kompressor
Feb 25, 2007, 8:51 PM
Reportar Abuso
|
Iarnrod wrote:
> On Feb 25, 9:53 am, kompressor <m...@des.benz> wrote:
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> kompressor <m...@des.benz> wrote in news:ZP9Eh.3718$_X1.3164
>>> @fe05.news.easynews.com:
>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> kompressor <m...@des.benz> wrote in news:%47Eh.5412$k82.1626
>>>>> @fe07.news.easynews.com:
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> "Larry (Scratch)" <Scra...@Tigard.OR.com> wrote in news:4t-
>>>>>>> dnb7N5a2wOH3YnZ2dnUVZ_s7in...@comcast.com:
>>>>>>>> Al Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 12:27 pm, use...@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Al Smith <caddyshack...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>>>> http://www.break.com/index/pro_abortionist_attacks_pro_life_woman.html
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice...
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think you're anything but foolish for saying that
>>>>> 'leftists'
>>>>>>>>>> are represented by a single person whose stated gripe had nothing
>>> to
>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>> with the political message, but the images of dead fetuses on
>>>>>>>>>> signboards?
>>>>>>>>> Because it happens all the time. It's not an isolated incident.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv9xa-VxchM
>>>>>>>>> Tell you what. You park your car with a "Kerry Edwards" sticker in
>>> my
>>>>>>>>> neighborhood, I'll park my car with a "Bush Cheney" in your
>>>>>>>>> neighborhood. I'll pay for your repairs and you pay for mine.
>>>>>>>> yep! Leftists believe in free speech just as long as IT IS THEIR FREE
>>>>>>>> SPEECH.
>>>>>>> Shooting abortion doctors in the back and
>>>>>> Compares in what numbers to owning the mass media and controlling the
>>>>>> universities?
>>>>> Who controls what universities?
>>>> Uh.....the LEFT!
>>> That explains "leftist" college professors like
>>> Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey and Phil Gramm and Henry
>>> Kissinger and Ken Starr.
>>> Yeah, right.....................
>> And they constitute the MAJORITY????
>>
>> Liberal bias in colleges bleeds into classroom
>> by Cal Thomas
>> Townhall.com
>> March 31, 2005http://www.townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/ct20050330.shtml
>>
>> You'd better sit down and firmly grip your bowl of Corn Flakes while
>> reading this shocking news: College faculties are not only mostly
>> liberal, but lean even further to the left than conservatives have imagined.
>>
>> According to a study by professors at Smith College, George Mason
>> University and the University of Toronto (they surveyed 1,643 full-time
>> faculty at 183 four-year schools), 72 percent of professors at American
>> universities labeled themselves liberal, while just 15 percent said they
>> are conservative. 50 percent of faculty members identified themselves as
>> Democrats and only 11 percent Republicans.
>>
>> Political Science professors Robert Lichter of George Mason University,
>> Neil Nevitte of the University of Toronto and Stanley Rothman of Smith
>> College also found that 51 percent of those surveyed said they rarely or
>> never attend church or synagogue. University, Neil Nevitte of the
>> University of Toronto and Stanley Rothman of Smith College also found
>> that 51 percent of those surveyed said they rarely or never attend
>> church or synagogue.
>>
>> These liberal leanings translate into liberal political beliefs. 84
>> percent of those surveyed are strongly or somewhat in favor of abortion
>> rights, 67 percent think homosexuality is acceptable, 88 percent want
>> more environmental protection "even if it raises prices or costs jobs"
>> and 65 percent want the government to ensure full employment, which puts
>> the professors to the left of the Democratic Party.
>>
>> The study, appearing in the March issue of the online political journal
>> the Forum, was funded by the Randolph Foundation, which donates to
>> mostly conservative organizations.
>>
>> Jonathan Knight, director of academic freedom and tenure for the
>> American Association of University Professors, was asked about the
>> study. He told The Washington Post, "The question is how this translates
>> into what happens within the academic community on such issues as
>> curriculum, admission of students, evaluation of students, evaluation of
>> faculty for salary and promotion."
>>
>> Knight added he is not aware of "any good evidence" linking the personal
>> views of professors to what they teach. He must be living in an ivory
>> tower without Internet access, or he believes surveys such as this one
>> are "bad evidence" because they don't conform to his views.
>>
>> A quick Google search of "liberalism on college campuses" brings a
>> wealth of good evidence that what is being taught on many of them is
>> anti-American, anti-religious, anti-Israel, pro-gay rights and
>> pro-abortion, often to the exclusion and ridicule of opposing views.
>>
>> In December, Columbia University appointed a committee to look into
>> charges of bias and intimidation by faculty, particularly in Middle East
>> studies. Columbia isn't the only university with bias problems when it
>> comes to the Middle East. Checkoutwww.campus-watch.orgfor many more
>> examples.
>>
>> WardChurchill, a tenured professor at the University of Colorado, is in
>> the news for his grotesque characterization of the 9/11 victims as
>> "little Eichmanns" who were not casualties of terrorism, but legitimate
>> "military targets." His views are part of his teaching.
>>
>> From "gay rights" courses, even majors, at an increasing number of
>> colleges, to the usual anti-military and anti-free enterprise bilge that
>> has been documented in numerous books and articles, only those who are
>> in complete denial would claim there is no link between the mostly
>> liberal views of professors and how they shape their subject matter in
>> the classroom, at numerous forums and in campus advocacy groups that
>> constitute modern academic life.
>>
>> Thomas Reeves of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute has said
>> "conservatives are discriminated against routinely and deliberately" in
>> faculty hiring, making some highly qualified teachers virtually
>> unemployable because of their political and social views. This
>> guarantees a perpetuation of a one-dimensional approach to most subjects.
>>
>> In matters of race and gender, colleges practice affirmative action to
>> employ more minority and female professors and attract more students
>> with these characteristics. Why won't they do the same for conservative
>> professors and students in the name of diversity, pluralism and academic
>> freedom?
>>
>> http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005...
>>
>> YET ANOTHER study has come out documenting what most conservatives
>> consider to be blindingly obvious: the leftward tilt of the American
>> professoriate. The latest report, by political scientist Stanley Rothman
>> of Smith College, communications professor S. Robert Lichter of George
>> Mason University, and Canadian polling expert Neil Nevitte, published in
>> the online journal Forum, paints a stark picture of a politically skewed
>> academy. Nearly three quarters of the professors in a 1999 survey of
>> college faculty identified themselves as left/liberal, only 15 percent
>> as right/conservative; 50 percent were Democrats and 11 percent Republicans.
>>
>> A typical reaction to such studies from the left has been to shoot the
>> messenger without denying the basic facts of the message. Thus, on his
>> website, Michael Bérubé, a professor of literature and cultural studies
>> at Penn State who has often locked horns with conservative critics of
>> the academy, challenges the study's sample size and points out that it
>> was financed by a conservative foundation. Then he cites a 2001 survey
>> by the UCLA Higher Education Research Institute which yielded fairly
>> similar results: 5.3 percent of faculty members were classified as ''far
>> left," 42.3 percent as ''liberal," 34.3 percent as ''middle of the
>> road," 17.7 percent as ''conservative," and 0.3 percent as ''far right."
>> ''Yep," concedes Bérubé, ''we're a pretty liberal bunch."
>
> Ward Churchill is not a liberal; he hates liberals. He is a
> Republican, although he doesn;t too much care for them either.
\
So basically he's a crank.
In essence he loathes himself, frauds generally do, and he loathes society.
Losers ALWAYS do.
nuff said.
|
