White Children' B^p
>>>>
>>>> The chief failure of racists is their failure to acknowledge
>>>> what Lynn attributes the variations in IQ to; Nutrition,
>>>> as in this example where a SINGLE ethnic group, Ashkenazi Jews
>>>> have a higher or lower IQ depending on the environment
>>>> in which they live;
>>>>
>>>> "Lynn has previously argued at length that nutrition
>>>> is the best supported environmental explanation for
>>>> variation in the lower range,[10] and a number of other
>>>> environmental explanations have been advanced (see below).
>>>> Ashkenazi Jews average 107 in the U.S. and Britain, but
>>>> lower in Israel"
>>>>
>>>> So, all the racists have to do is show how moving from a low
>>>> nutrition environment to a high nutrition environment alters your
>>>> 'race'!? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> For as long as official statistics have been kept, blacks in white
>>>>> societies have been overrepresented in all indices of social
>>>>> pathology:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The prime determinant of health is economic well being.
>>>>
>>>> Centuries of slavery followed by social and economic deprivation
>>>> have discriminated against the very people the racists now want to
>>>> demonize further because of their disadvantage!
>>>>
>>>> But the fundamental flaw in their analysis is the pretence that
>>>> 'race' is defined by skin colour, where the pale skinned
>>>> Japanese and Scandinavians are the held to be the 'White race'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > When blacks and whites are matched for IQ,
>>>>
>>>> Black is a colour, not a 'race'
>>>>
>>>> The idea that 'Whites' are a race has no scientific basis,
>>>> just look at the white people, Japanese and Scandinavians,
>>>> and tell us the scientific taxonomy that defines them
>>>> as the same 'race'...
>>>>
>>>> The only sense in which they are is the universal truth,
>>>> all humans are descended from Africa, and they are part of ONE RACE,
>>>> the Human Race
>>>>
>>>> As racists cannot define 'races' with any rational scientific
>>>> taxonomy we must ask, 'What is the reason for the persistence
>>>> of racism as a belief?" and the answer is simple, it has been
>>>> used to justify slavery, discrimination and oppression for centuries!
>>>>
>>>> Racism is a cultural artefact used by low IQ, prejudiced bigots
>>>> for social control via discrimination.
>>>>
>>>> The psychological profile of the racist is described below;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Psychopathic personality is a personality disorder of which the
>>>>> central feature is lack of a moral sense.
>>>>
>>>> key indicators include Slavery, Apartheid, the Ku Klux Klan,
>>>> Segregation, Lynchings, Nazi Eugenics, Cronulla riots, etc
>>>>
>>>> > The condition was first
>>>>> identified in the early nineteenth century by the British physician
>>>>> John Pritchard, who proposed the term "moral imbecility" for those
>>>>> deficient in moral sense but of normal intelligence.
>>>>
>>>> Pritchard's observations were based on the British subjects he
>>>> observed. (ie Europeans were the group in which moral imbeciles
>>>> were first identified and diagnosed)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The term
>>>>> psychopathic personality was first used in 1915 by the German
>>>>> psychiatrist Emile Kraepelin and has been employed as a diagnostic
>>>>> label throughout the twentieth century.
>>>>
>>>> Kraepelin's observations were similarly based on the White European
>>>> subjects he observed. (i.e. Europeans were the group in which
>>>> psychopathic personalities were first identified and diagnosed)
>>>>
>>>> > In 1941 the condition was
>>>>> described by Hervey Cleckley in what has become a classic book, The
>>>>> Mask of Sanity. He described the condition as general poverty of
>>>>> emotional feelings, lack of remorse or shame, superficial charm,
>>>>> pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of insight, absence of
>>>>> nervousness, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
>>>>> to learn from experience, reckless behavior under the influence of
>>>>> alcohol, and a lack of long-term goals.
>>>>
>>>> Again, Cleckly worked in the West, where case studies were abundant,
>>>> and to this day, we find numerous examples worthy of study;
>>>>
>>>> bjorn - a Low IQ racist who thinks "White" is a race! B^D
>>>>
>>>> Tex/Tropicus (a shizoid sociopath)
>>>>
>>>> Infidel, Auntie-MoronCulture, Agora, Ned Latham, Nev Duguid,
>>>> all racists receiving psychiatric treatment for their illness.
>>>>
>>
>> Speaking of 'moral imbeciles' and 'psychopathic personalities'. the
>> condition of "general poverty of emotional feelings, lack of
>> remorse or shame, pathological lying, egocentricity, a lack of
>> insight, an inability to love, impulsive antisocial acts, failure
>> to learn from experience, and a lack of long-term goals", here's Tex;
>>
>> > Yet you use "ethnicity".
>>
>>
>> Tex demonstrates how he exhibits the syndrome, being 'deficient
>> in moral sense'.
>>
>> Tex has no interest in the comments of the srientific community
>> debunking racist superstitions, he ignores the American Association
>> of Anthropologists debunking of 'race', he has no interest in the
>> immmoral use to which racism has been put, from slavery to Nazi
>> Genocide.. none of these concern him because he is, as Pritchard
>> identified; "deficient in moral sense"
>
> Pointing out your hypocrisy isn't morally deficient
>
>> So he attempts to defend the racists
>
> Where have I done any such thing? Can't you go a single post without
> telling lies?
>
>>, with the feeble ploy of
>> attempting to create semantic confusion.
>
> I have attempted no such thing, merely pointing out your hypocrisy in
> calling the very usage of "race" to be "racist" while you happily use the
> other unscientific construct of "ethnicity"
>
>> In a classic example of
>> Transference, he tries to avoid all discussion of 'race', introduce
>> a new topic, and demand those in the thread pursue his diversion!
>
> If I'm "avoiding all discussion" of race, then why am I pointing out your
> hypocrisy in talking about that very topic?
>
>> He projects his own semantic confusion onto the world, just as we saw
>> with his inane assertion that 'only the Arabs were hitler's allies'
>> and then demands that sane people deal with his addle-pated confusion.
>
> Hey, you're the only one who thinks a discussion on arabs and jews should
> include italian dictators.
>
>> > When will you apologise for your racism?
>>
>> Unlike you, I don't believe in or defend racism.
>
> Where do it "believe in" or "defend" racism? I guess you still haven't
> found those "racist" quotes of mine yet. No surprise there.
>
>> I attack it, and you attack me for doing so.
>>
>> Q.E.D.
>
> You call me a racist, yet you cannot find a single racist quote of mine.
>
> Now, when will you apologise for being a liar and a racist?
>
>> Your stupid semantic confusion is your problem,
>
> Confusion seems to be your main problem, which is why you think a
> discussion on "arabs and jews" should include an italian dictator :)


Leave the poor bastard alone to his dribbling.

B J Foster wrote:

>
> God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
> lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
> several deciles lower.
>

I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.

I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.

?????

Spectator wrote:

> B J Foster wrote:
>
> >
> > God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
> > lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
> > several deciles lower.
> >
>
> I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
> worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
> nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
>
> I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
> high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
> somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
>
> ?????


You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.

In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Spectator wrote:
>
> > B J Foster wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
> > > lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
> > > several deciles lower.
> > >
> >
> > I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
> > worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
> > nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
> >
> > I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
> > high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
> > somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
> >
> > ?????
>
>
> You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.

It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
those you condemn.
CS

On Feb 25, 10:18 am, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
> In Australia, aboriginals were NOT ALLOWED To OWN LAND or OPEN
> A BANK ACCOUNT, right up until living memory!
>
> Special permission was given to Albert Namatjira, once he became
> an internationally recognised artistic genius, to buy a house,
> a car, and have a bank account.

Albert Namatjira , THE FIRST aboriginal to be given the rights of a
white man , he had money from his art sales but could not buy a
house , this was less than 50 years ago

Whithin one year the angry racist KKK bastards had him jailed on
trumped up charges , they found a bottle of meths in his truck , with
his arts / paint supplies and he got jailed

One year later he was DEAD , 10 years later aboriginals were given the
vote

Clearly the white people have long benifited from centuries of vastly
different rights

Its a wonder that any non whites even survived

This is not evidence of a higher IQ

It more correctly shows how whites have a problem called " anti social
baehavior " or " psychopathic personality "

Aboriginal people lived on tasmania for many thousands of years , but
within 50 years of contact with whites , the native people were 95%
plus all dead

This happened in most areas where white people went

Clearly its the white people who have a problem with " anti social
psycopathic personalities "

AND as to a low IQ

I suppose there is a wide range in every town , city , or country or
even in a single family there seems a very wide range

Coming from Australia , I often wonder if adventurers had a high IQ or
a personality " trait " that attracted the most adventurist young
people to go over the hill to " SEE " what was there

We all know some kids who have this " trait " , they love exploring ,
and are often the " bright " kids , and the ones who get into all
manner of trouble because they test the limits , very often
impulsively

These types tend to become leaders , explorers , frontiers men , early
adapters , pioneers

We see them throughout history in ALL countrys

They are often our heros or founding fathers

Australia has ALWAYS been at the extreme " END OF THE EARTH " in
location , it was a very long way from the cradles of civilizations ,

I suspect Australia and sth Africa and sth America have a higher
percentage of " explorer " genes, going back to the stone age

Only the toughest , most adventureous , and " survivours " might leave
a trait in the desendants of today

I even see people who come to Australia today , are self selecting for
a trait of " have a go "

Australia has ALWAYS been a big step , that the timid would shy away
from

ONLY the toughest can survive / thrive even today, its actually
likely it has always been that way

Less bold people prefer to stay where they are , its safe and
comfortable ,

AUSTRALIA has been almost as remote as a trip to the moon in todays
world

The tasmanian aboriginals were very likely the first humans to make
the long trip , long ago , they would have been like todays " space
travellers "m

Exploring the very limits of the universe , NOT as some people claim ,
a backward tribe , at one time they were probably the highest IQ on
the planet ???? i 10,000 years ago

They have been cut off from everybody { lost in space } for 10,000
years untill 1800 , and the world had learned heaps in 10,000 years

BUT did all that learning mean the tasmanian aboriginals were low IQ
or high IQ , they survived 10,000 years " lost in space "

SO white christian capitalists decieded to kill them and steal every
thing they had

WHO IS THE PSYCHOPATH ????
> Now we have racists trying to tell us the next generation of
> aboriginals, raised in families who were LEGALLY prevented from
> accessing the basis of entrepreneurial skills, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP,
> are a bit slow in setting up businesses because their SKIN IS BLACK

Cultural Supremacist wrote:

>In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Spectator wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>B J Foster wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
>>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
>>>>several deciles lower.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
>>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
>>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
>>>
>>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
>>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
>>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
>>>
>>>?????
>>>
>>>
>>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
>>
>>
>
>It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
>IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
>those you condemn.
>CS
>
>

Did you mean "libelling"?

Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.

What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
brain function and brain dysfunction itself.

http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/riqs.htm
http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/nazi6.jpg

In article <45e11f99$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>
> >In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> > B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Spectator wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>B J Foster wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
> >>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
> >>>>several deciles lower.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
> >>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
> >>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
> >>>
> >>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
> >>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
> >>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
> >>>
> >>>?????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
> >IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
> >those you condemn.
> >CS
> >
> >
>
> Did you mean "libelling"?

Either spelling is correct, check a dictionary.

>
> Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.

Okay, *you* may not recognize "race" but government does, ethnic
political lobbying groups do, and the medical profession does, just to
name a few. You are definitely out of the main on that.

> The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
> of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
> so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.

Oh, come on, you're being silly. There is more to "race", or ethnicity
if you prefer that term, than "the presence of a sun-resistant pigment
in their skin". Ask any physician.

>
> What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
> inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
> brain function and brain dysfunction itself.

Don't you mean high "melanin" levels cannot "possibly" affect...?

Also, you need to define what you believe is "brain dysfunction".
CS

>
> http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/riqs.htm
> http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/nazi6.jpg

Cultural Supremacist wrote:

>In article <45e11f99$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
>>>B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Spectator wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
>>>>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
>>>>>>several deciles lower.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
>>>>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
>>>>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
>>>>>
>>>>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
>>>>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
>>>>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
>>>>>
>>>>>?????
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
>>>IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
>>>those you condemn.
>>>CS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Did you mean "libelling"?
>>
>>
>
>Either spelling is correct, check a dictionary.
>
>
No need. Did you mean an *English* dictionary?

>
>
>>Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
>>
>>
>
>Okay, *you* may not recognize "race" but government does, ethnic
>political lobbying groups do, and the medical profession does, just to
>name a few. You are definitely out of the main on that.
>
>
You claimed that I was racist.

How does the government, lobby groups and *especially* the medical
profession define race?
(this should be interesting)

>
>
>>The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
>>of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
>>so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
>>
>>
>
>Oh, come on, you're being silly. There is more to "race", or ethnicity
>if you prefer that term, than "the presence of a sun-resistant pigment
>in their skin". Ask any physician.
>
>
I did. There is *no* definition.

>
>
>
>>What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
>>inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
>>brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
>>
>>
>
>Don't you mean high "melanin" levels cannot "possibly" affect...?
>
>
I meant the strong correlation between inability to conclude and brain
dysfunction. Surely this is obvious?


>Also, you need to define what you believe is "brain dysfunction".
>
>
Low IQ

>CS
>
>
>
>>http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/riqs.htm
>>http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/nazi6.jpg
>>
>>

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:27:23 +1100, B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
>The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
>of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
>so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
>
>What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
>inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
>brain function and brain dysfunction itself.

Actually, skin pigmentation is the least significant difference
between the races, even though it's the most obvious. The real factors
that determine racial differences are internal, such as brain
structure, behavior, and IQ.

Think about it. Blacks don't act like animals just because of their
skin color. Whites don't send planetary probes throughout the solar
system just because of their skin color.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Me wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:27:23 +1100, B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
>>The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
>>of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
>>so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
>>
>>What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
>>inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
>>brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
>>
>>
>
>Actually, skin pigmentation is the least significant difference
>between the races, even though it's the most obvious. The real factors
>that determine racial differences are internal, such as brain
>structure, behavior, and IQ.
>
>Think about it. Blacks don't act like animals just because of their
>skin color. Whites don't send planetary probes throughout the solar
>system just because of their skin color.
>
>
Fortunately the *individuals* who sent planetary probes throughout(?)
the solar system were not crippled by the brain dysfunction which
afflicts racists.

In alt.politics.british on Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Stan
<ecreipt@bigpond.net.au> wrote :
>>
>> Racial differences in "average personality."
>>
>> by Richard Lynn
>
> I think they lack those qualities mentioned in the article because African
>never developed a written language.

I think the ancient Egyptians might disagree with the above...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

In article <45e13bb9$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>
> >In article <45e11f99$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> > B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Cultural Supremacist wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> >>>B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Spectator wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>B J Foster wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
> >>>>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
> >>>>>>several deciles lower.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
> >>>>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
> >>>>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
> >>>>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
> >>>>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>?????
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
> >>>IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
> >>>those you condemn.
> >>>CS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Did you mean "libelling"?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Either spelling is correct, check a dictionary.
> >
> >
> No need. Did you mean an *English* dictionary?

What else? Are we conversing in Russian?

>
> >
> >
> >>Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Okay, *you* may not recognize "race" but government does, ethnic
> >political lobbying groups do, and the medical profession does, just to
> >name a few. You are definitely out of the main on that.
> >
> >
> You claimed that I was racist.
>
> How does the government, lobby groups and *especially* the medical
> profession define race?
> (this should be interesting)

I don't care how they define race, so you can ask them. Government has
racial quotas in employment, for example; racial lobbying groups like
the NAACP lobby government for perks for blacks; physicians look for
disease states predominant in different races, like sickle cell anemia
in blacks. Why are you being obstinate?

>
> >
> >
> >>The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
> >>of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
> >>so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Oh, come on, you're being silly. There is more to "race", or ethnicity
> >if you prefer that term, than "the presence of a sun-resistant pigment
> >in their skin". Ask any physician.
> >
> >
> I did. There is *no* definition.

Tell that to government, the NAACP, the Black Congressional Caucus and
other racial lobbying groups, universities who have race-based inclusion
quotas for admissions, and etc. Maybe they'll believe you, too.

>
> >
> >
> >
> >>What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
> >>inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
> >>brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Don't you mean high "melanin" levels cannot "possibly" affect...?
> >
> >
> I meant the strong correlation between inability to conclude and brain
> dysfunction. Surely this is obvious?

Not by what you stated. You were talking about melatonin, a hormone, not
melanin which controls skin pigmentation. Did you suffer a little brain
dysfunction with that?

>
>
> >Also, you need to define what you believe is "brain dysfunction".
> >
> >
> Low IQ

Oh, so you're an elitist.
CS

Cultural Supremacist wrote:

>In article <45e13bb9$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In article <45e11f99$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
>>>B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
>>>>>B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Spectator wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
>>>>>>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
>>>>>>>>several deciles lower.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
>>>>>>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
>>>>>>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
>>>>>>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
>>>>>>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>?????
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
>>>>>IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
>>>>>those you condemn.
>>>>>CS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Did you mean "libelling"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Either spelling is correct, check a dictionary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>No need. Did you mean an *English* dictionary?
>>
>>
>
>What else? Are we conversing in Russian?
>
>

Mostly English, I'd say


>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Okay, *you* may not recognize "race" but government does, ethnic
>>>political lobbying groups do, and the medical profession does, just to
>>>name a few. You are definitely out of the main on that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>You claimed that I was racist.
>>
>>How does the government, lobby groups and *especially* the medical
>>profession define race?
>>(this should be interesting)
>>
>>
>
>I don't care how they define race, so you can ask them. Government has
>racial quotas in employment, for example; racial lobbying groups like
>the NAACP lobby government for perks for blacks; physicians look for
>disease states predominant in different races, like sickle cell anemia
>in blacks. Why are you being obstinate?
>
>
Well I don't care either. You claimed that *I* was racist.

I couldn't give a stuff about the government, but since you raised it
why don't you back up your own argument with some substance. If you
can't define race then WTF are you on about?

>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
>>>>of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
>>>>so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Oh, come on, you're being silly. There is more to "race", or ethnicity
>>>if you prefer that term, than "the presence of a sun-resistant pigment
>>>in their skin". Ask any physician.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I did. There is *no* definition.
>>
>>
>
>Tell that to government, the NAACP, the Black Congressional Caucus and
>other racial lobbying groups, universities who have race-based inclusion
>quotas for admissions, and etc. Maybe they'll believe you, too.
>
>
See above.

>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
>>>>inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
>>>>brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Don't you mean high "melanin" levels cannot "possibly" affect...?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I meant the strong correlation between inability to conclude and brain
>>dysfunction. Surely this is obvious?
>>
>>
>
>Not by what you stated. You were talking about melatonin, a hormone, not
>melanin which controls skin pigmentation. Did you suffer a little brain
>dysfunction with that?
>
>
Whatever. The relevance is about the same.

>
>
>>
>>
>>>Also, you need to define what you believe is "brain dysfunction".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Low IQ
>>
>>
>
>Oh, so you're an elitist.
>CS
>
>
No I'm a 'definitionist'. LOL

bjorn....

I think a lt of it has to do with te person no matter what race they
are. I have a black brother in law,that is pretty intellegent, that has
have every opportunity in the world. grew up in a well to do familiy,
went to college, got the best jobs etc. Yet he could never lived up to
his financial committments, or keep the jobs he got.

He never would pay his college loan, had 3 childern, by 3 different
women,two of which he married, for the ones he married he always bought
and done things in their name, to keep from being traced so that he
would not have to pay child support. leaving these 2 women in debt up to
their necks with babies. he eventually got on crack, and robbed a bank.
Now here is what his problem is...he always blamed someone else for his
own actions.

When he showed up late at work, are had nasty additudes with cunstomers
and got fired, it was always the white mans' fault,
when they witheld his taxes, for not paying his college loan, it was the
white man's fault, when he got married and had children that needed
things, it was the white man's fault, when he got divorced, andwas
orgered to pay child support...it was the white man's fault, when he
strating using crack it was the white man's fault, when he robbed a bank
it was the white man's fault...

According to him all his life he has been a victim of the white man,
instead of realizing he has been his own victim, because of his own
racism, and his lack of responsibility to deal with the consequences of
his own actions. where you believe it or not after while people get
tired of hearing this shit, and do not want to have anything to do with
people like this. They are just plain assholes, but of course even that
is the white man's fault because no one any longer wants to deal with
him, or his additudes, therefore there is no one else to blame but the
white man.

Racist like his are te ones that keep racism going, and isolates
different races from each other. I personally have no problems with
other races unless they have the additude that my brother in law
has...that the world owes them a living, and that people are there just
to be used
for his own financial gain, or that he has no responsibility for his own
actions.

I wish there was some where to send this jerk...tat was so far away that
his bull shit would never touch another human being...
he is the infection that is racism.

> Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
> The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
> of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
> so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.

Racists score low in IQ tests?
No they don't the Japanese have the highest IQ scores in the world and they
are very racist.

Also it's not just skin colour that is different in racial groups it's
average brain size as well.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Chart_02.jpg

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:27:23 +1100 B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:

:> Cultural Supremacist wrote:
:>
:> >In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
:> > B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
B J Foster wrote:

:> >>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
:> >>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
:> >>>>several deciles lower.

:> >>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
:> >>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
:> >>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.

:> >>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
:> >>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
:> >>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
:> >>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.

Cultural:
:> >It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
:> >IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
:> >those you condemn.
:> >CS

B J Foster wrote:
:> Did you mean "libelling"?
:>
:> Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
If you do not "recognise 'race' as a concept" how could you recognise a
"rascist"??

:> The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
:> of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
:> so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
I.Q. isn't a measure of the dark pigment in skin. It's a measure of how well
what is between the ears works.

:> What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
:> inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
:> brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
It's not ruled out either.


Regards,

-- Siegen
----------------------
---------------------

Siegen wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:27:23 +1100 B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:> Cultural Supremacist wrote:
>:>
>:> >In article <45e114d6$0$11741$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
>:> > B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote:
>B J Foster wrote:
>
>:> >>>>God clearly has a sense of humour, because racists consistently have
>:> >>>>lower IQs than the general population - and not just a few points,
>:> >>>>several deciles lower.
>
>:> >>>I've known racists who were school dropouts. One from grade 10, and a
>:> >>>worse one had only a grade 6 education(?). You wouldn't believe the
>:> >>>nonsense and drivel they'd spout even when it wasn't a racist rant.
>
>:> >>>I only know for sure of one racist I've known personally who claimed
>:> >>>high school graduation. Even his general knowledge of the world was
>:> >>>somewhat limited, and he could generaly act just plain ... weird.
>:> >>You might say that 'Racists are rooted in their own inherent inferiority'.
>
>Cultural:
>:> >It is clear that you all are libeling blacks with your comments on low
>:> >IQ, high school dropouts, and inherent inferiority. You are as racist as
>:> >those you condemn.
>:> >CS
>
>B J Foster wrote:
>:> Did you mean "libelling"?
>:>
>:> Since I don't recognise 'race' as a concept your claim is not possible.
>If you do not "recognise 'race' as a concept" how could you recognise a
>"rascist"??
>
>

Didn't you mean "racist"?

Do I have to spell everything out for you?

I don't believe in Islam, but I can recognise a Muslim.
I don't believe in ghosts, but I can recognise ghostbusters.

Should I go on?


>:> The idea of attributing more or less ability to someone merely because
>:> of the presence of a sun-resistant pigment in their skin (melatonin) is
>:> so laughable, it's no wonder racists consistently score lower in IQ tests.
>I.Q. isn't a measure of the dark pigment in skin.
>
>
No kidding?

>It's a measure of how well
>what is between the ears works.
>
>
The brain controls body functions like temperature, digestion, blood
pressure, sleep as well as emotions. Have fun explaining how these
things are measured by IQ tests.

Limiting the discussion about "what is between the ears" to
intelligence, have fun explaining how IQ tests measure coordination,
musical ability, spatial ability and motor skills, i.e. the dimensions
of intelligence *not* measured by IQ tests.

>:> What is recognisable however is a strong correlation between the
>:> inability to conclude that high melatonin levels cannot possible affect
>:> brain function and brain dysfunction itself.
>It's not ruled out either.
>
>

You've been in the sun too long

>
>Regards,
>
>-- Siegen
>----------------------
>---------------------
>
>
>